← Back to bills and search results
2025 · Regular session · House bill
HB5693
HB5693 moves Jefferson County Drainage District No. 7 commissioner elections to the uniform November election date in odd-numbered years.
Official caption: Relating to the election of the commissioners of the Jefferson County Drainage District No. 7.
Official report lists House author(s): Manuel. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.
Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.
Bill highlights
Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.
- HB5693 moves Jefferson County Drainage District No. 7 commissioner elections to the uniform November election date in odd-numbered years.
- The transition calls for two commissioner elections in November 2025 and three in November 2027.
- The governor signed the act June 20, 2025; it took effect September 1, 2025.
What does it do?
HB5693 moves Jefferson County Drainage District No. 7 commissioner elections to the uniform November election date in odd-numbered years. The district still has five commissioners serving staggered four-year terms. It retains the rule that no more than one commissioner may be elected from a municipality while five municipalities exist within the district, as well as the majority-quorum requirement.
The transition calls for two commissioner elections in November 2025 and three in November 2027. Commissioners elected in May 2022 remain until their successors qualify after the November 2025 election; commissioners elected in May 2024 remain until their successors qualify after the November 2027 election. Each successor receives a four-year term. This does not mean all five seats are elected together or that incumbents immediately leave office when the law takes effect.
The governor signed the act June 20, 2025; it took effect September 1, 2025. It changes election timing and the transition, not the district’s tax rates or drainage-project powers. Sources: enrolled act and official history.
What changed along the way?
The law replaces Section 4’s general election reference to Water Code Chapter 49, Subchapter D, with an explicit November odd-year schedule and supplies the transition rules. Those are changes to existing law, not amendments added during this bill’s passage.
The introduced bill, House committee report, House-passed text, Senate committee report and enrolled law have identical operative text; differences are printing and certifications. Both committees reported without amendments. The amendment index lists none, and the text index identifies all five versions. Passage votes were 109–22, with two present but not voting, in the House and 30–1 in the Senate.
For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.
Official bill versions
Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.
Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?
District voters, candidates, commissioners and election administrators are directly affected by the changed calendar. The transitional service periods keep sitting commissioners in office until successors qualify. Changing election timing may affect participation and administration, but the official materials reviewed do not quantify those effects or establish that the scheduled elections have occurred.
The May 5 introduced fiscal note and May 21 engrossed fiscal note anticipate no state fiscal implication and no significant local-government fiscal implication. They do not give a dollar estimate, promise election savings or say all administrative work is cost-free.
Official sources
- Bill history and latest recorded action
- Bill versions, analyses and fiscal notes
- Action history and votes
- Amendment index
Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.