2025 Texas sessionsRegular and both called sessions have ended. This index covers House and Senate bills, not resolutions. Statuses come from official reports.

← Back to bills and search results

2025 · Regular session · House bill

HB713

HB713 creates a narrow exception to professional reporting requirements for health care providers, expressly including nurses, who review information in a case selected under Texas's maternal mortality and morbidity review law.

Read bill highlights ↓

Official caption: Relating to an exception to certain reporting requirements for health care providers reviewing selected cases for the Texas Maternal Mortality and Morbidity Review Committee.

Signed by governorSource-checked explanation published

Official report lists House author(s): Howard, Johnson. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.

Report an error ↗

Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.

Bill highlights

Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.

Read the full explanation ↓

What does it do?

HB713 creates a narrow exception to professional reporting requirements for health care providers, expressly including nurses, who review information in a case selected under Texas’s maternal mortality and morbidity review law. If a reviewer learns through that review of conduct related to the reviewer’s profession that normally must be reported, the reviewer is exempt from that reporting requirement for the reviewed information. Final law

The setting matters. Chapter 34 provides for review of pregnancy-related deaths and, when feasible, selected severe maternal complications. This is not a general exemption from reporting professional misconduct learned during ordinary patient care. Nor does HB713 itself erase liability for the underlying conduct or declare that conduct lawful. Its operative change concerns the reviewer’s reporting obligation in this particular review process. Review framework and new Section 34.0085

The law took effect June 20, 2025, immediately upon the governor’s approval, because it received the required two-thirds vote in both chambers. Official history

What changed along the way?

The introduced bill, House committee report, engrossed bill, Senate committee report and enrolled law contain the same operative language. Both committees reported it without amendments, and the official amendment index lists none. There was no conference rewrite. The final recorded votes were 105–34 in the House, with one present but not voting, and 28–3 in the Senate.

For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.

Official bill versions

Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.

Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?

Health professionals participating in the review process gain clarity that reviewing a selected case does not itself trigger a separate professional reporting duty for the information reviewed. That may support candid participation and attention to preventing future deaths or serious complications. Those are potential practical benefits, not a measured outcome promised by the law.

The tradeoff is that this review channel will not necessarily generate the professional reports that the same information might otherwise require. The exemption is limited to the reviewed information; it is not a general shield against other investigations or independently applicable obligations outside that setting.

The latest fiscal note anticipated no significant state or local-government fiscal impact, assuming any costs could be absorbed with existing resources. HB713 does not appropriate money or establish a new treatment benefit.

Official sources

Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.