← Back to bills and search results
2025 · Regular session · House bill
HB4215
HB4215, effective September 1, 2025, extends Texas's transportation-network regulatory framework to qualifying delivery-network companies.
Official caption: Relating to the regulation of delivery network companies; requiring an occupational permit; authorizing a fee.
Official report lists House author(s): Hunter. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.
Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.
Bill highlights
Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.
- HB4215, effective September 1, 2025, extends Texas's transportation-network regulatory framework to qualifying delivery-network companies.
- Companies must obtain and maintain a Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation permit and pay an annual fee set by rule to cover administration.
- The law gives the state exclusive regulatory authority over the covered companies, logged-in delivery people and delivery vehicles, including permits, rates and operational requirements, rather than allowing separate local industry rules.
- Before authorizing a delivery person, a company must confirm the person is at least 18, check the required identification, conduct the specified local/state/national criminal screening and check the national sex-offender website.
- Companies must adopt a policy prohibiting any amount of intoxication while logged in, post the policy and complaint route on their website or app, and retain relevant complaint records for at least two years.
- Under the new Texas provision, a delivery person qualifies as an independent contractor if the company does not prescribe working hours or delivery territory, restrict use of competing delivery networks, or restrict another occupation or business, and both sides agree in writing to independent-contractor status.
What does it do?
HB4215, effective September 1, 2025, extends Texas’s transportation-network regulatory framework to qualifying delivery-network companies. These are businesses using a digital network to arrange food, beverage or consumer-goods deliveries from restaurants or retailers. A business that only delivers products it produces or stores on its own premises is excluded from that definition. Covered delivery can include attempted deliveries, selecting or collecting items and incidental tasks.
Companies must obtain and maintain a Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation permit and pay an annual fee set by rule to cover administration. The department may not charge a separate fee for each delivery person or vehicle. It may suspend or revoke a company’s permit for violating the chapter.
The law gives the state exclusive regulatory authority over the covered companies, logged-in delivery people and delivery vehicles, including permits, rates and operational requirements, rather than allowing separate local industry rules. It also says they are not common, contract or motor carriers under this provision. This does not exempt anyone from ordinary traffic laws; the underlying Chapter 2402 retains traffic-law enforcement provisions.
Before authorizing a delivery person, a company must confirm the person is at least 18, check the required identification, conduct the specified local/state/national criminal screening and check the national sex-offender website. Intended motor-vehicle delivery also requires a valid Texas or other-state driver’s license and driving-record review. The law bars access for listed convictions within seven years, sex-offender registration, and specified motor-vehicle convictions within the applicable three-year record period. That driving-record threshold includes more than four moving violations, not four. Companies must restrict access on a law-enforcement request or court order.
Companies must adopt a policy prohibiting any amount of intoxication while logged in, post the policy and complaint route on their website or app, and retain relevant complaint records for at least two years. They must also adopt and communicate a nondiscrimination policy covering location or destination, race, color, national origin, religion, sex, disability and age. The statute defines sex here as the physical condition of being male or female. Delivery people must comply, and companies cannot add a delivery charge because a customer has a physical disability.
Under the new Texas provision, a delivery person qualifies as an independent contractor if the company does not prescribe working hours or delivery territory, restrict use of competing delivery networks, or restrict another occupation or business, and both sides agree in writing to independent-contractor status. The label alone does not meet those conditions.
Companies must keep records showing compliance for two years. The bill extends existing public-agency confidentiality and security rules to company information, protects a company against specified misuse of required delivery-person information while a public entity holds it, and limits disclosures of customers’ identifying information to consent, legal obligations or the specified service-terms purposes. Customer names may be shared with delivery people to identify or communicate with the customer. Voluntary municipal data-sharing agreements are permitted; public disclosure rules and court-order/subpoena exceptions still matter.
What changed along the way?
The introduced bill was broader in some respects. The House substitute added the own-products/premises exclusion, clarified delivery scope, allowed non-driving delivery people to use government-issued photo identification, and removed the proposed platform check of vehicle-registration and financial-responsibility proof. It changed the moving-violation cutoff from more than three to more than four, replaced an annual criminal-check requirement with a preauthorization check, and added access restriction on law-enforcement request or court order.
The substitute also allowed the intoxication notice in the app, clarified the independent-contractor and customer-name provisions, and replaced proposed five-year delivery/worker-record requirements with two-year compliance records for delivery companies. The five-year ride/driver rules for passenger transportation companies were not simply erased. Removing a proposed platform proof check does not repeal drivers’ general vehicle or insurance obligations.
The engrossed, Senate committee and enrolled texts retained the substitute’s operative provisions. The amendment index lists no floor amendments. The history records the governor’s May 28 signature.
For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.
Official bill versions
Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.
Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?
Customers gain screening, complaint and nondiscrimination requirements. Companies gain a single state framework but face permit fees and compliance costs. Delivery people may be excluded by screening rules, and qualifying independent-contractor treatment can affect access to protections associated with employee status. Local governments lose authority to impose the covered industry-specific requirements. Privacy safeguards protect company and worker information but reduce public access to records provided to government.
The latest fiscal note estimated a $820,000 net gain to state general-revenue-related funds for fiscal years 2026–2027: $900,000 in permit revenue minus $80,000 for licensing-system changes. It assumed about 50 companies, $10,500 initial permits and $7,500 renewals under the fee schedule used for its estimate, and existing staff capacity. Those are fiscal assumptions, not dollar fees written into HB4215 or a current fee quote. More regulated companies could require additional resources. No significant local fiscal impact was anticipated, and the bill itself appropriated no money.
Review boundary: This explains the enacted Texas framework, not current permit status, current agency fee rules or an individual worker’s classification under every federal law. It does not promise that a background check prevents every incident.
Official sources
- Bill history and latest recorded action
- Bill versions, analyses and fiscal notes
- Action history and votes
- Amendment index
Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.