2025 Texas sessionsRegular and both called sessions have ended. This index covers House and Senate bills, not resolutions. Statuses come from official reports.

← Back to bills

2025 · Regular session · House bill

HB500

HB500 adjusts Texas's budget with additional appropriations, permission to reuse earlier unspent money, transfers and spending reductions.

Read bill highlights ↓

Official caption: Relating to making supplemental appropriations and reductions in appropriations and giving direction and adjustment authority regarding appropriations.

Signed by governorSource-checked explanation published

Official report lists House author(s): Bonnen. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.

Report an error ↗

Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.

Bill highlights

Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.

Read the full explanation ↓

What does it do?

HB500 adjusts Texas’s budget with additional appropriations, permission to reuse earlier unspent money, transfers and spending reductions. It covers schools and health care, water and wildfire response, prisons, universities, state buildings and technology. Governor Abbott signed it June 22, 2025, with one line-item veto. The law took effect immediately; its special legislative-vote requirements for certain appropriations were met. Most spending windows run for two years from the law’s effective date, but some provisions specify a fiscal year or biennium instead. Final legislative text; history.

Read the veto with the bill. The governor struck the $50 million San Antonio sensitive compartmentalized information facility—secure space for classified work—in Section 1.14(a)(2). The separate $44 million Lubbock-area item remains, subject to federal sponsorship of facility clearance. The printed $94 million total in the enrolled document is not evidence that both projects survived. The governor said the San Antonio item duplicated other initiatives; that is his stated rationale, not a finding made by this briefing. Veto proclamation and marked provision.

Schools, colleges and emergency response

Article 3 provides about $1.150 billion for the Foundation School Program and sets its fiscal-2025 sum-certain appropriation at about $30.924 billion. It also provides $243 million to help districts and charter schools adopt and use open educational resource instructional materials, contingent on HB2 or similar school-finance legislation; HB2 became law. Other items include $369.225 million for TRS-ActiveCare, $35.3 million for the School for the Deaf’s utility-system construction, $1.394 million for special education, staffing and transportation at the School for the Blind and Visually Impaired, and $89.5 million for higher-than-projected community-college funding outcomes. These are funding provisions, not a promise of a specified payment to every student or teacher. Article 3; HB2 history.

The Forest Service receives about $124.754 million for natural-disaster response, $257 million to buy, maintain and operate firefighting aircraft, and $192.291 million to address the volunteer-fire-department assistance backlog. A separate $44 million transfer and appropriation supports the rural volunteer-fire-department program, with up to $1.54 million for administration. The transfer and subsequent appropriation describe the same $44 million, not $88 million. Emergency management receives $135 million for regional facilities, staging areas and response operations.

Higher-education projects include $59.8 million for the Bush Combat Development Center; $25 million for Easterwood Airport; $71 million for Texas Tech pulsed-power research facilities; $24.945 million for Texas State’s rapid-response law-enforcement training center; $65 million for the El Paso cancer-center partnership’s second phase; and $25 million for a rural cancer collaborative. Texas Tech also receives $120 million for an advanced reactor and Permian Basin desalination research. Further items support the Panhandle behavioral-health workforce ($4 million), UTMB’s aging-and-technology initiative ($5 million), and military-to-civilian technical-career training at Texas A&M–Central Texas ($2 million).

The law provides about $400.949 million to address qualifying unmatched research donations certified at the coordinating board’s January 2025 meeting, contingent on legislation repealing the Texas Research Incentive Program. SB2066 supplied that repeal. It separately authorizes $650 million for each newly qualifying Texas University Fund institution certified by the coordinating board, capped at $1.3 billion, with research-capacity use restrictions. That cap is conditional authority, not proof that $1.3 billion was actually deposited or spent. SB2066 final law; history.

Health and human services

Article 2 adds $750 million for Medicaid and permits specified transfers into Medicaid services, with reporting. It adds $82.568 million in general revenue and $14 million in federal funds for family/protective-services shortfalls, plus specified transfers from other existing appropriations. Other items include $100 million and authority for 144 additional full-time-equivalent positions at Dallas State Hospital; $98 million for deferred maintenance; $20 million for the Thriving Texas Families pregnancy-support program; about $12.863 million for Harris County Psychiatric Hospital renovations; $900,000 for Terrell fencing; about $7.380 million for the Civil Commitment Office’s health-care and supervision shortfall; and roughly $970,000 with 34 positions for abuse, neglect and exploitation backlogs. Separately, it authorizes 414 positions for newly renovated state mental-health hospitals using previously appropriated money. These provisions do not themselves expand Medicaid eligibility. Article 2.

