2025 Texas sessionsRegular and both called sessions have ended. This index covers House and Senate bills, not resolutions. Statuses come from official reports.

← Back to bills and search results

2025 · Regular session · House bill

HB5699

HB5699 lets Harris County Municipal Utility District No. 405 contract with an owner of undeveloped property to remove that property from the district on terms the board considers advantageous.

Read bill highlights ↓

Official caption: Relating to the authority of the Harris County Municipal Utility District No. 405 to exclude territory; validating and confirming all previous acts of the district.

Became law without signatureSource-checked explanation published

Official report lists House author(s): Schofield. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.

Report an error ↗

Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.

Bill highlights

Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.

Read the full explanation ↓

What does it do?

HB5699 lets Harris County Municipal Utility District No. 405 contract with an owner of undeveloped property to remove that property from the district on terms the board considers advantageous. The district may issue an exclusion order only after those conditions are satisfied and must record it in Harris County’s property records. The act does not automatically remove any named parcel.

Exclusion does not erase the property’s share of district debt. Until that share is paid in full, the owner remains obligated, statutory liens continue, and the district must collect debt-service taxes at the same rate charged to property still inside the district. Those receipts remain pledged to debt and must be applied exclusively to the excluded property’s share. The exclusion contract must state the amount or how it is calculated. An owner of any part of the excluded property may pay the remaining share in full; full payment releases the property from district debt-service taxes.

Subject to the contract and statutory debt provisions, excluded land is no longer part of the district or entitled to its services. Bondholder rights cannot be impaired. The district may issue still-unissued bonds, notes or other obligations approved by district voters before exclusion without a new authorization election. This preserves prior voter authorization; it is not a general exemption for debt never approved by voters.

The district keeps its preexisting powers and duties. The act validates earlier governmental acts and proceedings, but excludes matters already held invalid by final judgment and matters in litigation on the effective date that ultimately are held invalid by final judgment. It does not simply erase those court protections.

The act became law without the governor’s signature June 20, 2025, effective September 1, 2025. Passage votes were 91–40, with two present but not voting, in the House and 28–3 in the Senate. Sources: enrolled law and official history.

What changed along the way?

The introduced bill already provided contractual exclusion, continued debt responsibility, bondholder protection, prior-election reliance and validation with court exceptions. The House committee substitute reorganized the exclusion and financing provisions into a new Special District Local Laws Code chapter, consolidated debt-tax rules and made the contract/order conditions explicit. Its prior-election provision also inserted wording limiting issuance to before exclusion.

Schofield’s adopted House floor amendment removed that issuance-timing phrase and placed the specific exclusion reference after the requirement for prior voter approval. The final rule therefore requires approval before exclusion, not issuance before exclusion. The amendment index lists this one amendment, adopted May 16.

The House-passed text, Senate committee report and final act match in operative text. The Senate reported without amendments. All versions are in the text index.

For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.

Official bill versions

Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.

Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?

Owners of undeveloped land gain a negotiated path out of the district, not a unilateral right to leave or an immediate escape from debt taxes. Remaining taxpayers and creditors receive protections through continued debt payments and preserved bondholder rights. Actual effects depend on contracts, debt allocations, exclusion orders and repayment; this review does not establish that any particular parcel has left or quantify an owner’s obligation.

The May 6 introduced fiscal note, May 8 substitute note and May 22 engrossed note anticipate no state fiscal implication and no significant local-government fiscal implication. They give no dollar estimate and do not mean excluded owners owe nothing.

Official sources

Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.