2025 Texas sessionsRegular and both called sessions have ended. This index covers House and Senate bills, not resolutions. Statuses come from official reports.

← Back to bills and search results

2025 · Regular session · House bill

HB4945

HB4945 directs the Teacher Retirement System of Texas (TRS) to study alternative retirement benefits for Texas A&M Forest Service wildland firefighters and related employees.

Read bill highlights ↓

Official caption: Relating to a study by the Teacher Retirement System of Texas on the feasibility of offering alternative service retirement benefits to certain members of the retirement system engaged in wildland firefighting or employed in positions related to wildland firefighting.

Signed by governorSource-checked explanation published

Official report lists House author(s): Ashby, Bumgarner. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.

Report an error ↗

Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.

Bill highlights

Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.

Read the full explanation ↓

What does it do?

HB4945 directs the Teacher Retirement System of Texas (TRS) to study alternative retirement benefits for Texas A&M Forest Service wildland firefighters and related employees. It does not itself award higher pensions or allow earlier retirement. The required study examines whether those changes would be feasible and what they would cost.

The study must examine a proposed Hazardous Duty tier with three retirement routes: age 55 with at least 10 years of wildland-firefighter service credit; at least 25 years of that credit regardless of age; or at least 20 years, with the annuity reduced 5% for each year below the tier’s normal retirement age. A proposed Hazardous Duty–Administrative Support tier covers vested members who spent their entire Forest Service employment as wildland firefighters, and members with enough wildland-firefighter service to meet vesting requirements who work in a support position when they retire.

For the Hazardous Duty proposal and the first administrative-support category, the study considers a benefit based on the five highest-paid years, whether consecutive or not, using the ordinary retirement formula’s percentage factor plus 0.5 percentage point. For the second support category, it considers the proposed age/service rules without that added 0.5 percentage point. These are study scenarios, not an entitlement created by this law.

TRS must begin coordinating with the Forest Service by March 1, 2026, and report to the legislature by December 31, 2026. The work must identify eligible positions and salaries, assess service performed on or after September 1, 2009, estimate additional employer and employee contributions, and examine the effect of earlier retirement while protecting the pension system’s financial soundness. The Legislative Budget Board and Pension Review Board must assist as needed. The law took effect June 20, 2025; the study provision expires September 1, 2027. Enacted text · Official history.

What changed along the way?

The introduced bill already called for a study. The House committee substitute expressly included related employees, tied the service thresholds specifically to wildland-firefighter credit, clarified support-worker eligibility and the separate benefit calculations, and specified a report to the legislature. It also made the financial review and treatment of service since September 2009 more precise.

The House-engrossed, Senate committee and enrolled operative texts match that substitute. The amendment index lists no floor amendments. Removal from the local calendar did not kill the bill: both chambers later passed it and the governor signed it. The text-version index provides the successive texts.

For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.

Official bill versions

Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.

Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?

Firefighters and support employees could benefit from a clearer assessment of whether retirement rules fit hazardous work. Any actual benefit increase would require further action; this law promises a study, not a larger check. Employers, employees and the pension system could face additional contribution costs if future lawmakers adopt the options, which is why the study must quantify them.

The latest fiscal note expects no significant state fiscal impact from the study, assumes existing resources can absorb its cost, and anticipates no local-government fiscal impact. That is not a finding that implementing the proposed retirement benefits would be free.

Official sources

Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.