The law redirects an estimated $43.431 million of earlier El Paso hospital funding to crisis-service facilities and operations, with legislative intent to use $2.774 million for operations and the rest for one-time construction. It changes specifications in the 2023 hospital appropriation: the Lubbock maximum-security facility moves to the John Montford prison unit; Terrell’s planned replacement increases to 275 beds and Wichita Falls’s to 225; and the old El Paso 50-bed descriptor is removed. The approximately $2.154 billion reproduced in that amended 2023 provision is not a fresh appropriation of that whole amount. Article 9 separately carries forward remaining earlier hospital-project balances. Original 2023 appropriation.

Laboratory expansion uses $205 million in federal reimbursements plus additional reimbursements received during the spending window, capped at about $123.333 million. The corresponding $328.333 million capital authority is permission to use those funds for capital work, not another appropriation to add on top.

Water, parks, transportation and energy

Article 6 provides $1.038 billion in general revenue for water infrastructure and supply projects and grants; another $581 million in general revenue for specific projects and grants; and $881 million from the Texas water fund for transfer to other board-administered funds/accounts. Separate clean-water and drinking-water revolving-fund amounts of about $48.271 million and $82.990 million are intended to draw federal matching funds, with a report due by August 31, 2027. It also provides $150 million for the Alamo, $100 million for well plugging, $60 million for local parks grants, $21.4 million for Parks and Wildlife headquarters repairs, $5.643 million from specified dedicated funds for capital construction, $2 million for the Texas State Aquarium Wildlife Rescue Center, and smaller agricultural-laboratory and office projects. Article 6.

Article 7 provides $250 million for railroad grade-separation grants, conditioned on authorizing legislation. SB1555 became law; its grant program requires at least 10 percent of project costs from a nonstate source and covers qualifying local road or pedestrian crossings. Other items include $106.8 million for aviation services, including $40 million for Lubbock Reese improvements; $22 million for Texarkana airport; $20 million for specified State Highway 99 access-road improvements in Fort Bend County; $15 million for an aircraft hangar; $68 million for the unemployment compensation fund; and about $30.794 million for vocational rehabilitation and federal maintenance-of-effort requirements. The $52 million aircraft-purchase appropriation is reduced by proceeds from the specified aircraft/property sales—it is not $52 million plus unlimited sales proceeds. SB1555 final law; history.

Article 8 transfers and appropriates one $350 million funding amount for advanced-nuclear grants and necessary staff support, contingent on HB14, which became law. The transfer into the dedicated fund and appropriation out of it are not separate $350 million expenditures. It also supports the lottery/bingo transfer to licensing regulators, including agreements, quarterly transition reports and $2.5 million for operations, contingent on SB3070, which became law. Funeral and plumbing regulators receive restricted office funding; they may not raise fees or taxes in fiscal 2025–27 to offset those office appropriations. HB14; SB3070.

Justice, public safety and government operations

Article 5 adds $566.437 million for prison operations and managed health care, including $336.437 million for hospital/clinical care; $301 million for dormitory construction within existing prison fencing; $226.299 million for construction and major repairs; $110 million to buy the Dalby facility; and $30 million for Memorial Unit water/wastewater systems. Another $30 million for Hospital Galveston renovations requires a one-to-one cost-sharing agreement with UTMB. Juvenile justice receives $104 million to complete new facilities, $13.3 million to reimburse counties holding youths when state capacity is unavailable, $5 million for safety/maintenance, and $675,000 for inspector-general staffing costs. The facility rider retains planning/reporting requirements but removes its obsolete August 2024 submission deadline. Military-facility and public-safety building, lock and camera projects are also funded. Article 4 provides $5.1 million for county indigent-defense grants and $2.5 million for judicial-conduct office space, and allows up to $18,000 in additional annual salary for each business-court judge for fiscal 2025 from existing appropriations. Articles 4–5.

