2025 · Regular session · Senate bill
SB1066
SB1066 adds an express bonding requirement for certain Texas Parks and Wildlife Department contracts worth more than $150,000.
Official caption: Relating to the requirement for performance and payment bonds from certain contractors of the Parks and Wildlife Department.
Official report lists Senate author(s): Perry. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.
Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.
Bill highlights
Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.
- SB1066 adds an express bonding requirement for certain Texas Parks and Wildlife Department contracts worth more than $150,000.
- The referenced contract authority concerns professional services related to department projects, including project management, design, bid and construction administration, consistent with the state’s professional-services procurement law.
- In ordinary public-work bonding law, a performance bond protects the government’s interest in faithful completion, while a payment bond protects qualifying labor and material providers.
- Signed May 15, 2025, the act took effect September 1, 2025.
What does it do?
SB1066 adds an express bonding requirement for certain Texas Parks and Wildlife Department contracts worth more than $150,000. For a contract under Parks and Wildlife Code 11.0171(a)(2) to construct, alter or repair a public building, or carry out or complete a public work, the department, executive director or director’s designee must require both a performance bond and a payment bond to the department before work begins. The new trigger is more than $150,000, not $150,000 or more. Final law, section 1.
The referenced contract authority concerns professional services related to department projects, including project management, design, bid and construction administration, consistent with the state’s professional-services procurement law. This is a specific department provision, not a rewrite of bonding requirements for every Texas public contract or every professional service. PW 11.0171, subsection (a)(2); GV 2254.002; GV 2254.003; GV 2254.004; Final law.
In ordinary public-work bonding law, a performance bond protects the government’s interest in faithful completion, while a payment bond protects qualifying labor and material providers. SB1066 requires both forms for the covered contracts. It does not expressly repeal Government Code chapter 2253 or state that contracts at or below $150,000 are exempt from every other bonding obligation. Accordingly, the new threshold should not be read as blanket permission to omit bonds on all smaller department contracts. GV 2253.021, subsections (a)–(c); Final law.
Signed May 15, 2025, the act took effect September 1, 2025. Its application turns on when the department first solicits bids, proposals, offers, qualifications or a similar response—not when the contract is signed or construction begins. Solicitations first made on or after September 1 are covered; earlier solicitations remain governed by the former law. Official history; Final law, sections 2–3.
What changed along the way?
The introduced bill separately stated the performance- and payment-bond requirements, each above $150,000, and referred to the Government Code definition of public-work contract. The Senate committee substitute combined them into one sentence, stated the construction/public-work scope directly, expressly named the department, executive director and designee as the responsible actors, and added “offers” to the transition language. The $150,000 threshold and before-work timing were retained. The substitute, engrossed, House committee and enrolled operative provisions match; no floor amendments are indexed. Introduced bill; Committee substitute; All versions; Amendment index; GV 2253.001, definition (4); Final law.
For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.
Official bill versions
Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.
Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?
The department must check for both bonds before covered work starts, and affected contractors must arrange them. The intended protection is financial backing for contract performance and payment obligations; a bond is not a guarantee that a project will never be delayed or that every claim will be paid. Any effect on contractor costs depends on the contract and bond terms, not simply the dollar threshold. Final law; GV 2253.021, subsections (b)–(c).
The February 28 and March 4 fiscal notes anticipate no significant state or local fiscal implication and assume implementation costs can be absorbed with existing resources. Neither supplies a dollar estimate of bond premiums, contractor savings or avoided losses. Those figures cannot be inferred from the notes. Introduced fiscal note; Substitute fiscal note.
Official sources
- Bill history and latest recorded action
- Bill versions, analyses and fiscal notes
- Action history and votes
- Amendment index
Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.