← Back to bills and search results
2025 · Regular session · Senate bill
SB12
SB12 expands parental access, consent and complaint procedures in public education while restricting defined diversity, equity and inclusion duties, assistance with social transitioning, certain instruction and certain student cl…
Official caption: Relating to parental rights in public education, to certain public school requirements and prohibitions regarding instruction, diversity, equity, and inclusion duties, and social transitioning, and to student clubs at public schools.
Official report lists Senate author(s): Creighton. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.
Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.
Bill highlights
Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.
- SB12 expands parental access, consent and complaint procedures in public education while restricting defined diversity, equity and inclusion duties, assistance with social transitioning, certain instruction and certain student clubs.
- A later court order matters: in GSA Network v.
- The act protects specified parental education, moral/religious-training and treatment decisions against government infringement unless necessary for a compelling state interest and narrowly tailored using the least restrictive means.
- District engagement policies must offer an online comment portal, put public comments at the start of board meetings and hold meetings outside typical work hours.
- Health-related changes and monitoring generally trigger parental information duties.
- Written, signed parental consent is required for the covered psychological or psychiatric examinations, tests and treatment, specified health-information disclosures and biometric-data actions unless other law authorizes them, and health services, medication and medical procedures.
What does it do?
What SB12 enacted—and an important court limit
SB12 expands parental access, consent and complaint procedures in public education while restricting defined diversity, equity and inclusion duties, assistance with social transitioning, certain instruction and certain student clubs. It also adds school reporting and transparency requirements. Signed June 20, 2025, it took effect September 1, 2025 and applies beginning with the 2025–26 school year. The provisions below describe the enacted text; their coverage differs between school districts and charter schools. official history; Final law.
A later court order matters: in GSA Network v. Morath, the February 20, 2026 injunction (court-filed copy) barred Houston, Katy and Plano ISDs and the specified associated persons from implementing or enforcing the act’s DEI, social-transition, sexual-orientation/gender-identity instruction and student-club provisions during that litigation. It did not block the whole act statewide or require schools to abandon preexisting facility-access procedures. The accompanying court opinion dismissed the commissioner for lack of standing and granted the preliminary relief as unopposed by the districts. These docket-stamped primary documents are hosted by CourtListener, not the court’s website. This is a dated account of that order, not certification of every subsequent order or any district’s current compliance.
Parental information and consent
The act protects specified parental education, moral/religious-training and treatment decisions against government infringement unless necessary for a compelling state interest and narrowly tailored using the least restrictive means. It expressly recognizes choosing public, private or home schooling. Districts must provide information on parental rights at enrollment and annually, with a state-developed form prominently posted online. Parents gain express access to their child’s library checkout records; districts must post semester instructional plans or syllabi and supply them to parents. Districts and open-enrollment charters must post a homepage notice about parents’ right to review teaching materials. Final law, Sections 1 and 11–15.
District engagement policies must offer an online comment portal, put public comments at the start of board meetings and hold meetings outside typical work hours. District policies must provide at least two opportunities for in-person parent-teacher conferences each school year. A parent must receive notice within one school business day after an employee first suspects a criminal offense against the child, subject to the existing child-abuse provision. The law preserves compliance with other laws, including federal student-records privacy law, rather than declaring every nondisclosure unlawful. Final law, Sections 11, 15–16 and 25–26.
Health-related changes and monitoring generally trigger parental information duties. But disclosure is not required under the specified notification/access provisions when a reasonably prudent person would believe it likely to cause abuse or neglect. Child-abuse reporting and investigations remain protected. Schools may ask about a child’s daily or general well-being without first obtaining parental consent; the act does not turn every ordinary conversation into a consent-required examination. Annual health-service notices must explain the right to decline services. Final law, Sections 17–18.
Written, signed parental consent is required for the covered psychological or psychiatric examinations, tests and treatment, specified health-information disclosures and biometric-data actions unless other law authorizes them, and health services, medication and medical procedures. Definitions reach certain surveys, screenings and methods embedded in lessons, not merely activities labeled “tests.” Existing exceptions for child-abuse/special-education requirements and specified video or voice recordings remain. Routine care by authorized providers may use consent obtained at enrollment or the school year’s start, generally lasting through that year unless the parent provides otherwise. Consent records must be retained. Final law, Section 18.
Before a pre-K–12 well-being questionnaire or health screening, parents must receive a copy and give the required consent. Human-sexuality instruction also requires written consent; the request must arrive at least 14 days before instruction and cannot be bundled with other requests except the related statutory notice. Certain state counseling and professional standards had to be reviewed and revised as needed by June 30, 2026; that temporary review provision expires September 1, 2027. Final law, Sections 17 and 23.
