2025 · Regular session · House bill
HB4063
HB4063 creates a filing, notice and release process for a “unilateral memorandum of contract”: a document signed only by someone who is not the property owner, claiming a purchase contract, purchase option, first-refusal/first-of…
Official caption: Relating to the filing and release of record of a unilateral memorandum of contract concerning residential property.
Official report lists House author(s): Ordaz, Hayes. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.
Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.
Bill highlights
Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.
- HB4063 creates a filing, notice and release process for a “unilateral memorandum of contract”: a document signed only by someone who is not the property owner, claiming a purchase contract, purchase option, first-refusal/first-offer right or right to match an offer.
- A person recording such a memorandum must give the county clerk a mailing address and a certificate of mailing.
- An owner who receives that notice or otherwise learns of the recorded memorandum may record a release affidavit stating the relevant facts and a mailing certificate.
- The filer can record a contradicting affidavit no later than the 45th day after the owner's mailing certificate was recorded, asserting that the owner's affidavit/certificate is untrue or another reason the memorandum remains valid notice.
- For a memorandum recorded on or after September 1, 2025 that fails the filer's notice/recording requirements, a separate provision removes its notice and inquiry effects, protects purchasers and lenders for value even if they knew of the memorandum, allows transfer free of the asserted interests, and limits the stated enforcement remedy to money damages.
What does it do?
HB4063 creates a filing, notice and release process for a “unilateral memorandum of contract”: a document signed only by someone who is not the property owner, claiming a purchase contract, purchase option, first-refusal/first-offer right or right to match an offer. It applies to single-family homes, duplexes, triplexes, quadruplexes and individually owned condominium units. Deeds and first-refusal rights granted in a condominium declaration are excluded. Signed June 20, 2025, the law took effect September 1, 2025. Final law · History
A person recording such a memorandum must give the county clerk a mailing address and a certificate of mailing. No later than the filing date, the person must send the memorandum and a notice letter by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, to the property address and the owner’s mailing addresses identified in the memorandum, property records or appraisal-district records. The act supplies a sworn certificate form requiring a copy of the letter and proof of mailing. Section 12.020(b), (h)
An owner who receives that notice or otherwise learns of the recorded memorandum may record a release affidavit stating the relevant facts and a mailing certificate. The owner must send the filed affidavit and notice letter by the specified registered/certified-mail method to the memorandum filer’s supplied address and the other referenced persons, excluding the owner. The act includes sworn forms; this is not permission to erase a disputed contract simply by making an unsupported statement. Section 12.020(c)–(d), (i)–(j)
The filer can record a contradicting affidavit no later than the 45th day after the owner’s mailing certificate was recorded, asserting that the owner’s affidavit/certificate is untrue or another reason the memorandum remains valid notice. Without that response, a qualifying good-faith purchaser, mortgage lender, successor or assignee may conclusively rely on the owner’s affidavit on and after the 45th day. Subject to these conditions, the memorandum no longer binds the protected purchaser/lender or clouds the transfer, and the claimant’s remedy to enforce the asserted rights is money damages. A timely contradicting affidavit prevents the stated release effect as to a purchaser or mortgagee acquiring from the owner. The law does not declare every underlying contract void. Section 12.020(e)–(g)
For a memorandum recorded on or after September 1, 2025 that fails the filer’s notice/recording requirements, a separate provision removes its notice and inquiry effects, protects purchasers and lenders for value even if they knew of the memorandum, allows transfer free of the asserted interests, and limits the stated enforcement remedy to money damages. That provision has its own filing-date limitation; it should not be described as automatically invalidating every older filing. Section 12.020(k)
What changed along the way?
The House committee substitute broadened the introduced definition to expressly cover purchase contracts and rights to match offers, not just options and first-refusal/first-offer rights, and made corresponding changes throughout the release provisions and forms. It also let owners use the process when they otherwise have notice, rather than only after receiving the statutory letter. Those changes survived unchanged in the House-passed, Senate committee and final texts. They were committee-substitute changes, not floor amendments: the official amendment index lists none. Introduced · House substitute · Version index · Amendment index
For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.
Official bill versions
Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.
Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?
Owners, buyers and mortgage lenders may benefit from a defined way to resolve the effect of one-sided recorded notices on a sale or loan. Contract claimants gain a notice-and-response route but risk losing rights against purchasers/lenders or being limited to damages if the statutory conditions apply. Both sides can incur recording, mailing, documentation and legal costs; a contradicting affidavit can leave a dispute unresolved.
The latest fiscal note anticipated no significant state or local-government fiscal impact and assumed state costs could be absorbed with existing resources. It did not estimate private title-dispute costs or guarantee that the new process avoids litigation. May 18 fiscal note
Review boundary: This describes the new statutory process, not a determination of a particular contract’s validity, a title opinion or instructions that substitute for the statutory sworn forms. The precise recorded dates, required notices and any contradicting affidavit matter.
Official sources
- Bill history and latest recorded action
- Bill versions, analyses and fiscal notes
- Action history and votes
- Amendment index
Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.