2025 Texas sessionsRegular and both called sessions have ended. This index covers House and Senate bills, not resolutions. Statuses come from official reports.

← Back to bills

2025 · Regular session · House bill

HB549

HB549, the Westyn Bryan Mandrell Act, requires a school district to make at least one suitable airway-clearance device available at each district campus—but only when the district can obtain it through a device donation in its or…

Read bill highlights ↓

Official caption: Relating to the availability and use of airway clearance devices at public school campuses and to contracts for medication for respiratory distress and training at public schools.

Signed by governorSource-checked explanation published

Official report lists House author(s): Vasut. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.

Report an error ↗

Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.

Bill highlights

Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.

Read the full explanation ↓

What does it do?

HB549, the Westyn Bryan Mandrell Act, requires a school district to make at least one suitable airway-clearance device available at each district campus—but only when the district can obtain it through a device donation in its original packaging, or through purchase or lease using money appropriated or donated for that purpose. It is not an unconditional instruction for every campus to buy a device from ordinary funds. The device must be appropriate for most students on that campus; the principal must consider where students primarily eat when choosing its storage location. Final law.

Where a required device is stored, the district must ensure a campus or district employee trained in its proper use is present whenever a substantial number of students are there. Storage and use must follow manufacturer specifications and applicable law. Districts may solicit gifts, grants and donations. The provision does not create a new liability or cause of action against districts or their officers/employees, or waive the immunities identified in the act. It defines an airway-clearance device as a noninvasive device capable of removing or helping remove a foreign-body airway obstruction; it does not prescribe a brand or give clinical instructions.

A separate provision permits school districts, open-enrollment charter schools and private schools to contract with a vendor for respiratory-distress medication, related equipment, and training for personnel and volunteers already authorized to administer that medication. This contracting permission has a broader school scope than the district-campus device requirement. The bill was signed and took effect June 20, 2025; it applies beginning with the 2025–2026 school year. History.

What changed along the way?

The introduced bill and House committee version contained the conditional device, training, storage and liability provisions. Vasut’s adopted House third-reading amendment added the name “Westyn Bryan Mandrell Act.” Johnson’s adopted Senate amendment added the separate respiratory-medication/equipment/training contracting authority. Both appear in the final law; the House concurred in the Senate change May 30. No other amendments are listed. Introduced text; amendment index; House naming amendment; Senate contracting amendment.

For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.

Official bill versions

Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.

Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?

Students and staff at participating campuses gain access to the equipment and trained personnel described in the law. Districts face storage, training and staffing responsibilities where the conditional requirement applies; donors and designated funds may pay acquisition costs. Vendors gain an express contracting route for respiratory-care supplies and training. The law does not itself appropriate money, guarantee a device at every campus regardless of funding, or establish a measured medical benefit.

The Legislative Budget Board anticipated no significant state or local fiscal impact and assumed costs could be absorbed with existing resources. It did not quantify campus-by-campus acquisition, training or replacement costs. Latest indexed fiscal note, May 29, 2025.

Official sources

Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.