← Back to bills and search results
2025 · Regular session · House bill
HB4361
HB4361 directs the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board to adopt rules establishing standardized procedures for timely emergency notifications at public institutions of higher education.
Official caption: Relating to establishing policies regarding the timely issuance of emergency notifications at public institutions of higher education.
Official report lists House author(s): Ward Johnson, Howard, Garcia Hernandez, Cassandra, Walle, Simmons. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.
Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.
Bill highlights
Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.
- HB4361 directs the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board to adopt rules establishing standardized procedures for timely emergency notifications at public institutions of higher education.
- The procedures must comply with the federal Jeanne Clery Campus Safety Act and include alerts through the system already required by Education Code Section 51.218.
- The incorporated federal statute, 20 U.S.C.
- The act took effect June 20, 2025, immediately upon the governor's signature after the required votes.
What does it do?
HB4361 directs the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board to adopt rules establishing standardized procedures for timely emergency notifications at public institutions of higher education. The board must consult campus administrators, faculty, staff and students.
The procedures must comply with the federal Jeanne Clery Campus Safety Act and include alerts through the system already required by Education Code Section 51.218. That existing system uses email or telephone notifications in addition to other appropriate methods, enrolls students and staff when they begin, permits an annually renewed opt-out, and protects the collected personal contact information. HB4361 does not create those existing requirements anew or remove the opt-out.
The incorporated federal statute, 20 U.S.C. Section 1092(f), distinguishes immediate emergency notification from timely reporting of threatening crimes. Its emergency provision addresses confirmation of a significant emergency or dangerous situation presenting an immediate campus health or safety threat, with an exception when notification would compromise efforts to contain the emergency. HB4361 calls for standardized procedures consistent with that framework; it does not itself specify a universal number of minutes for every alert.
The act took effect June 20, 2025, immediately upon the governor’s signature after the required votes. Rules must be adopted as soon as practicable, not by a fixed date stated in this bill. The new Chapter 61 provision uses the statutory public-institution category. The fact that the older Section 51.218 also covers private institutions does not make HB4361 a newly imposed private-college alert-system mandate.
What changed along the way?
The introduced, House committee, engrossed, Senate committee and enrolled operative texts are identical. The amendment index lists no amendments, and the history shows passage without a substantive change. The September 1 fallback clause did not control because the bill qualified for immediate effect.
For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.
Official bill versions
Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.
Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?
Students, faculty and staff could benefit from more consistent decisions about when and how campuses send emergency notices. Institutions and the coordinating board must contribute to rulemaking and implement the resulting procedures. The law does not guarantee that every incident will produce an alert or that an alert can prevent every injury.
The latest listed fiscal note, on the engrossed bill, anticipated no significant state fiscal impact, assumed costs could be absorbed with existing resources, and anticipated no local-government fiscal implication. It did not quantify improved response times or avoided harm.
Review boundary: This explains the enacted rulemaking direction and incorporated statutory framework, not whether final coordinating-board rules have since been adopted or whether a particular campus complied during an incident.
Official sources
- Bill history and latest recorded action
- Bill versions, analyses and fiscal notes
- Action history and votes
- Amendment index
Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.