← Back to bills and search results
2025 · Regular session · Senate bill
SB1171
SB1171 changes pay, injury leave and fitness requirements for specified Texas Juvenile Justice Department employees, particularly the Office of Inspector General’s commissioned peace officers.
Official caption: Relating to compensation, leave, and physical fitness programs and standards for certain employees of the office of inspector general of the Texas Juvenile Justice Department.
Official report lists Senate author(s): Perry. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.
Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.
Bill highlights
Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.
- SB1171 changes pay, injury leave and fitness requirements for specified Texas Juvenile Justice Department employees, particularly the Office of Inspector General’s commissioned peace officers.
- The act makes hazardous-duty pay mandatory for the office’s investigators, inspector general, security officers and apprehension specialists.
- Commissioned Office of Inspector General officers are added to the existing injury-leave law.
- Adding the department to the fitness-program statute requires programs and standards for its commissioned officers.
- Signed June 20, 2025, the act took effect September 1, 2025.
What does it do?
SB1171 changes pay, injury leave and fitness requirements for specified Texas Juvenile Justice Department employees, particularly the Office of Inspector General’s commissioned peace officers. It requires those commissioned officers to be paid under Schedule C, the state budget’s designated salary schedule, and directs the state auditor’s classification officer to classify their positions accordingly beginning with the biennium starting September 1, 2025. It does not set a single dollar salary or raise for every employee. Final law, sections 4–5; Office and commissioning authority.
The act makes hazardous-duty pay mandatory for the office’s investigators, inspector general, security officers and apprehension specialists. Prior law already permitted that pay; the change is from “may” to “shall” for those roles. The separate discretionary provision for employees with routine direct youth contact and at least 12 months of lifetime service credit remains. These are different eligibility descriptions; not every department employee is placed on Schedule C. Final law, section 2; Prior hazardous-duty provision.
Commissioned Office of Inspector General officers are added to the existing injury-leave law. It provides salary-preserving leave without using compensatory time or other chapter 661 leave for qualifying duty-related injuries, but excludes injuries to which the officer’s gross negligence contributed and injuries related to routine office duties. Medical examination evidence and a Texas-licensed physician’s recommended leave period are required; the maximum for injuries occurring at one time is one year. Workers’ compensation medical benefits may coexist with this leave, but disability retirement benefits may not be paid during the leave period. The extension applies only to injuries occurring on or after September 1, 2025, not earlier injuries. Final law, sections 3 and 6; Injury-leave conditions.
Adding the department to the fitness-program statute requires programs and standards for its commissioned officers. Existing law ties standards to job duties and individual age- and gender-specific fitness goals, requires consultant assistance and a reward policy offering up to four days of administrative leave per year, and permits individual exemptions, including for line-of-duty injuries. A standards violation can be just cause for discharge or the specified transfer; the law does not require automatic dismissal or guarantee four extra days to every officer. Final law, section 1; Fitness-law definitions; Fitness requirements and exceptions.
Signed June 20, 2025, the act took effect September 1, 2025. The temporary classification-direction section expires September 1, 2027; that is not an expiration of the separate permanent Schedule C compensation requirement added to Human Resources Code 242.102(j). Official history; Final law, sections 4–7.
What changed along the way?
The Senate committee substitute made drafting and list-placement changes without changing the substantive pay, leave, fitness or timing provisions: it moved the department’s name within the agency list and cleaned up wording and deletion markings. The substitute, engrossed, House committee and enrolled operative text match. No floor amendments are indexed. The final act therefore retains the introduced policy package rather than adding a later floor compromise. Introduced text; Senate substitute; All versions; Amendment index; Final law.
For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.
Official bill versions
Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.
Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?
Covered officers gain the Schedule C pay framework and access to the specified injury protection, while designated inspector-general-office roles gain mandatory hazardous-duty pay. The department must administer those benefits and the fitness framework. These changes may support recruitment or retention, but the act does not establish that staffing or performance will improve. Fitness participation and standards also bring obligations, with the existing individual-exemption process. Final law; Fitness statute.
All three fiscal notes estimate $499,593 in annual general-revenue cost for fiscal 2026–2030, or $999,186 over the 2026–2027 biennium. The estimate concerns reclassifying 54 existing full-time-equivalent officer positions—not hiring 54 additional officers—and comprises $389,030 a year in salary increases and $110,563 in state-paid benefits. The bill itself makes no appropriation. No local-government fiscal impact is anticipated. Introduced fiscal note; Substitute fiscal note; Engrossed fiscal note.
The criminal-justice impact statement reports no express new felony, felony-punishment increase or change to felony supervision, parole or mandatory-supervision eligibility, and anticipates no significant correctional-population or resource effect. It is not a measured prediction of improved juvenile safety or investigative results. Criminal-justice impact statement.
Official sources
- Bill history and latest recorded action
- Bill versions, analyses and fiscal notes
- Action history and votes
- Amendment index
Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.