2025 Texas sessionsRegular and both called sessions have ended. This index covers House and Senate bills, not resolutions. Statuses come from official reports.

← Back to bills and search results

2025 · Regular session · Senate bill

SB11

SB11 lets a school district or an open-enrollment charter school not operated by or affiliated with a religious organization adopt a daily opportunity for students and employees to pray and read the Bible or another religious tex…

Read bill highlights ↓

Official caption: Relating to a period of prayer and reading of the Bible or other religious text in public schools.

Signed by governorSource-checked explanation published

Official report lists Senate author(s): Middleton, Bettencourt, Birdwell, Campbell, Creighton, et al.. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.

Report an error ↗

Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.

Bill highlights

Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.

Read the full explanation ↓

What does it do?

Optional prayer policy, required board vote

SB11 lets a school district or an open-enrollment charter school not operated by or affiliated with a religious organization adopt a daily opportunity for students and employees to pray and read the Bible or another religious text. Adoption requires a recorded board vote on the exact resolution specified in the law. If adopted, the policy must cover every campus. The law requires each district and open-enrollment charter governing board to take a recorded vote within six months after the act’s effective date; it does not require a yes vote. Final law, Education Code 25.0823(a)–(a-1) and Section 3.

The governor signed the bill June 20, 2025. It took effect September 1, 2025 and applies beginning with the 2025–26 school year. Its six-month voting deadline therefore falls on March 1, 2026. This explanation describes the statute, not whether any individual board met that deadline or adopted a policy. official history; Final law, Sections 3–5.

Participation requires consent—and a waiver

An employee, or a student’s parent or guardian, must submit a signed consent form before that person may participate. The form must acknowledge a choice whether to participate, state no objection to participating in or hearing the prayers/readings, and expressly waive claims under state or federal law arising from adoption of the policy, including Establishment Clause claims. The statutory waiver releases the district or school and its employees from those claims. Describing the required waiver is not a finding that every possible claim is legally waivable or that courts have upheld every application. Final law, Section 25.0823(b)(1).

Consent can be revoked by telling the appropriate school administrator. Participation then stops unless a new consent form is submitted. The statute says the waiver remains binding after consent is revoked; revoking participation does not, in the statute’s terms, undo the waiver already signed. That distinction matters to families and employees considering the form. Final law, Section 25.0823(c).

Rules protecting nonparticipants

The policy must prohibit broadcasting the prayer or reading over a public-address system and must not substitute it for instructional time. It must ensure the activity is not in the physical presence or hearing of someone who lacks consent or has revoked it, or conducted in another way that causes constitutionally recognized injury to that person. The law allows arrangements such as before-school periods, rooms where everyone has consented, an entire consenting campus, or another method recommended by the attorney general or the school’s legal counsel. These arrangements remain subject to the protections; the law does not require all students to attend a prayer period. Final law, Section 25.0823(b)(2)–(3) and (d).

On the governing board’s request, the attorney general must provide compliance advice, a model consent form and a defense against a lawsuit arising from adoption of the policy. If the attorney general represents the school, the state is responsible for expenses, costs, judgments or settlements arising from that representation, and the attorney general may settle. The act does not make the state liable for such claims against a school not represented by the attorney general. Final law, Section 25.0823(e)–(f).

The new section does not itself prohibit prayer or religious reading at other times, whether or not the school adopts this program. Separately, SB11 removes “encourage” from the existing prohibition against requiring, encouraging or coercing a student to engage in or refrain from individual, voluntary, silent prayer or meditation. It leaves the ban on requiring or coercing that activity and the protection for nondisruptive individual prayer in place. Removing one statutory word is not a blanket override of constitutional limits. Final law, Section 25.0823(g) and Section 2.

What changed along the way?

Versions and all three amendments

The introduced, Senate committee, engrossed, House committee and enrolled versions contain the same operative provisions; differences are headings, sponsorship and passage certifications. No floor amendment was adopted and no conference report was needed. All five posted texts; official history.

The House tabled all three proposals on May 22, 2025. Goodwin amendment 1 would have struck the enacting clause, preventing passage in that form. Zwiener amendment 2 would have shifted the program from school-provided opportunities toward student- or employee-organized activities, and barred students from joining employee-organized periods while allowing employees to join student-organized ones. That proposed restriction did not become law; the enacted safeguards are the consent and separation rules described above.

Turner amendment 3 would have removed the section deleting “encourage” from Education Code 25.901, preserving the older wording. Its page-and-line target is Section 2 on pages 4–5 of the House committee printing, not the separate six-month board-vote requirement. Because the amendment was tabled, the deletion remains in the final law. Official amendment dispositions; Final law.

For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.

Official bill versions

Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.

Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?

Benefits, burdens and uncertain costs

Families and employees seeking a scheduled religious period gain a local policy option covering prayer and the Bible or other religious texts. Nonparticipants receive statutory protections against being required to participate or placed within hearing of the activity. Boards must hold a recorded vote; schools adopting the policy must manage consent, revocations, space and schedules without replacing instruction. Participants must confront the statute’s continuing lawsuit waiver. These are features of the law, not evidence that it improves educational outcomes or resolves constitutional disputes. Final law.

The latest posted fiscal note, dated May 3, 2025 for the engrossed bill, says the state cost cannot be determined: it depends on how many schools adopt policies and seek attorney-general representation in resulting litigation. It says adopting schools bear the cost of providing prayer space, while the state covers the specified litigation costs when the attorney general represents them. The note gives no dollar total and should not be described as a zero-cost finding. May 3 fiscal note.

The March 3 introduced fiscal note uses the same cost assumptions. No separate enrolled fiscal posting appears in the official text index; the operative text did not change between the analyzed and final versions. The defense arrangement shifts potential lawsuit costs to the state only under the stated representation conditions, not for every school lawsuit. The act does not appropriate a fixed amount for the program. Final law, Section 25.0823(e)–(f).

Review scope: the complete final law, official history, all five text versions, all three amendment texts and dispositions, both fiscal postings, the amendment’s printed page references, and the prior version of Section 25.901 were checked. This is an enacted-law briefing, not a legal opinion on a particular consent waiver or an audit of local implementation or later litigation.

Official sources

Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.