2025 · Regular session · House bill
HB5666
HB5666 creates the Fenske Road Municipal Utility District of Harris County for a described 33.7594-acre tract in the Jacob Duckworth Survey along Fenske Road.
Official caption: Relating to the creation of the Fenske Road Municipal Utility District of Harris County; granting a limited power of eminent domain; providing authority to issue bonds; providing authority to impose assessments, fees, and taxes.
Official report lists House author(s): Oliverson. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.
Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.
Bill highlights
Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.
- HB5666 creates the Fenske Road Municipal Utility District of Harris County for a described 33.7594-acre tract in the Jacob Duckworth Survey along Fenske Road.
- District voters must confirm creation and elect five permanent directors.
- Property taxes and tax-backed bonds require voter approval.
- The district may not exercise eminent domain: Although the initial House vote was 101–47 and the Senate vote 27–4, the final House concurrence vote was 93–44, below two-thirds of all elected members.
What does it do?
HB5666 creates the Fenske Road Municipal Utility District of Harris County for a described 33.7594-acre tract in the Jacob Duckworth Survey along Fenske Road. It receives general municipal-utility-district powers and authority for roads and related drainage. The statutory boundary description controls; it does not cover all property along the road or all Harris County.
District voters must confirm creation and elect five permanent directors. Required municipal consent must precede that election. The temporary directors named in the final act are McCay Dickson, Joseph Taylor, Michael Foreman, Alex Brown and Monica Bueso. Their terms end at permanent elections or the fourth anniversary of the effective date, whichever comes first, with successor appointments provided if needed. Permanent directors serve staggered four-year terms. Districts formed by lawful division inherit this chapter’s powers and duties.
Property taxes and tax-backed bonds require voter approval. Tax-backed road bonds require approval by two-thirds of participating district voters and are capped at issuance at one-fourth of assessed real-property value. Specified revenue- and contract-payment-backed obligations do not need a separate bond election, but contract taxes require voter approval of the underlying contract. Operating-tax rates are limited to the approved rate; the separate continuing tax for outstanding tax-backed bonds has no rate or amount ceiling specified here. Applicable city/county road standards remain, with state approval for state-operated and maintained roads.
The district may not exercise eminent domain. Although the initial House vote was 101–47 and the Senate vote 27–4, the final House concurrence vote was 93–44, below two-thirds of all elected members. That activates the bill’s no-eminent-domain provision and prevents immediate effect. The bill became law without the governor’s signature June 20, 2025, effective September 1, 2025. Sources: final law, boundaries and vote certificates and history.
What changed along the way?
The introduced, House committee and House-passed texts provided for the initial directors to be appointed by TCEQ on a petition from owners representing a majority of assessed real-property value. The Senate substitute instead named the five temporary directors directly. The House concurred; the substitute’s operative text matches the final law. The boundary description and remaining powers were unchanged.
The amendment index lists no separate floor amendments. The no-eminent-domain outcome follows the existing vote condition, not a new prohibition inserted by the substitute. The caption’s reference to a limited power does not override the final voting result.
For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.
Official bill versions
Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.
Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?
Landowners, developers and future occupants could benefit from district-financed infrastructure. District taxpayers and customers could bear taxes, assessments, fees and debt-service costs. Authority to finance projects does not establish a particular project, tax rate, completed confirmation election or bond issue.
All five indexed fiscal notes were reviewed. The final note anticipates no significant state impact and no impact on other local governments, but cannot determine the district’s fiscal impact because future bonds, assessments, fees and taxes are unknown. Earlier notes’ references to possible eminent domain do not establish an enacted power to condemn property.
Official sources
- Bill history and latest recorded action
- Bill versions, analyses and fiscal notes
- Action history and votes
- Amendment index
Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.