2025 Texas sessionsRegular and both called sessions have ended. This index covers House and Senate bills, not resolutions. Statuses come from official reports.

← Back to bills

2025 · Regular session · House bill

HB4506

HB4506 lets Texas municipalities deliver certain zoning-hearing notices by email or text message, but only to recipients who choose electronic delivery.

Read bill highlights ↓

Official caption: Relating to electronic delivery of notice for certain municipal zoning changes.

Signed by governorSource-checked explanation published

Official report lists House author(s): Bonnen. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.

Report an error ↗

Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.

Bill highlights

Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.

Read the full explanation ↓

What does it do?

HB4506 lets Texas municipalities deliver certain zoning-hearing notices by email or text message, but only to recipients who choose electronic delivery. It was signed and took effect June 20, 2025. Cities are not required to replace mailed notices.

A city using electronic delivery must provide an online portal on its website where recipients can opt in and manage their notice preferences. It must ask each electronic-notice recipient to acknowledge receipt. If the recipient does not acknowledge receipt, the city must deliver the notice by the method otherwise required by the zoning law. Sending an unacknowledged email is not enough under this provision. The act does not create a new grace period that overrides existing hearing-notice deadlines.

The express changes cover:

  • Notices to owners and occupants when a proposed zoning change would make a property’s currently permitted use nonconforming. Those notices still must be mailed or delivered electronically no later than the tenth day before the hearing and include the required bold warning about potentially losing the right to continue the current use.
  • Zoning-commission notices to owners of real property within 200 feet of a proposed zoning-classification change. Those notices remain due before the tenth day before the hearing.
  • Zoning-commission notices to affected school districts for residential or multifamily zoning changes, with the same before-the-tenth-day deadline. Existing small-county exceptions and a district’s ability to request notices remain in Section 211.007(c-2).

The bill changes delivery options, not the underlying decision about whether rezoning should be approved. It does not eliminate public hearings or independently replace other required public notices. The opt-in, portal and acknowledgment rules are in new Section 211.020.

What changed along the way?

The introduced and House committee versions had the same operative text: electronic-delivery options, a website portal and recipient consent. The sole indexed floor amendment, by Romero, added the acknowledgment request and fallback-delivery requirement. The House adopted it May 10, 2025. That safeguard remained unchanged in the House-passed, Senate committee and enrolled versions.

The Senate passed the bill without further amendment; there was no conference rewrite. The history, version index and amendment index document the path. Passage was 139–0 in the House, with one present but not voting, and 31–0 in the Senate, meeting the immediate-effect threshold.

For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.

Official bill versions

Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.

Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?

Recipients who prefer digital communication gain another way to receive notices. Cities may reduce some mailing work, but must operate the portal, track acknowledgments and use fallback delivery when needed. Opt-in and fallback rules help protect people who do not use electronic notices or do not confirm receipt. These are practical tradeoffs, not measured savings.

The latest fiscal note anticipated no state fiscal implication and no significant local-government fiscal implication. It did not quantify portal costs or postal savings. The act provides no new appropriation.

Official sources

Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.