2025 Texas sessionsRegular and both called sessions have ended. This index covers House and Senate bills, not resolutions. Statuses come from official reports.

← Back to bills and search results

2025 · Regular session · House bill

HB700

HB700 regulates certain business financing repaid from a percentage of sales or revenue, including fixed payments that can be reconciled to that percentage.

Read bill highlights ↓

Official caption: Relating to disclosures for certain commercial sales-based financing transactions, the effect of certain commercial sales-based financing contract provisions, and the registration of commercial sales-based financing brokers and providers; authorizing a fee and providing a civil penalty.

Signed by governorSource-checked explanation published

Official report lists House author(s): McQueeney. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.

Report an error ↗

Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.

Bill highlights

Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.

Read the full explanation ↓

What does it do?

HB700 regulates certain business financing repaid from a percentage of sales or revenue, including fixed payments that can be reconciled to that percentage. It is not a consumer-loan law: the proceeds must not be primarily for personal, family or household use. Covered online providers and brokers serving Texans are included even without a Texas office. Final law

For a specific financing offer under $1 million, the provider must disclose the financing amount, actual disbursement excluding withheld finance charges, dollar finance charge, total repayment, estimated repayment period, payment amounts and frequency—or the variable-payment method and projected monthly average. Required disclosures also cover other potential fees, early-payoff or refinancing charges, collateral, and whether the provider pays a broker and how much. If obtaining new financing requires paying off existing financing, the provider must disclose the new funds used for prepayment charges or unforgiven interest/finance charges and the amount that reduces the cash actually disbursed. The recipient must sign the required disclosures before the application is finalized. This is not a statutory requirement to quote an annual percentage rate.

Both providers and brokers doing covered business for compensation must register with the Office of Consumer Credit Commissioner (OCCC), pay cost-covering registration fees, renew annually by January 31 after initial registration, and update changed information within 90 days. Registration requires business and service-agent details and specified legal/disciplinary history involving the business and its controllers, officers or directors.

A financing contract containing a confession-of-judgment provision—or a similar provision—is void and unenforceable. Such provisions generally allow judgment without the usual opportunity to contest the claim. Automatic withdrawals from a recipient’s deposit account are prohibited unless the provider or broker has a validly perfected security interest in that account with first priority over everyone else’s claims under Texas commercial law. That is a substantial condition, not blanket permission to debit an account.

OCCC administers the chapter and can take enforcement actions for the listed rule, disclosure and registration violations, suspend or terminate registrations, and assess civil penalties. A chapter violation carries a $10,000 civil penalty per violation. The chapter itself creates no private right to sue. The Finance Commission must adopt rules against specified unfair, deceptive or abusive practices, but may not set a maximum APR, finance charge or fee for these transactions.

Exemptions include banks, credit unions and their affiliates; qualifying technology-service providers that have no interest or agreement to purchase the financing; Farm Credit lenders; real-estate-secured transactions; leases; qualifying financing plans of at least $50,000 for vehicle dealers/rental businesses; and specified financing connected to the seller’s or affiliate’s products or services. The law also excludes sales-based financing from Finance Code 306.103’s special treatment of account purchases; that section otherwise treats the discount as not interest and the parties’ purchase characterization as conclusive. This does not itself resolve every transaction’s treatment under other lending laws. Account-purchase statute

The act took effect September 1, 2025, but gives providers and brokers already doing business on that date until December 31, 2026 to register. Initial rules, fee rules and registration forms were due by September 1, 2026. Those are statutory deadlines, not a claim here that every implementation step has been completed. Official history

What changed along the way?

The introduced bill and indexed House committee text had identical operative provisions. They assigned administration to the Department of Banking, required disclosures for offers over $500,000, expressly treated financing fees as interest for usury purposes, registered brokers, and capped aggregate civil penalties at $100,000. Those are not the final rules.

The House adopted McQueeney’s amendment, moving oversight to OCCC, changing the disclosure threshold to under $1 million, adding broker-compensation and broader refinancing disclosures, legal-history reporting, the confession-of-judgment contract restriction and unfair-practice rulemaking. It removed the express fees-as-interest sentence, the separate purchase-money-obligation exemption, the aggregate penalty cap and the provision making violations actionable as deceptive trade practices. It also delayed implementation deadlines. Plesa’s adopted amendment to that amendment added the prohibition on agency rate/fee caps.

The Senate’s adopted Perry amendment distinguished brokers from providers, expressly covered both in registration and other provisions, specified enforcement grounds and unfair-practice rulemaking, and added the first-priority-security requirement for automatic debits. The House concurred May 28; the governor signed June 20. All three indexed amendments were adopted; there was no conference version. Amendment index

For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.

Official bill versions

Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.

Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?

Business owners may better compare cash received with total repayment and understand refinancing costs, broker incentives and automatic-payment restrictions. Those are potential benefits, not guaranteed cheaper financing. Exempt transactions and offers outside the disclosure threshold limit the reach of particular protections; the law bars agency price caps and does not create a new private lawsuit.

Covered providers and brokers bear registration, reporting, disclosure and compliance costs and potential civil penalties. The debit rule may require changes to collection arrangements. Whether these costs affect prices or availability of financing is not quantified in the official fiscal analysis.

The latest fiscal note says the overall fiscal impact cannot be determined because registrations, fee amounts and civil-penalty revenue are uncertain. OCCC and the Finance Commission fund their own operations without imposing costs on General Revenue; state legal/court work was expected to fit existing resources, with no significant local-government fiscal impact anticipated. Importantly, that note retains outdated policy descriptions, including “more than $500,000” offers and deceptive-trade-practice language. The explanation above follows the enacted text, not that stale description.

Official sources

Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.