2025 · Regular session · House bill
HB426
HB426 requires Medicaid to cover the full cost of a qualifying cranial-remolding orthosis for a child enrolled in the program, with CHIP providing coverage in the same manner.
Official caption: Relating to Medicaid and child health plan program coverage and reimbursement for childhood cranial remolding orthosis.
Official report lists House author(s): Bernal, Dorazio, Swanson, Bonnen, Gervin-Hawkins. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.
Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.
Bill highlights
Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.
- HB426 requires Medicaid to cover the full cost of a qualifying cranial-remolding orthosis for a child enrolled in the program, with CHIP providing coverage in the same manner.
- The law identifies two diagnostic routes.
- The governor signed HB426 June 20, 2025, and it took effect September 1, 2025.
What does it do?
HB426 requires Medicaid to cover the full cost of a qualifying cranial-remolding orthosis for a child enrolled in the program, with CHIP providing coverage in the same manner. The device is a custom-fitted or custom-made medical device worn on the head to correct a deformity, improve function or relieve symptoms of structural cranial disease—often described as a remolding helmet. Coverage cannot be less favorable than Medicaid coverage for other orthotics. This is a Medicaid and CHIP requirement, not a mandate on every private insurance plan. Final law
The law identifies two diagnostic routes. A child may qualify with craniosynostosis. For plagiocephaly or brachycephaly, the child must be 3–18 months old, have documented failure to respond to conservative therapy for at least two months, and meet a specified measurement test: either an asymmetry with a right/left craniofacial measurement difference greater than six millimeters, or the specified head-length/head-width disproportion with a cephalic index two standard deviations above or below the mean. The age, therapy and measurement conditions are attached to the second route, not stated as conditions on the separate craniosynostosis route. A diagnosis and clinical assessment matter; this is not coverage for every helmet or head-shape concern. Clinical eligibility in section 32.03126
The governor signed HB426 June 20, 2025, and it took effect September 1, 2025. If a state agency determines that federal approval or a waiver is needed for a provision, it must request that approval and may delay implementing the provision until approval is granted. The effective date alone therefore does not prove that a particular claim was payable that day. Federal-approval condition and timing · Official history
What changed along the way?
Although the House reported a committee substitute, the official comparison says its only difference from the introduced bill was a Legislative Council draft number in the footer. Full text comparisons confirm no substantive change through the House-passed, Senate committee and enrolled versions. The floor-amendment index lists none. The final votes were 108–40 in the House, with one present but not voting, and 27–4 in the Senate. House analysis and substitute comparison · All versions · Amendment index · Final certifications
For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.
Official bill versions
Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.
Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?
Children who meet the specified Medicaid or CHIP criteria could obtain treatment with less out-of-pocket burden on their families. Providers gain a statutory reimbursement requirement, while state and federal public funds bear projected program costs. The committee analysis presents improved access as the purpose; it does not prove a particular child’s medical outcome or that every family qualifies. Committee explanation
The latest fiscal note estimated a $2,265,870 net cost to General Revenue-related funds for fiscal years 2026–2027. It assumed services would start September 1, 2026 after policy and rate work, producing no cost in fiscal 2026 and about $5.81 million in total state-and-federal client-service costs in fiscal 2027. The net state figure reflects assumed premium-tax offsets; it is not the entire program cost. The estimate assumed 3,114 additional Medicaid users and three CHIP users in fiscal 2027, and no significant local-government or technology cost. These are planning assumptions, not verified implementation dates, actual patient counts or an appropriation made by HB426. Latest fiscal note and methodology
Official sources
- Bill history and latest recorded action
- Bill versions, analyses and fiscal notes
- Action history and votes
- Amendment index
Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.