2025 · Regular session · House bill
HB4520
HB4520 reduces the minimum non-state contribution for certain Texas Transportation Commission airport loans and grants when the airport is in an economically disadvantaged county.
Official caption: Relating to requirements for certain funding of aviation facilities and projects.
Official report lists House author(s): Martinez. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.
Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.
Bill highlights
Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.
- HB4520 reduces the minimum non-state contribution for certain Texas Transportation Commission airport loans and grants when the airport is in an economically disadvantaged county.
- The usual requirement remains at least 10% of total project cost from sources other than the state.
- The incorporated Section 222.053 definition uses below-average taxable property value per person, below-average income per person and above-average unemployment, compared with other Texas counties.
- Other Section 21.105 safeguards remain: local-government control of the airport or facility for at least 20 years, disclosure of funding sources and financial ability to operate the project, and adequate planning.
- Separately, the act repeals Section 21.114(b), which excluded reliever airports from the provision making TxDOT the state and local governments' agent for applying for, receiving and disbursing federal general-aviation airport funds.
What does it do?
HB4520 reduces the minimum non-state contribution for certain Texas Transportation Commission airport loans and grants when the airport is in an economically disadvantaged county. It was signed June 20, 2025, and took effect September 1, 2025.
The usual requirement remains at least 10% of total project cost from sources other than the state. For an airport in a qualifying county, that minimum becomes 5%. On a hypothetical $1 million project, the statutory minimum would drop from $100,000 to $50,000. That is an illustration—not an award, a guarantee that the state pays the remainder or an exemption from other applicable funding conditions.
The incorporated Section 222.053 definition uses below-average taxable property value per person, below-average income per person and above-average unemployment, compared with other Texas counties. It also contains a qualifying route for counties that met the economic criteria within the past six years and were included in at least five federally declared disasters in that period. A county does not qualify simply because a project sponsor calls it disadvantaged.
Other Section 21.105 safeguards remain: local-government control of the airport or facility for at least 20 years, disclosure of funding sources and financial ability to operate the project, and adequate planning. Existing loan-interest and term limits are unchanged.
Separately, the act repeals Section 21.114(b), which excluded reliever airports from the provision making TxDOT the state and local governments’ agent for applying for, receiving and disbursing federal general-aviation airport funds. Removing that exclusion expands the reach of the agency provision; it does not itself award federal funds or waive federal requirements.
What changed along the way?
The introduced and House committee versions were identical and contained only the lower county-based funding minimum. Two House amendments by Martinez were adopted May 14:
- Amendment 1 proposed removing the non-state minimum for projects specifically funded by the legislature and administered by TxDOT on a pass-through basis. It also proposed repealing the reliever-airport exclusion.
- Amendment 2 also proposed that repeal. The House-passed text contained one repeal section, not two separate substantive changes.
The Senate substitute removed the pass-through funding exemption but kept the 5% option and reliever-airport repeal. Its operative text matches the enacted law. The adopted substitute is in the Senate amendments packet, and the history records House concurrence May 28. The broader House exemption must not be treated as enacted. The text index provides the comparison trail.
For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.
Official bill versions
Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.
Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?
Eligible airport sponsors may find it easier to assemble the non-state share of a project. The change can shift a greater potential share toward state funding, but actual awards still depend on available money and approval. Reliever-airport sponsors gain access to the federal-funds agency arrangement addressed by the repealed exclusion.
The final fiscal note anticipated no significant state or local fiscal implication, assuming state costs could be absorbed within existing resources. It did not estimate a statewide dollar amount of reduced matching contributions. HB4520 provides no new appropriation or entitlement to a particular grant.
Official sources
- Bill history and latest recorded action
- Bill versions, analyses and fiscal notes
- Action history and votes
- Amendment index
Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.