← Back to bills and search results
2025 · Regular session · Senate bill
SB1169
SB1169 expands how public entities can work together through a public utility agency—a joint body formed by two or more public entities—to acquire, finance and operate water or sewer facilities.
Official caption: Relating to the provision of water or sewer service by public entities operating jointly or concurrently.
Official report lists Senate author(s): Hinojosa, Adam. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.
Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.
Bill highlights
Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.
- SB1169 expands how public entities can work together through a public utility agency—a joint body formed by two or more public entities—to acquire, finance and operate water or sewer facilities.
- The agency still may not impose a tax.
- Financing options include anticipation notes and financing or refinancing facilities.
- A participant may give an ordinance or resolution at least 180 days before a proposed withdrawal.
- Agency ratepayers gain an express appeal route to the Public Utility Commission (PUC).
- A new process lets the attorney general, at the PUC’s or Texas Commission on Environmental Quality’s request, seek appointment of a public utility agency as receiver for a utility or water supply/sewer service corporation meeting the specified abandonment or final-order/judgment-violation conditions.
What does it do?
SB1169 expands how public entities can work together through a public utility agency—a joint body formed by two or more public entities—to acquire, finance and operate water or sewer facilities. It adds water supply or sewer service corporations to the participating-public-entity definition, expressly includes acquisition among agency purposes and clarifies purchase, contract and financing powers. Participating entities may buy a qualifying utility, except an “affected county” as that term is defined in the Water Code. An agency is expressly a retail public utility, but remains excluded from the narrower statutory “utility” definition; those labels are not interchangeable. Final law, sections 1–4, 6 and 12; Water Code definitions.
The agency still may not impose a tax. It generally has no eminent-domain power, except the existing section 572.0585 provision for agencies domiciled in a county with more than 1.2 million people. That exception has its own service-area and purpose limits and does not allow condemnation to acquire underground-water rights or water or water rights. The agency restriction is distinct from participating entities’ existing acquisition powers. Final law, sections 2, 4 and 7; Existing condemnation exception; Participating-entity powers.
Financing options include anticipation notes and financing or refinancing facilities. The agency may pledge facility revenues, contracted participant revenues, assessments imposed by a public entity and provided by contract, or other agency funds. Operation and maintenance expenses retain first claim on pledged revenues. Using an existing facility itself as collateral for a new facility requires approval by resolution from each public entity participating in that joint financing; using facility revenue as security is expressly excepted from this approval rule. The act also allows a joint water-infrastructure funding mechanism with the North American Development Bank and transfers facility/management liability to the agency upon its ownership of the facilities. Final law, sections 3 and 9–10.
A participant may give an ordinance or resolution at least 180 days before a proposed withdrawal. If its revenues secure agency obligations, it cannot use that withdrawal route without the agency’s approving resolution. On withdrawal it takes the outstanding debt attributable to its proportional benefit and, without compensation from the agency, loses further agency rights, duties, obligations and service access. Withdrawal is not a way to walk away from the allocated debt. Final law, section 5.
Agency ratepayers gain an express appeal route to the Public Utility Commission (PUC). A petition under this route must be filed with both the PUC and service provider within 90 days after the rate change takes effect and signed by the lesser of 10,000 or 10 percent of eligible ratepayers whose rates changed. The agency board must notify each eligible ratepayer within 60 days after the final rate decision, stating the effective date, new rates and where to find more information; electronic notice is allowed if an email address is available. These are different decision-date and effective-date clocks. On appeal the PUC must respect the act’s revenue-sufficiency protection for operating costs, debts, reserves and related obligations. An appeal does not guarantee a lower bill. Final law, sections 8 and 13; Existing cost and debt requirements; Rate-appeal framework.
A new process lets the attorney general, at the PUC’s or Texas Commission on Environmental Quality’s request, seek appointment of a public utility agency as receiver for a utility or water supply/sewer service corporation meeting the specified abandonment or final-order/judgment-violation conditions. A receiver manages the business under court authority; this is not an unrestricted right to seize a neighboring system. The PUC must prioritize the agency receiver’s acquisition application under Water Code 13.412(g) and issue approval within 120 days after finding the application complete. A separate temporary-management route requires notice and an opportunity to be heard and one of the listed discontinued-service, receivership-referral or final-order-violation conditions. Final law, section 11; Receivership procedure; Temporary-management procedure.
The PUC may adopt a rule allowing an agency with a water supply or sewer service corporation participant to provide retail service without a certificate of public convenience and necessity—the usual service-area authorization. The act grants rulemaking discretion, not an automatic certificate exemption for every agency. Signed May 20, 2025, it took effect immediately. Final law, sections 14–15; Prior certificate requirements; Official history.
What changed along the way?
The Senate substitute removed the introduced bill’s broad proposed grant of county, municipal and district powers, including a proposed agency power to issue assessment-backed bonds under chapter 372. It instead added the express no-eminent-domain rule with the existing narrow exception. The final financing list retains assessments imposed by a public entity and passed to the agency by contract, not the removed wording authorizing the agency itself to impose them under chapter 372. The substitute also added the receivership and temporary-management subchapter. These are committee-substitute changes, not floor amendments. Introduced text; Senate substitute; Final law.
The substitute, engrossed, House committee and enrolled operative provisions match; no floor amendments are indexed. Many agency powers already existed, including joint creation, contracts, revenue obligations and a tax prohibition. The act expands and qualifies that framework rather than creating all joint utility authority from scratch. All versions; Amendment index; Prior creation statute; Prior powers; Prior obligations statute; Final law.
For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.
Official bill versions
Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.
Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?
Participating systems gain more tools for combined investment and for maintaining service when a system fails or violates the specified orders. Ratepayers gain an express notice-and-appeal route, while financing protections, withdrawal debt and takeover responsibilities can affect their providers’ costs. The act does not promise cheaper rates, award a particular project funding, forgive debts or establish that any specific system qualifies for takeover. Final law.
The April 11 and April 16 fiscal notes anticipate no significant state fiscal impact and assume existing resources can absorb state costs. They identify possible local effects, and the substitute note specifically identifies responsibilities for an agency appointed receiver or temporary manager. Its statement about agencies imposing assessments should not override the substitute’s deletion of the proposed direct chapter 372 assessment authority: the enacted text controls. Neither note supplies a quantified final local cost or savings estimate. Introduced fiscal note; Substitute fiscal note; Final law.
Official sources
- Bill history and latest recorded action
- Bill versions, analyses and fiscal notes
- Action history and votes
- Amendment index
Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.