← Back to bills and search results
2025 · Regular session · House bill
HB5682
HB5682 creates Colmena Ranch Municipal Management District No. 1 in Collin County.
Official caption: Relating to the creation of the Colmena Ranch Municipal Management District No. 1; granting a limited power of eminent domain; providing authority to issue bonds; providing authority to impose assessments and fees.
Official report lists House author(s): Richardson. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.
Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.
Bill highlights
Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.
- HB5682 creates Colmena Ranch Municipal Management District No. 1 in Collin County.
- The district can finance and provide public improvements and services such as water, wastewater, drainage, roads, recreation and parking.
- The district cannot impose property taxes, but that does not make its services free.
- Before issuing bonds, notes or other obligations under its financing subchapter, the district must have a contract providing adequate supplemental police, fire and emergency services.
- Initial directors Eric Burton, Mike Alley and Jacob Thompson have terms ending June 1, 2027; Rodney Price and David Medis have terms ending June 1, 2029.
- The act became law without the governor's signature June 20, 2025, effective September 1, 2025.
What does it do?
HB5682 creates Colmena Ranch Municipal Management District No. 1 in Collin County. Its five described tracts total 2,450.793 acres around FM 543, the Collin County Outer Loop and Honey Creek. The statutory descriptions determine which properties are included; this is not an independent survey or ownership determination.
The district can finance and provide public improvements and services such as water, wastewater, drainage, roads, recreation and parking. It can contract for law enforcement, establish a nonprofit corporation to assist with projects, and support economic development through loans, grants, personnel and services. District services must supplement—not replace—the county’s existing services. Eligibility for tax-increment or tax-abatement zones does not itself establish those zones.
The district cannot impose property taxes, but that does not make its services free. It may impose assessments and fees and issue obligations backed by assessments, impact fees, revenue, contract payments, grants or other district money. An assessment-financed service or improvement requires a petition from owners representing a majority of assessed property value subject to assessment. Assessments can become personal liabilities and property liens. The usual Chapter 375 exemption for certain residential property does not apply, so homeowners cannot assume that exemption protects them from assessments or impact fees.
Before issuing bonds, notes or other obligations under its financing subchapter, the district must have a contract providing adequate supplemental police, fire and emergency services. Collin County’s commissioners court must review and approve the adequacy of those services. The contract may also condition effectiveness on district-voter approval; the act does not mandate that extra election for every such contract. Specified revenue- or contract-payment-backed bonds may be issued without an election. A separate assessment-backed financing route is available for improvements to be conveyed to or operated and maintained by a municipality or retail utility provider under a prior agreement.
Initial directors Eric Burton, Mike Alley and Jacob Thompson have terms ending June 1, 2027; Rodney Price and David Medis have terms ending June 1, 2029. The five elected directors serve staggered four-year terms. Compensation is capped at $150 per board meeting and $7,200 per director per year, plus necessary and reasonable expense reimbursement. The district can add or exclude land under the cited general laws and may divide only without outstanding bonded debt. New districts cannot initially extend outside the act’s territory. Dissolution can follow a board vote or a qualifying two-thirds property-owner petition, but debts, contractual payments and responsibility for public facilities must be addressed first.
The act became law without the governor’s signature June 20, 2025, effective September 1, 2025. The district cannot use eminent domain: the House’s 82–53 concurrence vote was below the two-thirds threshold, activating the prohibition rather than the conditional grant. Initial House passage was 83–48 and Senate passage was 27–4. Sources: enrolled act and certified votes and official history and effective-date remarks.
What changed along the way?
The introduced bill, House committee report and House-passed text have the same operative text. The property-tax prohibition, residential-exemption exception and emergency-services financing condition were present from introduction.
The Senate substitute added the limitations of Water Code 54.209 to the proposed eminent-domain power. Its operative text matches the enrolled act. However, the final votes activated the separate prohibition, so the district did not acquire that proposed power. The amendment index lists no floor amendments. This was a committee-substitute change, not a separately listed floor amendment. The text index provides all five versions.
For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.
Official bill versions
Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.
Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?
Landowners, developers, businesses and residents could benefit from financed infrastructure and services. Property owners and users may bear assessments, fees and debt-related costs even though the district cannot impose property taxes. Assessments carry enforceable liens and personal liability. The county-approved supplemental emergency-services contract is a condition on borrowing, not a promise that particular staffing or response times already exist. No actual project, borrowing or household charge is established by this review.
The latest May 29 fiscal note anticipates no significant state fiscal effect, assuming costs can be absorbed with existing resources. It cannot determine district costs because future actions and financing are unknown, and anticipates no fiscal effect on other local governments. All earlier indexed notes were reviewed. Their generic references to taxes and eminent domain do not override the enacted property-tax and eminent-domain prohibitions. None provides a dollar estimate or household bill.
The residential exception was checked against the official September 1, 2025 text of Local Government Code 375.161, which ordinarily protects specified single-family and small multifamily property, subject to its own exceptions. HB5682 makes that section inapplicable to this district.
Official sources
- Bill history and latest recorded action
- Bill versions, analyses and fiscal notes
- Action history and votes
- Amendment index
Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.