Article 1’s major items include $1.02 billion from general revenue and the highway fund for Employees Retirement System legacy liabilities; $300 million deposited to the space research trust fund; $100 million for courthouse preservation; $177.2 million to address the federal crime-victim-funding shortfall; $40.454 million transferred to the crime-victims account; $64.008 million for disaster needs/invoices; $95 million in local major-event preparation grants; $20 million for university research recruiting grants; and $149 million for Texas Tech electromagnetic-pulse and cybersecurity infrastructure. It also provides $7.491 million and fiscal-2025 authority for 28 positions to establish the education savings account program; $9.5 million for outside counsel in the specified children’s-rights litigation; defense-community grants; law-enforcement training; and $5 million for bullet-resistant police-vehicle grants under HB2217, which became law.

State-building items include $121 million for replacement of the State Insurance Building, $75 million for Senate facilities, $50.9 million for the Rudder Building, $47.163 million for warehouse/server/storage/office facilities, $20 million for the governor’s mansion, relocation and temporary-space funds, records digitization and maintenance. Some carry additional conditions: specified comptroller-office funds require a five-day in-office policy; Senate-facility spending requires the lieutenant governor’s prior approval. The law also carries forward an estimated $104.498 million from the earlier Bullock museum appropriation into the state-buildings preservation endowment, and permits cancer-research grant-management technology spending/transfers from existing funds.

Two contingencies especially matter. The $250 million semiconductor transfer/appropriation depends on SB1758 or similar legislation; SB1758 became law without the governor’s signature, and spending still requires Legislative Budget Board approval, with the stated 30-day deemed-approval process. The separate $250 million film-incentive fallback applies only if SB22, HB4568 or similar legislation failed to become law. SB22 did become law, so do not count that fallback as activated funding. SB1758 history; SB22 history; HB2217.

Reused balances, technology and spending controls

Article 9 extends earlier unspent balances for hospital and health-system work, school safety and library regulation, university research/cancer/maritime facilities, parks, disaster matching funds, public-safety licensing/training facilities, courts, buildings and other named projects. Its figures are estimates of earlier balances, including several estimated at zero—not a list of wholly new appropriations. It preserves already-obligated American Rescue Plan funds for their obligated purposes. The Hobby Building sale proceeds must be spent first on Capitol Complex Phase 2 and within two years of the sale closing, while an equal $53.299 million general-revenue appropriation is reduced. Article 9.

Article 10 funds 88 named technology items plus capital authority. These cover statewide accounting, cybersecurity and data centers; child-protection case management/background checks; health data and contracts; education investigations and Windham connectivity; judicial case systems; prison records, broadband and surveillance; driver-license services; environmental/railroad reporting; vehicle registration/title replacement; unemployment systems; and licensing agencies’ equipment, software and public services. Examples include $125 million for the second phase of vehicle registration/title replacement, about $97 million for public-safety disaster recovery/modernization, $58.3 million for prison/parole information systems, and $48.243 million for expanded cybersecurity services. Funding sources vary; not every item comes from unrestricted general revenue. Article 11 separately funds vehicles/boats through 24 numbered allocations, with allocations and capital authority; its military-vehicle provision grants capital authority, not a new $1.05 million appropriation.

Spending reductions include $10 million in Public Finance Authority debt-service appropriations, about $55.025 million in Facilities Commission lease appropriations, and the Military Department’s remaining unspent/unobligated state-active-duty disaster balance, estimated at $159 million, reduced to zero. Article 11 incorporates the applicable general-budget limitations/reporting/transfer provisions and directs agencies to honor legislative purposes. Article 12 appropriates federal receipts for their designated purposes but expressly excludes the specified federal border-security reimbursements. None of these provisions is proof that a project was built, a grant awarded, or all authorized funds spent.

What changed along the way?

The House substitute substantially expanded and reshaped the introduced bill, including space, university, water, child-care, park and nuclear proposals. The Senate substitute then made extensive changes: it replaced or removed several House proposals, added Medicaid and TRS-ActiveCare funding and many facility/technology items, revised water and emergency-response allocations, and changed funding sources. These are committee-substitute changes, not 17 separate enacted floor amendments. Text-version index; introduced; House substitute; Senate substitute.

