← Back to bills and search results
2025 · Regular session · House bill
HB4466
HB4466 requires the state registrar, a local registrar or a county clerk to provide a certified birth-record copy without a fee when a qualifying county or child welfare board requests it for a specified government-filed case aff…
Official caption: Relating to restrictions on the fee assessed for issuance of certain birth records.
Official report lists House author(s): Hickland. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.
Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.
Bill highlights
Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.
- HB4466 requires the state registrar, a local registrar or a county clerk to provide a certified birth-record copy without a fee when a qualifying county or child welfare board requests it for a specified government-filed case affecting the parent-child relationship.
- The requester must be a county or a child welfare board appointed by a county commissioners court.
- The act adds this exemption to the existing birth-record fee exemptions.
What does it do?
HB4466 requires the state registrar, a local registrar or a county clerk to provide a certified birth-record copy without a fee when a qualifying county or child welfare board requests it for a specified government-filed case affecting the parent-child relationship. The governor signed it June 20, 2025, and it took effect September 1, 2025.
The requester must be a county or a child welfare board appointed by a county commissioners court. The request must relate to a suit filed by a governmental entity under Subtitle E, Title 5 of the Family Code, which concerns protecting children. The certified copy goes to the county or board. This is not a general waiver for every parent, every birth-certificate request or every private custody or divorce case.
The act adds this exemption to the existing birth-record fee exemptions. It changes the charge for the covered record; it does not change who wins custody or the legal standard for removing a child.
What changed along the way?
The introduced bill covered only a county requesting a copy from the state registrar. The House committee substitute added qualifying child welfare boards as requesters and local registrars and county clerks as issuers. Those additions remained in the final law.
The House substitute, engrossed, Senate committee and enrolled operative texts match. The history and text index document the progression; the amendment index lists no amendments.
For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.
Official bill versions
Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.
Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?
Counties and child welfare boards avoid paying for certified records needed in the covered cases. Children and families may benefit indirectly when caseworkers can obtain documentation without that expense. Issuing offices lose the associated fee revenue and still have to process requests.
The latest listed fiscal note cited a $22 certified-birth-record fee. It anticipated no significant state fiscal implication and assumed the Department of State Health Services could absorb costs, but said the revenue effect and local-government fiscal implications could not be determined because the number of qualifying requests was unknown. That is not a finding of zero revenue loss. The earlier introduced-version note discussed staffing needs if orders increased; it did not establish that the final law funded additional positions.
Official sources
- Bill history and latest recorded action
- Bill versions, analyses and fiscal notes
- Action history and votes
- Amendment index
Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.