2025 · Regular session · House bill
HB4630
HB4630 narrows the reach of a Water Code subchapter governing artesian wells and removes several TCEQ-specific reporting provisions.
Official caption: Relating to the regulation of artesian water wells by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality.
Official report lists House author(s): Kitzman. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.
Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.
Bill highlights
Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.
- HB4630 narrows the reach of a Water Code subchapter governing artesian wells and removes several TCEQ-specific reporting provisions.
- Under new Section 11.2011, most of the artesian-well subchapter applies only outside a groundwater conservation district, subsidence district or other conservation and reclamation district authorized to regulate well drilling, spacing or production.
- The act repeals the requirements to send TCEQ a completed artesian-well drilling record by registered mail, submit a sworn new-well report within a year, and submit the specified annual non-domestic-use report.
- Other well records and protections still matter: For example, Occupations Code Section 1901.251 separately requires a driller's well log and delivery of copies.
- The bill removes the repealed drilling-record provision from Water Code Section 7.142's offense list and updates the numbering.
What does it do?
HB4630 narrows the reach of a Water Code subchapter governing artesian wells and removes several TCEQ-specific reporting provisions. It was signed and took effect June 20, 2025.
Under new Section 11.2011, most of the artesian-well subchapter applies only outside a groundwater conservation district, subsidence district or other conservation and reclamation district authorized to regulate well drilling, spacing or production. This is not a blanket exemption from local groundwater rules or all state well laws.
Two protections remain applicable regardless of that district boundary:
- Section 11.202(c): Water containing substances harmful to vegetation or agriculture must be controlled, the well capped, or the well properly plugged as specified, to prevent the described injury or escape of water.
- Section 11.206: An improperly cased or controlled artesian well that allows the specified surface flow or underground waste remains a public nuisance subject to abatement by TCEQ’s executive director.
The act repeals the requirements to send TCEQ a completed artesian-well drilling record by registered mail, submit a sworn new-well report within a year, and submit the specified annual non-domestic-use report. It also removes a restriction expressly limited to the September 1991–January 1994 period and its exemption procedure. Removing that expired provision is not a new general permission to drill high-flow wells.
Other well records and protections still matter. For example, Occupations Code Section 1901.251 separately requires a driller’s well log and delivery of copies. HB4630 does not repeal that law, and groundwater districts retain their separate statutory powers.
The bill removes the repealed drilling-record provision from Water Code Section 7.142’s offense list and updates the numbering. It retains the offense reference for unlawful waste under Section 11.205 where that provision applies. The associated Section 7.187 penalty remains a fine up to $1,000, confinement up to 90 days, or both; this bill does not increase that ceiling.
What changed along the way?
All five available versions—introduced, House committee, House-passed, Senate committee and enrolled—have identical operative language. No floor amendments are listed. The Senate history records a corrected committee report; the available Senate HTML and alternate official PDF carry the same operative provisions as the other versions.
The history, text index and amendment index document passage. House passage was 121–0, with two present but not voting; Senate passage was 31–0. The immediate-effect threshold was met.
For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.
Official bill versions
Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.
Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?
Well owners and operators lose several specific TCEQ reporting duties, potentially reducing overlapping paperwork. The geographic change leaves more of the relevant regulation to authorized districts, while retaining the two statewide protections identified above. Owners should not infer that all reporting, drilling or waste-prevention duties disappeared.
The latest fiscal note anticipated no significant state or local fiscal implication, with state costs absorbed in existing resources and no significant correctional or local enforcement effect. It did not quantify private paperwork savings or groundwater benefits. No appropriation is included.
Official sources
- Bill history and latest recorded action
- Bill versions, analyses and fiscal notes
- Action history and votes
- Amendment index
Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.