2025 Texas sessionsRegular and both called sessions have ended. This index covers House and Senate bills, not resolutions. Statuses come from official reports.

← Back to bills and search results

2025 · Regular session · Senate bill

SB1035

SB1035 gives an agricultural operation’s owner, operator or lessee an express route to challenge unlawful local-government requirements.

Read bill highlights ↓

Official caption: Relating to equitable relief from the enforcement of certain governmental requirements that affect agricultural operations.

Signed by governorSource-checked explanation published

Official report lists Senate author(s): Sparks, Perry. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.

Report an error ↗

Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.

Bill highlights

Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.

Read the full explanation ↓

What does it do?

SB1035 gives an agricultural operation’s owner, operator or lessee an express route to challenge unlawful local-government requirements. If a political subdivision enforces a requirement in violation of Agriculture Code chapter 251 or Article I, section 36 of the Texas Constitution, an aggrieved person in that group may sue the subdivision for declaratory and injunctive relief: a court ruling on the legal issue and an order blocking enforcement. The new section does not itself provide a compensatory-damages award. Final law, section 1.

A person who wins such an action may seek court costs and reasonable attorney’s fees, and the court must award them. Filing a suit alone does not establish a violation or guarantee payment. The defendant under this new action is the political subdivision, not every public agency mentioned elsewhere in agricultural law. Final law, section 1.

The governor signed SB1035 and it took effect immediately on May 19, 2025. The new action applies only to causes of action accruing on or after that date, not automatically every case filed later about older events. History; Final law, sections 2–3.

What changed along the way?

The original and Senate-passed bill allowed declaratory or injunctive relief for a chapter 251 violation and said a prevailing person “may recover” costs and fees. The House committee substitute changed “or” to “and.” Representative Spiller’s sole indexed floor amendment, adopted April 29, defined the eligible plaintiff as an owner, operator or lessee, added constitutional violations, and changed the fee language to “may seek and the court shall award.” The Senate concurred May 5; all these changes survive in the enrolled text. Text versions; Amendment index; Spiller amendment; Final law.

The law adds an enforcement remedy; it does not newly exempt every farm activity from regulation. Chapter 251 already defined agricultural operations and governmental requirements and limited local regulation, with different rules for cities and other subdivisions. It also preserved specified state-law enforcement and injury claims involving unlawful operations. The constitutional right covers generally accepted farm, ranch, timber, horticultural and wildlife-management practices on land a person owns or leases, while preserving legislative authority for specified public-safety, animal-health, crop-protection, natural-resource and public-use measures. Agriculture Code 251.002 (pre-act); Agriculture Code 251.004 (pre-act); Agriculture Code 251.005 (pre-act); Agriculture Code 251.0055 (pre-act); Texas Constitution, Article I, section 36.

For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.

Official bill versions

Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.

Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?

Eligible agricultural owners, operators and tenants can ask a court to stop enforcement that violates the existing statutory or constitutional protections, with a required award of reasonable fees and court costs if they prevail and seek them. Political subdivisions may face defense expenses and an adverse fee award; the outcome still depends on the facts and governing protections and exceptions. Neighbors and communities do not lose every health, safety or environmental protection through this act. Final law; Agriculture Code 251.004 (pre-act); Agriculture Code 251.0055 (pre-act); Texas Constitution, Article I, section 36.

The March 27, April 25 and May 1 fiscal notes anticipate no significant state or local fiscal implication and assume costs can be absorbed with existing resources. The May 1 House-passed note is also posted under the enrolled listing. Those estimates are not a promise of zero litigation expense or an estimate of a particular plaintiff’s recovery. Introduced note; House-substitute note; House-passed note; Note under enrolled listing.

Official sources

Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.