2025 Texas sessionsRegular and both called sessions have ended. This index covers House and Senate bills, not resolutions. Statuses come from official reports.

← Back to bills and search results

2025 · Regular session · House bill

HB4070

HB4070 requires patient examinations, diagnostic review, a prescription and counseling before covered orthodontic devices are sold or related design/manufacturing services are provided to Texas patients.

Read bill highlights ↓

Official caption: Relating to the sale, design, and manufacture of orthodontic devices.

Became law without signatureSource-checked explanation published

Official report lists House author(s): Johnson, Ashby, Darby, Harless, Villalobos. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.

Report an error ↗

Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.

Bill highlights

Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.

Read the full explanation ↓

What does it do?

HB4070 requires patient examinations, diagnostic review, a prescription and counseling before covered orthodontic devices are sold or related design/manufacturing services are provided to Texas patients. The covered devices are individually manufactured FDA class II or III devices used to move teeth or jaws or correct their alignment. Retainers used to keep teeth in a fixed position are excluded. The bill became law without the governor’s signature June 20, 2025, and applies to sales and services on or after September 1, 2025; earlier transactions remain under prior law. Final act · History

Before the sale or service, the patient must receive an in-person examination inside the mouth and of the head and neck; a dentist’s review of recent, appropriate diagnostic imaging; and review of medical and dental histories. Imaging must be sufficient to detect conditions that make treatment unsafe, including untreated decay, gum disease, tooth-root problems, implants or other fixed appliances, and cracked teeth or roots. The act permits several appropriate imaging methods; it does not require every listed scan for every patient or specify a universal number of months for “recent.” Section 431.024(c)

The prescription must come from the dentist who examined the patient and reviewed the imaging, or the treating/monitoring dentist who received a referral or obtained and retained clearance from that examining dentist. A prescribing dentist must explain treatment options and risks, and the patient must sign a written acknowledgment kept in the patient’s file. A seller or design/manufacturing service provider must be a Texas-licensed dentist who provided the required services or receive written/electronic confirmation from such a dentist. The law does not prohibit all remote follow-up care; it requires these prerequisites. Section 431.024(b)–(d)

Sellers and service providers must keep documents received under the prerequisite provisions for at least seven years after the sale or service. Dentists cannot condition the examination or imaging review on agreement to use a particular device type. The examining dentist must provide collected exam/imaging records to a requesting dentist when disclosure is authorized, under the existing dental-record rules. Those rules generally require disclosure within a reasonable time, no later than 30 days or a court-ordered date, while retaining confidentiality, the specified harm-based refusal process, redaction and reasonable-fee provisions. Section 431.024(e)–(g) · Occupations Code 258.109

What changed along the way?

The introduced, House committee, House-passed, Senate committee and enrolled versions contain the same substantive requirements. Both committees reported without amendments, and the official amendment index lists none. The safeguards and retainer exclusion were in the original proposal and survived; they were not later floor-amendment additions. Introduced text · Version index · Amendment index

For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.

Official bill versions

Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.

Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?

Patients may benefit from screening for conditions that make tooth movement unsafe, documented counseling and access to records for another dentist. Patients may also face additional visits, imaging or professional fees. Dentists, device sellers and related service providers must arrange the checks and keep records. The act does not set prices, require insurance coverage or guarantee a clinical result.

The latest fiscal note anticipated no significant state or local-government fiscal impact and assumed state costs could be absorbed with existing resources. It did not quantify patient prices or private compliance costs. May 23 fiscal note

Review boundary: This explains the statutory prerequisites, not individual treatment advice or an FDA classification decision for a particular product. Class II/III are federal regulatory categories; the bill also requires the device to meet its individualized orthodontic-use definition. Federal class definitions · 21 CFR 860.3

Official sources

Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.