Restrictions on school duties, instruction and clubs
The DEI restriction covers defined hiring influences, race-based differential treatment or benefits, specified programs referencing race, ethnicity, gender identity or sexual orientation, and solicited or favored DEI statements. It is not simply a ban on mentioning race. Exceptions and safeguards preserve required legal compliance, specified historically Black college recruitment collaborations, lawful minority/women-owned business contracting, state-standard classroom instruction, data collection, commemorations, student speech, and steps against unlawful discrimination addressing achievement gaps. Districts must prohibit employees, contractors and volunteers from performing the covered duties; employee/contractor discipline for knowing or intentional violations must include due process and an appeal opportunity. The DEI provisions also apply to open-enrollment charters. Final law, Sections 3 and 8.
Districts must adopt policies barring employees from assisting enrolled students with “social transitioning,” defined in the act by reference to a move from sex at birth to the opposite sex through names, pronouns or other gender expressions. The text includes providing information or guidelines intended to assist that transition. Boards must investigate reported suspected violations and report confirmed violations to the commissioner; parents may use the district grievance process. The final act does not retain the House amendment’s express extension of this provision to open-enrollment charters. Final law, Section 7 and the final Section 12.104 amendments.
Districts, open-enrollment charters and their employees may not provide—or allow a third party to provide—pre-K–12 instruction, guidance, activities or programming regarding sexual orientation or gender identity. The provision preserves protected nondisruptive student expression, authorized health services subject to required consent, and meetings of single-sex organizations whose mission does not advance a political or social agenda. Separately, the enacted club rule bars school authorization or sponsorship of clubs based on sexual orientation or gender identity and requires written parental consent for participation in authorized or sponsored clubs. These are among the four provisions covered by the limited injunction described above. Final law, Sections 21, 24 and 27.
Districts and charters must adopt discipline policies for knowing or intentional violations of the existing instructional restrictions in Section 28.0022; SB12 does not create all those older curriculum rules anew. Superintendents must certify compliance with the specified DEI/instructional provisions to TEA by September 30 annually, after public board approval with at least seven days’ posted notice and an opportunity for public testimony. Certifications must describe policies, changes and any resulting savings, and TEA must publish them. Final law, Sections 22 and 28.
A new grievance process and other accountability rules
Districts must provide staged complaint review, from the appropriate campus or central-office administrator through the superintendent and board. A board may delegate to a committee of at least three trustees. Policies must prohibit retaliation, require conflicted reviewers to step aside, retain reasons and evidence, allow added documents/claims, route misfiled complaints correctly and decide the merits despite procedural errors. Board hearings must be recorded, with at least five business days’ notice of information outside the record on which the board intends to rely. Parents generally may request open or closed hearings unless other law requires otherwise. Final law, Sections 19–20.
Parents must have at least 60 days from knowing the facts to file; after informal resolution efforts, the minimum is the later of 90 days from that knowledge or 30 days after the district explains how to file. Appeals get at least 20 days. Non-board hearings must occur within 10 days of filing, with a decision within 20 days after the hearing. Board meetings must occur within 60 days of the previous decision, followed by a decision within 30 days. Districts must publish procedures/forms and accept electronic filing, report grievances annually, and face required superintendent testimony if the commissioner finds against them in at least five qualifying grievances in a school year. TEA’s statewide grievance report is due each December 1. Final law, Chapter 26A.
Other provisions require annual facility/land capacity and usage reporting, with security-risk information withheld from the public report; annual trustee information and updates within 30 days of a new trustee’s swearing-in; and compliance with mandatory school policies. The act preserves the federal special-education fee rules and excludes local grievances from its frivolous-proceeding fee provision. It prevents innovation-plan exemptions from the specified health-education rules, including existing plans, and reinforces the teacher-certification parent-notice requirement subject to its existing federal-notice exception. Final law, Sections 1–2, 4–6, 9–10 and 29.
What changed along the way?
Versions, amendments and the final compromise
The five posted versions show major committee changes followed by a conference agreement adopted by both chambers May 31. The Senate versions proposed a broader interdistrict-transfer system, including restrictions on denials and transfer tuition. The House removed that design; it is not part of final SB12. The House also replaced the Senate’s special hearing-examiner approach with the new Chapter 26A grievance process. The full conference report in the May 30 Senate journal matches the enrolled operative text. official history.
