2025 Texas sessionsRegular and both called sessions have ended. This index covers House and Senate bills, not resolutions. Statuses come from official reports.

← Back to bills and search results

2025 · Regular session · House bill

HB5650

HB5650 creates Travis County Municipal Utility District No. 40 with general municipal-utility-district powers and authority for roads and related drainage.

Read bill highlights ↓

Official caption: Relating to the creation of the Travis County Municipal Utility District No. 40; granting a limited power of eminent domain; providing authority to issue bonds; providing authority to impose assessments, fees, and taxes.

Became law without signatureSource-checked explanation published

Official report lists House author(s): Flores. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.

Report an error ↗

Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.

Bill highlights

Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.

Read the full explanation ↓

What does it do?

HB5650 creates Travis County Municipal Utility District No. 40 with general municipal-utility-district powers and authority for roads and related drainage. Its initial territory is three specifically described tracts totaling about 56.62 acres in the Augustus Kincheloe Survey near FM1327, U.S.183 and Tom Sassman Road. The statutory boundary description controls; this is not a countywide district.

Creation must be confirmed by district voters, who also elect five permanent directors. Before that election, every municipality whose boundaries or extraterritorial jurisdiction includes district land must give the required consent. Owners representing a majority of assessed real-property value may petition the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality to appoint five named temporary directors. Permanent directors have staggered four-year terms. Road projects must meet applicable city or county requirements; state-maintained roads require Texas Transportation Commission approval.

Property taxes and property-tax-backed bonds need voter approval. Road bonds backed by property taxes require approval by two-thirds of voters participating, and their principal at issuance may not exceed one-fourth of assessed real-property value. Revenue-backed or specified contract-payment bonds can be issued without a bond election, but the underlying contract tax needs its own voter approval. The operating-tax rate cannot exceed the approved rate; the separate continuing tax for outstanding tax-backed debt has no statutory rate or amount limit in this act.

The bill became law without the governor’s signature on June 20, 2025, effective immediately. Its two-thirds legislative vote condition was met (House102–46; Senate27–4), so the fallback provision denying eminent-domain power did not take effect. This does not exempt the district from applicable general-law limits on taking property. Sources: final law, including boundaries and votes and history.

What changed along the way?

The operative text, including all three boundary descriptions, is unchanged across the introduced, House committee, House-passed, Senate committee and enrolled versions. Both committees reported without amendments, and the amendment index lists none. History records a corrected Senate committee report, not an adopted substantive amendment; comparison of the published texts found no operative change.

For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.

Official bill versions

Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.

Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?

Landowners, developers and future occupants could benefit from a local way to finance utility and road infrastructure. District taxpayers and customers could bear taxes, assessments, fees and debt-service costs; affected property owners may also face lawful acquisition proceedings. The law authorizes tools, not a particular project, tax rate, bond issue or completed confirmation election.

The latest fiscal note and introduced fiscal note expect no significant state impact and no fiscal impact on other local governments. They say the district’s own financial impact cannot be determined because future use of eminent domain, bonds, assessments, fees and taxes is unknown. That is not a finding that residents will pay nothing.

Official sources

Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.