← Back to bills and search results
2025 · Regular session · Senate bill
SB1057
SB1057 lets qualifying corporations opt into higher requirements for shareholder proposals at shareholder meetings.
Official caption: Relating to the submission and approval of certain proposals by shareholders of nationally listed corporations.
Official report lists Senate author(s): Parker. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.
Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.
Bill highlights
Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.
- SB1057 lets qualifying corporations opt into higher requirements for shareholder proposals at shareholder meetings.
- The corporation must affirmatively opt in by amending its governing documents.
- Subject to the corporation’s governing documents and the exceptions below, a shareholder or shareholder group submitting a proposal must hold voting shares worth at least $1 million in market value or 3% of the corporation’s voting shares, measured when the proposal is submitted.
- The submitter must also solicit holders representing at least 67% of the voting power entitled to vote on the proposal.
- An opted-in corporation must include specific proposal-submission information in any proxy statement it provides, including how shareholders can contact one another to satisfy the ownership requirements as a group.
What does it do?
SB1057 lets qualifying corporations opt into higher requirements for shareholder proposals at shareholder meetings. It is not an automatic rule for every public company. The law adds section 21.373 to the Texas Business Organizations Code; chapter 21 defines “corporation” as a domestic for-profit corporation subject to that chapter. To qualify as “nationally listed” under this provision, the corporation must have equity securities registered under federal Securities Exchange Act section 12(b), be listed on a national securities exchange, and either have its principal office in Texas or be listed on an exchange whose principal office is in Texas and which has the Texas securities commissioner’s approval under the specified statute. Final law, subsection (a); BO 21.002; Federal exchange-registration provision, subsection (b); GV 4005.101; GV 4005.102; GV 4005.103.
The corporation must affirmatively opt in by amending its governing documents. It must notify shareholders of the proposed amendment in any proxy statement provided before adoption. Governing documents include the relevant formation and internal-governance documents; this act does not itself establish that any named company has opted in. Final law, subsections (b)–(c); BO 1.002, definition (36).
Subject to the corporation’s governing documents and the exceptions below, a shareholder or shareholder group submitting a proposal must hold voting shares worth at least $1 million in market value or 3% of the corporation’s voting shares, measured when the proposal is submitted. These are alternative ownership thresholds, not two requirements that must both be met. The shares must be held continuously for at least six months before the meeting and throughout the meeting. “Voting shares” means shares entitled to vote on that proposal. Final law, subsections (a)(2) and (e)(1)–(2).
The submitter must also solicit holders representing at least 67% of the voting power entitled to vote on the proposal. That is a solicitation requirement—not a requirement to win 67% support or a new general vote threshold for approval. Director nominations and procedural resolutions ancillary to conducting the meeting are exempt from these subsection (e) requirements. Final law, subsections (e)(3)–(f).
An opted-in corporation must include specific proposal-submission information in any proxy statement it provides, including how shareholders can contact one another to satisfy the ownership requirements as a group. Signed May 19, 2025, the act took effect September 1, 2025. Final law, subsection (d) and section 2; Official history.
What changed along the way?
The Senate committee substitute reorganized the introduced bill around a defined “nationally listed corporation,” expressly defined voting shares, and required notice of the proposed opt-in amendment in proxy materials preceding adoption. It removed the introduced bill’s separate clause declaring a vote on a nonqualifying proposal legally impermissible; the final law instead states the submission requirements and exceptions. The substitute also omitted a redundant express “formed under the laws of this state” phrase, but chapter 21’s definition of corporation remains relevant: that omission is not by itself a grant of authority over every out-of-state company. Introduced bill; Committee substitute; BO 21.002; Final law.
Senate floor amendment F1, offered by Johnson and incorporated into the engrossed bill, added the proxy-statement explanation of the submission process and how shareholders can contact others to meet the ownership requirement. The official history records the April 10 amendment and passage as amended. The engrossed, House committee and enrolled operative provisions match; no additional amendments are indexed. Amendment F1; Amendment index; Text versions; Disposition history; Final law.
For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.
Official bill versions
Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.
Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?
Qualifying corporations gain an optional way to screen meeting proposals for a substantial, sustained ownership stake and broad solicitation. Smaller holders may need to join a group to meet an ownership threshold, and proposers must bear the practical work of reaching holders of 67% of voting power. The contact-information requirement may help coordination, but does not guarantee a successful coalition or vote. These are implications of the statutory requirements, not measured effects on investment, corporate performance or proposal quality. Final law, subsections (b)–(f).
The March 17, March 27 and April 28 fiscal notes anticipate no significant state or local fiscal implication and assume implementation costs can fit existing resources. They do not quantify private shareholder solicitation costs or corporate savings. This explanation addresses the enacted Texas provision; it does not determine separate federal proxy-law obligations, a particular corporation’s governing-document procedures, or the outcome of a future legal challenge. Introduced fiscal note; Substitute fiscal note; Engrossed fiscal note; Final law.
Official sources
- Bill history and latest recorded action
- Bill versions, analyses and fiscal notes
- Action history and votes
- Amendment index
Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.