All three Senate amendments were adopted and their central changes survive: Creighton F1 excludes local grievances from the frivolous-proceeding fee provision; Hughes F2 adds charter-school health advisory councils and health-education compliance; Hughes F3 prevents innovation-plan exemptions from Section 28.004, including plans adopted or renewed before the act.
The House adopted Leach amendment 1, a large revision. Its historically Black college recruitment exception, employee due-process protection, lawful minority/women-owned contracting safeguard, narrowed retaliation sanction and club-consent requirement survive. But its definition narrowing “classroom instruction,” its targeted employee-recruitment exception and its narrower sexual-orientation/gender-identity instruction language do not survive the conference. The final instruction provision again covers guidance, activities and programming, and the final club section includes the ban absent from Leach’s club language. An adopted amendment is not necessarily the final law.
Four House proposals failed: Jessica González amendment 2 adding a separate student-rights section; Josey Garcia amendment 3 protecting targeted recruitment/retention for Black, male and other underrepresented educators; Bowers amendment 4 exempting programs teaching historical/current discrimination; and Manuel amendment 5 exempting certain professional health/safety assessment duties. Existing final exceptions must be read on their own terms, not replaced by those rejected proposals.
The adopted Money amendment 6 removes references to the district’s literacy/math and college-readiness plans from the achievement-gap safeguard, leaving the Section 39.053 reference. Toth and others’ amendment 7, adding broader social-transition notices and changing Family Code abuse/neglect definitions, was withdrawn; those Family Code changes are not in SB12. Dutton amendment 8, allowing certain school-climate/safety surveys after two unanswered consent requests, failed; silence did not become consent under that proposal.
The adopted Schatzline and others’ amendment 9 deletes an express savings clause for child-consented counseling under Family Code 32.004. The House printing, page 23 establishes that target. Deleting this clause is not an express repeal of Family Code 32.004 itself; SB12 leaves the general well-being and child-abuse-reporting safeguards described above.
Schoolcraft amendment 10 proposed banning sexual-orientation/gender-identity clubs but was withdrawn; Turner amendment 11 to add anti-vaccination clubs to that proposal failed. The conference independently restored the sexual-orientation/gender-identity club ban, without the anti-vaccination addition. Toth amendment 12 adding the social-transition policy was adopted; the final compromise retains the district policy but not its express charter-school extension. All 15 amendment dispositions.
The conference also removed the proposed withholding of state bond guarantees for retaliation and omitted the House’s express grievance extension to charters and innovation-plan restriction on grievance exemptions. It retained educator-referral consequences for retaliation and restored superintendent testimony after five adverse commissioner findings. The final text, not an earlier House or Senate summary, governs these distinctions. full conference report in the May 30 Senate journal; Final law.
For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.
Official bill versions
Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.
Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?
Benefits, burdens and costs
Parents gain clearer access, notice, consent and complaint routes. Families concerned about classroom content or school health services gain more control over specified decisions. Schools and teachers face additional records, posting, hearing and consent work; restrictions can reduce available programming and support for students, particularly those seeking the clubs or transition-related assistance addressed in the act. Student-speech, anti-discrimination, health-service and abuse-reporting exceptions are material limits, not optional details. The later injunction shows that implementation is contested; it does not establish measured academic benefits or costs. Final law; accompanying court opinion.
The May 30 conference/final fiscal note estimates a $1,481,790 General Revenue cost over FY2026–27: $475,808 in FY2026 and $1,005,982 in FY2027. It projects $195,856 annually for FY2028–30 and two additional full-time-equivalent TEA positions compared with FY2025. Its rounded technology estimates are about $300,000 in FY2026 and $800,000 in FY2027, included in—not added on top of—the total. The act itself makes no appropriation.
Local costs for facility reporting, policies, website notices, records, materials and investigations could not be determined. The introduced note’s “no significant” estimate and the Senate versions’ approximately $1.28 million estimate were superseded. The Senate notes also discussed transfer-tuition losses under a proposal removed before enactment; those losses should not be presented as a cost imposed by final SB12. The House, House-passed and conference financial tables use the approximately $1.48 million total. Introduced note; Senate substitute note; final note.
Review scope: complete final law, official history, five versions and full conference text, all 15 amendment texts/dispositions, seven fiscal postings, relevant prior statutes and the cited court orders. The court material supports the dated and limited litigation account above, not a claim that all later litigation or every school policy has been audited.
Official sources
- Bill history and latest recorded action
- Bill versions, analyses and fiscal notes
- Action history and votes
- Amendment index
Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.