The amendment index lists 16 House amendments and one Senate amendment, all adopted. Crucially, the House journal places all 16 in Article 9A, an expression of matters to consider when resources or implementation permit—not an appropriation or a binding restriction on an appropriation. The official packet contains the House committee text and these engrossed riders rather than a conventional integrated engrossed bill. “Adopted” alone therefore does not establish that a proposed expenditure became law. Amendment index and every amendment text; House calendar rule, PDF pages 4–6; House adoption and amendments, PDF pages 272–280; official Senate packet.

  • House 1 and 14: Bonnen proposed deleting both $75 million chamber-facility items; Luther proposed redirecting them to $150 million for border operations. The final law retains $75 million for Senate facilities, omits the matching new House-facility item, and does not enact that border redirection. Separate carryforwards of earlier chamber-facility balances remain.
  • House 2: Capriglione proposed moving $10 million from laboratory expansion to Tarrant County mental-health planning. The final bill does not contain that Tarrant grant; its laboratory funding instead uses federal reimbursements as described above.
  • House 3–4: Gervin-Hawkins proposed a $5 million San Antonio Zoo allocation and shifting $3 million from the Alamo to Kress Building renovation. Neither earmark survives in HB500; the final Alamo new appropriation remains $150 million.
  • House 5–8: Harrison proposed school-property-tax compression using $2.5 billion from the water proposal and specified film, semiconductor and enterprise-fund balances. Those tax-compression provisions are not in the final law. That finding does not describe the separate school-finance or tax laws.
  • House 9–10 and 13: Hopper proposed redirecting a $275,000 Ethics Commission technology item to border operations and using withheld attorney-general salary balances for backpay. Luther proposed redirecting film-program balances to border operations. Those border/backpay provisions do not survive in HB500. The Ethics Commission item itself is absent from the final bill.
  • House 11–12: Howard proposed a SHARS school-health funding plan/report; Lalani proposed $2.64 million for unmatched medical-student residencies, offset by a reduction in DPS vehicle funding. Those provisions are absent from the final law, as is the House’s $934.5 million SHARS appropriation.
  • House 15–16: Martinez Fischer proposed geographic-distribution guidance/reporting for railroad grants; Vasut proposed reserving at least $205 million of ERS funding for a contingent one-time retiree payment. Neither requirement survives. The final ERS item is for legacy liabilities, not that proposed supplemental benefit.

The Senate’s Huffman amendment added the $120 million Texas Tech reactor/desalination item and its special vote condition, $5 million for contingent bullet-resistant vehicle grants, $4 million for the Panhandle behavioral-health workforce, $5 million for UTMB aging technology, $2 million for A&M–Central Texas military transition, and $2 million for aquarium wildlife rescue. Those six funding items survive in Sections 1.34, 3.20–3.23 and 6.10. The House concurred in the Senate amendments May 30; there was no conference report to treat as a separate final version. Huffman amendment; history.

For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.

Official bill versions

Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.

Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?

Potential beneficiaries include school systems, insured school employees, patients and care providers, volunteer firefighters, water-project communities, university researchers, justice agencies and people relying on their services. Contractors and grant recipients may receive work or funding, but an appropriation is not a guaranteed award or completed outcome. State taxpayers and the named dedicated funds bear the financing and opportunity costs. Local participation can require money or administrative work: for example, the railroad grants require a nonstate contribution, and the retained 2023 mental-health grant rules include local matching requirements.

The May 29 Legislative Budget Board note estimated a $13.187 billion negative net impact on general-revenue-related funds through August 31, 2027, and separately a $13.333 billion reduction in funds available for budget certification. These are different accounting measures, not interchangeable all-funds spending totals. The certification calculation includes only about $571.821 million of the school-program appropriation because the remainder was already reflected in the revenue estimate; it also treats specified dedicated accounts differently. Both estimates predate the governor’s $50 million veto. This briefing does not present them as an updated post-veto cash-spending total. The note anticipated no significant fiscal implication to local-government units; that forecast does not erase the grant matching conditions. Final indexed fiscal note.

Earlier fiscal estimates described earlier versions. Likewise, the March actuarial statements assessed the proposed additional $1 billion ERS contribution under continuing-payment assumptions; their projected savings and earlier full-funding date are not guaranteed effects of the differently worded final legacy-payment provision. This explanation reviews the enacted appropriations and conditions, not subsequent agency spending, certification of every contingent recipient, federal facility clearance, or measured program results.

Official sources

Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.