2025 · Regular session · House bill
HB42
HB42 raises annual Higher Education Fund allocations from $393.75 million to $590.625 million—a 50% increase—and redistributes that money among eligible institutions.
Official caption: Relating to the amount and allocation of the annual constitutional appropriation to certain agencies and institutions of higher education and to the permissible uses of that money.
Official report lists House author(s): Wilson, Shaheen, Tinderholt, Howard, VanDeaver. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.
Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.
Bill highlights
Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.
- HB42 raises annual Higher Education Fund allocations from $393.75 million to $590.625 million—a 50% increase—and redistributes that money among eligible institutions.
- The 31 listed allocations add up to $590,625,001—one dollar more than the stated annual total.
- This is capital funding, not a general tuition subsidy or unrestricted operating grant.
- The revised formula considers space shortages, building condition and institutional complexity, with a separate Texas State Technical College allocation.
- The law also specifies shared allocations for Texas Tech's health sciences center and its Abilene and Dallas branches, and for the Texas Woman's University System.
What does it do?
HB42 raises annual Higher Education Fund allocations from $393.75 million to $590.625 million—a 50% increase—and redistributes that money among eligible institutions. The new amounts begin with fiscal 2026, which started September 1, 2025. The governor signed the law June 20; it took effect September 1, 2025. The required two-thirds legislative approval for the increase was achieved. Final law; official history.
The 31 listed allocations add up to $590,625,001—one dollar more than the stated annual total. The figures here follow the enacted text without silently changing that discrepancy.
This is capital funding, not a general tuition subsidy or unrestricted operating grant. The constitutional purposes include land, construction, major repairs, capital equipment and library materials. Facilities used only for student housing, intercollegiate athletics or auxiliary enterprises are excluded. HB42 also expressly lets participating boards use allocations to pay principal and interest on Chapter 55 bonds whose proceeds were spent for the eligible constitutional purposes. Constitution, Article VII, Section 17(a), (f); final law, Section 1.
The revised formula considers space shortages, building condition and institutional complexity, with a separate Texas State Technical College allocation. Examples of annual amounts are:
- Texas Tech University: $82,671,774; University of Houston: $70,708,909; Texas State University: $57,704,160.
- University of North Texas and its Frisco branch: $65,142,741, divided by the system’s regents.
- New separate lines for Sam Houston State University’s College of Osteopathic Medicine: $7,555,972, and the University of Houston College of Medicine: $5,746,678.
- Texas State Technical College: $12,993,750, with an updated county-based list of campuses, excluding extension centers and programs.
The law also specifies shared allocations for Texas Tech’s health sciences center and its Abilene and Dallas branches, and for the Texas Woman’s University System. Victoria’s $6,030,405 follows the university into the Texas A&M system: the related transfer law, SB2361, was signed May 27, 2025 and provides for that September transfer. SB2361 expressly preserves HB42’s allocation amounts if both become law. Repealing an obsolete exclusion concerning UT–Pan American and UT–Brownsville does not add a new allocation to either institution. HB42 allocation table and Sections 4–6; SB2361, Sections 23–24; SB2361 history.
What changed along the way?
The filed bill proposed $590.625 million annually. The House committee substitute increased that to $787.5 million. Wilson’s adopted House floor amendment replaced the bill with a version setting $892,851,716 and revising institutional allocations and branch-campus language. Those larger House amounts did not become law. Filed text; House substitute; amendment index; Wilson amendment; House-passed text.
The adopted Senate substitute restored the $590.625 million total, rewrote the allocation table and updated the technical-college campus list. It removed the earlier versions’ conditional plan to drop TSTC from this funding formula in fiscal 2027 if voters approved a separate capital-funding amendment. The final HB42 retains TSTC’s allocation; separate constitutional or budget measures should not be confused with that discarded provision. The House accepted the Senate changes; there was no conference report. Senate substitute; adopted Senate amendment packet, pages 16–22.
For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.
Official bill versions
Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.
Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?
Eligible institutions and their students could benefit from better-equipped or repaired facilities and greater capacity to service qualifying capital debt. The law sets allocations; it does not establish that any specific project will be completed or tuition reduced. Institutions receive different changes because the money is redistributed rather than simply raising every old allocation by 50%.
The final fiscal note estimates an additional $196.875 million in state general revenue each year, or $393.75 million over fiscal 2026–27, with no anticipated local-government fiscal impact. It describes HB42 as the legal basis for funding rather than a standalone appropriation. The separately enacted state budget lists $590.625 million for the Higher Education Fund in each of those two years. The budget’s separate conditional TSTC top-up is not an automatic extra $52 million granted by HB42. State taxpayers bear the higher expenditure, leaving those resources unavailable for other priorities. Final fiscal note; SB1, printed III-76 and IX-124 / PDF pages 326 and 1018; governor’s budget veto proclamation.
Official sources
- Bill history and latest recorded action
- Bill versions, analyses and fiscal notes
- Action history and votes
- Amendment index
Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.