2025 · Regular session · House bill
HB4996
HB4996 raises the offense of refusing to release a fraudulent lien or claim from a Class A misdemeanor to a third-degree felony when the property owner is someone the offender knows is a public servant.
Official caption: Relating to increasing the criminal penalty for the offense of refusal to execute the release of a fraudulent lien or claim.
Official report lists House author(s): Dyson, Lujan. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.
Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.
Bill highlights
Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.
- HB4996 raises the offense of refusing to release a fraudulent lien or claim from a Class A misdemeanor to a third-degree felony when the property owner is someone the offender knows is a public servant.
- The existing offense still requires a fraudulent lien or claim, intent to defraud or harm, and refusal to execute a release within the statute's 21-day period after receiving the required notice requesting release.
- The standard punishment for a third-degree felony is two to ten years in prison, with an optional fine up to $10,000.
- The change took effect September 1, 2025, and applies only prospectively.
What does it do?
HB4996 raises the offense of refusing to release a fraudulent lien or claim from a Class A misdemeanor to a third-degree felony when the property owner is someone the offender knows is a public servant. It covers real or personal property. The ordinary offense remains a Class A misdemeanor when that additional condition is absent.
The existing offense still requires a fraudulent lien or claim, intent to defraud or harm, and refusal to execute a release within the statute’s 21-day period after receiving the required notice requesting release. The request must come from the debtor, obligor or someone with an ownership interest in the property. Existing law presumes intent to harm or defraud when the release is not executed within that period. HB4996 changes the penalty, not those elements; an ordinary good-faith dispute over a legitimate lien is not automatically this offense.
The standard punishment for a third-degree felony is two to ten years in prison, with an optional fine up to $10,000. A Class A misdemeanor ordinarily carries up to one year in jail, a fine up to $4,000, or both. These are statutory ranges, not a prediction of any individual’s sentence. “Public servant” is broader than elected officials: the Penal Code definition includes government employees and agents, jurors and certain other people performing governmental roles. Penalty provisions · Definitions.
The change took effect September 1, 2025, and applies only prospectively. If any element of the offense occurred before that date, former law governs. Enacted text · Existing offense with the new penalty.
What changed along the way?
The introduced bill already contained the public-servant penalty increase and September 1 effective date. Comparison of every indexed version found no operative changes through enrollment. Both committees reported the bill without amendments, and the amendment index lists no amendments.
The governor signed it June 20, 2025. This bill did not create a general new lien-removal process or change the penalty for all disputed liens. Official history · Text versions.
For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.
Official bill versions
Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.
Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?
Public servants targeted with fraudulent property claims may gain stronger deterrence and greater leverage for obtaining a release. Whether the higher penalty actually deters misconduct is an expected benefit, not a demonstrated result. People convicted under the enhanced offense face substantially greater punishment and the consequences of a felony conviction.
The latest fiscal note expects no significant state fiscal impact and assumes correctional demand will not change significantly. It likewise expects no significant local costs for enforcement, prosecution, supervision or confinement. That forecast does not mean prosecutions or incarceration cost nothing.
Official sources
- Bill history and latest recorded action
- Bill versions, analyses and fiscal notes
- Action history and votes
- Amendment index
Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.