2025 · Regular session · Senate bill
SB1038
SB1038 broadens and reorganizes Texas’s administrative remedies for Medicaid fraud and abuse, while giving people more time to challenge an assessment.
Official caption: Relating to administrative remedies for certain fraud and abuse violations under Medicaid; providing administrative penalties.
Official report lists Senate author(s): Sparks. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.
Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.
Bill highlights
Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.
- SB1038 broadens and reorganizes Texas’s administrative remedies for Medicaid fraud and abuse, while giving people more time to challenge an assessment.
- The administrative violation list now expressly covers false statements or material omissions in claims; false or concealed eligibility/payment information; diverting another person’s benefits; false facility-certification or required information; claims involving unlicensed providers, unapproved or substantially inadequate services, inappropriate products or omitted provider identifiers; knowingly obstructing the inspector general; and knowingly using false records or improperly avoiding obligations to pay the state.
- The ordinary remedy combines recovery and a penalty: Recovery now includes the payment or benefit received directly or indirectly, including payments to third parties, plus judgment-rate interest from payment.
- Missing claim-supporting records have a narrower remedy: the commission chooses either repayment of the claim amount or a penalty up to $500 per violation—not both under that provision.
- A recipient of the initial notice now has 30 rather than 10 days to request informal review.
- Signed May 13, 2025, the act took effect September 1, 2025.
What does it do?
SB1038 broadens and reorganizes Texas’s administrative remedies for Medicaid fraud and abuse, while giving people more time to challenge an assessment. A “claim” now includes an application, request or demand for a Medicaid benefit or payment, not only a health-service payment application from a contracted provider. “Knowingly” includes knowledge, conscious indifference or reckless disregard of information’s truth; proving a specific intent to violate this section is not required to establish that knowledge standard in civil or administrative proceedings. The act also defines “material” as naturally tending to influence or capable of influencing. Final law, sections 2–4; Pre-act HR 32.039.
The administrative violation list now expressly covers false statements or material omissions in claims; false or concealed eligibility/payment information; diverting another person’s benefits; false facility-certification or required information; claims involving unlicensed providers, unapproved or substantially inadequate services, inappropriate products or omitted provider identifiers; knowingly obstructing the inspector general; and knowingly using false records or improperly avoiding obligations to pay the state. It retains referral/inducement restrictions, managed-care contract violations and supporting-documentation duties, and separates other violations defined by commission rule into their own category. The individual provisions specify when knowledge is required; this is not a blanket excuse from recordkeeping or other duties. Nor does the expanded list mean the conduct was previously lawful under every other statute. Final law, section 4, amended 32.039(b); Pre-act HR 36.002.
The ordinary remedy combines recovery and a penalty. Recovery now includes the payment or benefit received directly or indirectly, including payments to third parties, plus judgment-rate interest from payment. The penalty can include up to twice the amount paid, plus a per-violation amount. For injury to a person 65 or older, an adult meeting the statutory disability definition, or someone under 18, that amount has a $5,000 minimum and a $15,000 ceiling unless the referenced federal maximum is higher. For other violations the ceiling is $10,000 unless that federal maximum is higher. The federal reference includes inflation adjustments, so $10,000 and $15,000 are not absolute current ceilings. Each day of the specified obstruction, repayment-obligation or managed-care violation counts separately for this penalty. Final law, section 4, subsections (c)–(c-1); Pre-act HR 48.002; Federal penalty reference.
Missing claim-supporting records have a narrower remedy: the commission chooses either repayment of the claim amount or a penalty up to $500 per violation—not both under that provision. Other rule-defined violations no longer share that special limit. The protection for a commission-calculated and printed voucher remains unless the provider knowingly supplied false or misleading information or knowingly failed to correct it when given an opportunity; signing the voucher alone is not fraud, and rules must allow a correction grace period. Final law, section 4, subsections (c-2)–(d), and section 7; Pre-act HR 32.039.
A recipient of the initial notice now has 30 rather than 10 days to request informal review. After the review results, the deadline to request a formal hearing also increases from 10 to 30 days. Notices must describe administrative and judicial remedies. The existing payment, hearing, judicial-review and enforcement-stay procedures now refer to the full administrative remedy, not just a penalty; filing for review does not by itself mean collection is automatically stayed. Final law, section 4, subsections (f)–(r).
Signed May 13, 2025, the act took effect September 1, 2025. The amended 32.039 applies only to violations occurring on or after that date; earlier violations retain former law. If an agency determines federal permission is necessary to implement a provision, it must request it and may delay that provision pending approval. History; Final law, sections 8–10.
What changed along the way?
The Senate committee substitute added the special documentation remedy, preserved the facts and proposed amount in the notice, added the description of review rights, and extended both challenge deadlines to 30 days. It also removed an introduced proposal to rewrite Human Resources Code 36.002’s civil-violation cross-reference; the existing broad reference to 32.039(b) remains. The substitute, engrossed, House committee and enrolled operative provisions match. No floor amendments are indexed. Introduced bill; Senate substitute; Text versions; Amendment index; Pre-act HR 36.002; Final law.
Related changes let a discretionary whistleblower award be based on recovery of the administrative remedy, rather than only the penalty, with the same 5% maximum. No award is allowed for activity already independently known to the commission or attorney general, and someone bringing a private action under chapter 36’s Subchapter C remains ineligible for this award. The criminal referral/inducement cross-references are renumbered, not expanded to make every new administrative violation that criminal offense. The bar on chapter 36 civil remedies and section 32.039 administrative remedies for the same act remains. Final law, sections 1, 5–6; Pre-act GV 544.0205; Pre-act HR 32.0391; Pre-act HR 36.006.
For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.
Official bill versions
Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.
Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?
Medicaid and its recipients may benefit from broader recovery and enforcement tools; providers, managed-care organizations and others face additional specified administrative exposure but have longer review-request deadlines. Existing provider-exclusion provisions also remain: generally 10 years for the specified injury cases and three years for other liability under subsection (c), with longer periods or exceptions under authorized rules. The act does not make every innocent billing error a knowing false claim or promise a recovery in every case. Referral exceptions, rule-recognized business practices, managed-care value-added services and conduct specifically authorized by law remain preserved within their statutory scope. Final law, section 4; Pre-act HR 32.039, subsections (u)–(x).
Recovered remedies cannot be claimed as allowable Medicaid expenses in a claim or rate-setting cost report. The March 10 and March 20 fiscal notes expect implementation work—including policy, procedure and contract updates—to fit existing resources and anticipate no significant state or local fiscal implication. But both expressly say additional administrative/civil recovery revenue is unknown, so that fiscal effect cannot be determined. They do not provide a dollar savings estimate or support a claim that the law pays for itself. Final law, amended 32.039(s); Introduced fiscal note; Substitute fiscal note.
Official sources
- Bill history and latest recorded action
- Bill versions, analyses and fiscal notes
- Action history and votes
- Amendment index
Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.