← Back to bills and search results
2025 · Regular session · Senate bill
SB1080
SB1080 expands opportunities to arrange an occupational license before leaving prison and changes when imprisonment requires a license to be revoked.
Official caption: Relating to the revocation of an occupational license from certain license holders and the issuance of an occupational license to certain applicants with criminal convictions.
Official report lists Senate author(s): West. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.
Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.
Bill highlights
Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.
- SB1080 expands opportunities to arrange an occupational license before leaving prison and changes when imprisonment requires a license to be revoked.
- Revocation: licensing authorities may still revoke a license because the holder is imprisoned after a felony conviction.
- Provisional licenses: the term increases from six to 12 months.
- Limits still matter: the section’s existing requirement to issue an ordinary or provisional license applies to otherwise qualified applicants and excludes the offense categories in section 53.021(a).
- Earlier issuance and information sharing: the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation may issue a license before a TDCJ inmate’s release if the inmate is enrolled in or has completed one of the specified educational programs.
What does it do?
SB1080 expands opportunities to arrange an occupational license before leaving prison and changes when imprisonment requires a license to be revoked. It became law without the governor’s signature and took effect May 27, 2025. It is not a guarantee that every person with a conviction can receive or keep every kind of license. Official history; Final law.
Revocation: licensing authorities may still revoke a license because the holder is imprisoned after a felony conviction. Revocation remains mandatory when that felony directly relates to the occupation, is among the offenses listed in Code of Criminal Procedure article 42A.054, or is a sexually violent offense as defined in article 62.001. Imprisonment following revocation of felony community supervision, parole or mandatory supervision also still requires revocation. The change makes revocation discretionary, rather than automatic, for other felony-imprisonment cases covered by these provisions. Final law, section 2; CR 42A.054; CR 62.001.
Provisional licenses: the term increases from six to 12 months. For an applicant imprisoned in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ), that term starts upon release, not while the applicant remains in prison. The law expressly includes inmates and certain parole or mandatory-supervision releasees living in halfway houses or community residential facilities who are enrolled in or have completed a Windham School District program or a program offered by an institution of higher education as defined by Education Code 61.003. The word “including” means those are not the only applicants with convictions whom the provisional-license provision covers. Final law, section 3; GV 508.118; GV 508.119; ED 61.003.
Limits still matter: the section’s existing requirement to issue an ordinary or provisional license applies to otherwise qualified applicants and excludes the offense categories in section 53.021(a). Section 53.0211 does not cover licenses allowing law-enforcement services, public health, education or safety services, or specified regulated financial services. Chapter 53 also has its own exclusions. Existing provisional-license rules still require revocation for a new offense, conduct causing supervision or parole revocation, or a violation of the occupation’s law or rules; absent those events, the ordinary license must issue when the provisional term expires. OC 53.0211, subsections (a), (d)–(g); OC 53.021, subsection (a); OC 53.002; Final law.
Earlier issuance and information sharing: the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation may issue a license before a TDCJ inmate’s release if the inmate is enrolled in or has completed one of the specified educational programs. This is an exception to that department’s former wait-until-release rule, not permission to skip eligibility checks. TDCJ must provide requested inmate information for a licensing authority’s eligibility determination. Licensing authorities requesting information about an inmate or releasee who has applied for a license are also added to the authorized recipients of confidential parole-related information; the law does not make those records generally public. Final law, sections 1, 3–4; OC 51.001; OC 51.4014; GV 508.313.
What changed along the way?
The introduced bill kept a six-month provisional term and delayed its start until an inmate’s release. The Senate committee substitute expanded the bill: it changed the term to 12 months, narrowed automatic revocation for felony imprisonment, added the education/prison and supervised-residence language, and added the TDCJ information-sharing provisions. Those provisions survived, subject to the floor changes below. Introduced bill; Senate substitute; Final law.
Both indexed floor amendments were adopted and survive in the enrolled law. Schwertner’s Senate amendment expressly preserved discretionary revocation for felony imprisonment and broadened the provisional-license wording to applicants with convictions “including” the specified inmate and releasee groups. Cook’s House amendment added the department-specific permission to issue a license before release to an inmate enrolled in or having completed a specified educational program. The engrossed and House committee texts match before Cook’s addition. Schwertner amendment; Cook amendment; Amendment dispositions; All text versions; Final law.
For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.
Official bill versions
Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.
Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?
Eligible applicants can prepare for licensed work before release and receive a longer provisional period afterward. Some existing license holders face a discretionary decision rather than automatic loss of their license, but the mandatory categories and other eligibility limits remain. Licensing authorities must evaluate applicants and administer the revised terms, while TDCJ must provide the specified information. The law does not promise a job, a particular income or automatic approval. Final law; OC 53.0211.
The fiscal notes for the introduced, substitute and House-passed versions anticipate no significant state or local fiscal implication and assume implementation costs can be absorbed with existing resources. The enrolled-version listing carries the May 9 House-passed note. None estimates an individual applicant’s earnings or a reduction in reoffending; the act itself makes no appropriation. March 31 note; April 2 note; House-passed note; Enrolled listing’s fiscal note; Final law.
Official sources
- Bill history and latest recorded action
- Bill versions, analyses and fiscal notes
- Action history and votes
- Amendment index
Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.