← Back to bills and search results
2025 · Regular session · House bill
HB49
HB49 expands protection against certain civil damage claims for people who produce, transport, treat or beneficially reuse fluid oil-and-gas waste, while preserving specified claims and protections for landowners.
Official caption: Relating to the treatment and beneficial use of fluid oil and gas waste and related material, including a limitation on liability for that treatment or use.
Official report lists House author(s): Darby, Morales, Eddie, Craddick, Dyson, Canales. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.
Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.
Bill highlights
Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.
- HB49 expands protection against certain civil damage claims for people who produce, transport, treat or beneficially reuse fluid oil-and-gas waste, while preserving specified claims and protections for landowners.
- The existing statutory definition of fluid oil-and-gas waste includes brine, hydraulic-fracturing fluid, flowback, produced water and other fluids arising from drilling or production.
- A separate provision protects people who produce the waste or supply or convey it to a treatment facility from specified claims involving subsequent treatment, later use, or exposure to waste components or treatment byproducts.
- Important exceptions remain: Subsection (b) preserves liability for exposure-related personal injury, death or property damage resulting from gross negligence or an intentional wrongful act or omission.
- Subsection (b-1) separately preserves a producer's or subsequent recipient's liability under common, statutory, regulatory or other law to surface owners and holders of interests in the surface estate where waste is produced, transported or treated.
- The Railroad Commission's rulemaking duty is extended to treated waste and treatment byproducts as well as fluid oil-and-gas waste.
What does it do?
HB49 expands protection against certain civil damage claims for people who produce, transport, treat or beneficially reuse fluid oil-and-gas waste, while preserving specified claims and protections for landowners. It changes who may be held financially responsible; it is not a blanket approval to discharge wastewater or a finding that a particular reuse is safe. Signed June 20, 2025, it took effect September 1, 2025 and applies only to legal claims that accrue on or after that date. Earlier claims remain governed by the former law. Final law; official history.
The existing statutory definition of fluid oil-and-gas waste includes brine, hydraulic-fracturing fluid, flowback, produced water and other fluids arising from drilling or production. Before HB49, the liability protection focused on treated products transferred for use in drilling or oil-and-gas production. The new language covers treated waste put to a beneficial use, either by the treating person or by someone receiving it under a contractual understanding that it will be beneficially used. It expressly includes surface-property owners who perform the covered activity. The law does not itself certify that a proposed use meets environmental requirements. Final law, Section 122.003(a); Natural Resources Code Chapter 122.
A separate provision protects people who produce the waste or supply or convey it to a treatment facility from specified claims involving subsequent treatment, later use, or exposure to waste components or treatment byproducts. Another provision protects surface-property owners from exposure-related injury, death or property-damage claims where the waste is produced, conveyed, transported or treated by others on or under their property. The law distinguishes ownership of the land from personally performing a covered operation. Final law, Section 122.003(a-1)–(a-2).
Important exceptions remain. Subsection (b) preserves liability for exposure-related personal injury, death or property damage resulting from gross negligence or an intentional wrongful act or omission. It also preserves claims involving negligence together with failure to conform to the listed Railroad Commission rules, state water-discharge permits or Railroad Commission hauling/handling permits. Ordinary negligence by itself is not the same as the negligence-plus-regulatory-noncompliance exception. Final law, Section 122.003(b).
Subsection (b-1) separately preserves a producer’s or subsequent recipient’s liability under common, statutory, regulatory or other law to surface owners and holders of interests in the surface estate where waste is produced, transported or treated. For claims based solely on negligence and regulatory noncompliance under subsection (b)(2), punitive damages—extra damages intended to punish—cannot be awarded. That provision does not say all compensatory damages are barred or that punitive damages can never be available on another legal basis. These protections and exceptions must be read together; the briefing does not promise how a court will resolve a particular dispute. Final law, Section 122.003(b-1)–(c).
The Railroad Commission’s rulemaking duty is extended to treated waste and treatment byproducts as well as fluid oil-and-gas waste. Existing permitting and other regulatory requirements are not replaced with a general exemption. HB49 does not amend the chapter’s ownership-transfer section. Final law, bill Section 2; Chapter 122.
What changed along the way?
The filed bill proposed a new “treated product” definition and changes to ownership-transfer language. The House committee substitute removed those proposals. It instead used “treated waste,” expressly covered surface owners and exposure to waste components, and added the separate protection for surface owners. The final law therefore should not be described as enacting the filed bill’s new ownership terms. Filed text; House substitute; version index.
The official index lists one floor amendment, Darby’s House amendment adopted May 9, 2025. It expressly included surface owners in the treatment provision, added the preservation of claims owed to surface owners and cross-referenced that protection, and added Railroad Commission hauling/handling permits to the regulatory-noncompliance exception. It also revised the separate surface-owner protection to cover waste treated “by others” and removed that subsection’s opening cross-reference to subsection (b). The final text still retains subsection (b)’s statement that “this section does not affect” the specified liability; the amendment is not a sound basis for promising unlimited immunity. Amendment text; amendment index; final law.
The Senate passed the House-engrossed policy without further substantive changes, and there was no conference compromise. The House’s final vote was 109–21 with two present but not voting; the Senate’s was 29–2. History; enrolled certifications.
For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.
Official bill versions
Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.
Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?
Waste producers, transporters and treatment businesses may face less exposure to certain lawsuits, which could encourage investment in reuse. Surface owners receive both a specific defense for others’ activities and preservation of claims against producers or subsequent recipients. Those protections do not guarantee a successful claim or defense in every case.
People alleging injury or property damage may face a narrower path to recovery, especially where a claim rests on ordinary negligence without the required regulatory noncompliance. The punitive-damages restriction further limits one category of recovery. Any resulting changes in insurance costs, reuse volumes, environmental harm or litigation outcomes are not quantified by the bill or established by this review.
The latest posted fiscal note anticipates no significant state or local fiscal impact and assumes agency costs can be absorbed with existing resources. That is a government-budget estimate, not a finding that the law has no economic effect on businesses, landowners or injured people. Latest fiscal note.
Official sources
- Bill history and latest recorded action
- Bill versions, analyses and fiscal notes
- Action history and votes
- Amendment index
Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.