2025 Texas sessionsRegular and both called sessions have ended. This index covers House and Senate bills, not resolutions. Statuses come from official reports.

← Back to bills and search results

2025 · Regular session · Senate bill

SB1214

SB1214 updates election, administration, contracting and borrowing rules for the Concho County Hospital District.

Read bill highlights ↓

Official caption: Relating to the operations and administration of the Concho County Hospital District.

Signed by governorSource-checked explanation published

Official report lists Senate author(s): Perry. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.

Report an error ↗

Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.

Bill highlights

Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.

Read the full explanation ↓

What does it do?

SB1214 updates election, administration, contracting and borrowing rules for the Concho County Hospital District. It was signed May 29, 2025, and took effect September 1, 2025. Although the bill allowed immediate effect with a two-thirds vote in each chamber, the House’s 88–30 vote did not meet that condition. Final law, section 10 and certification; Official history.

Board elections: Candidates now file an application under Election Code Chapter 144 with the board secretary instead of the district’s special petition signed by at least 10 registered taxpaying voters. Directors must still be district residents and qualified voters, but no longer must own land. District employees are expressly barred from serving as directors. Deleting the separate “at least 18” phrase does not permit children to serve: the retained qualified-voter requirement includes age 18. Final law, sections 1–2; Qualified-voter definition; Application requirement; Filing deadlines.

The application change applies to elections ordered on or after September 1. New director qualifications apply to people elected or appointed on or after that date; existing directors may finish their current terms, and may be reelected or reappointed if they meet the new requirements. The board must elect a vice president as well as a president and secretary. Final law, sections 3 and 9.

Administration: The act repeals the district-specific $1,000 director-bond requirement and associated bank safekeeping rule for bonds and oaths, and the administrator-bond requirement of at least $5,000. It removes this section’s express assistant-administrator appointment provision and related references. The district administrator still serves at the board’s will with board-set compensation. Repealing these particular provisions is not a general exemption from other applicable oath, employment or accountability laws. Final law, sections 4–5 and 8; Repealed director-bond provision; Former administrator provisions.

Contracts and debt: The act replaces the district’s special advertising rule for construction or purchase contracts over $2,000 with express construction-contract authority, authority to use Government Code Chapter 2269 for public works, and application of Chapter 2253 performance/payment-bond rules. This is not permission to disregard applicable public-contracting law. It changes the revenue-limit wording from “obligation” to “debt” and adds the public-hospital borrowing statute as an exception. That statute permits loans backed by eligible hospital revenue or tax revenue, with repayment deadlines of up to five years for hospital-revenue-backed loans and one year for tax-backed loans. It does not authorize unlimited borrowing. Final law, sections 6–7; Public-works framework; Contract bond requirements; Hospital borrowing limits.

What changed along the way?

The changes replace district-specific petition, landownership, officer, bonding and contract provisions and add a defined hospital-loan exception to the existing revenue restriction. The prior equipment-finance and other statutory exceptions remain; the bill does not itself approve a particular loan or construction project. Former petition rule; Former qualifications; Former $2,000 contract rule; Prior revenue restriction; Final law.

The introduced, Senate committee, Senate-passed, House committee and enrolled texts have the same substantive sections. Both committees reported without amendments, and the official amendment index lists no amendments. There is no separate floor proposal to describe as enacted. Five text versions; Amendment index.

For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.

Official bill versions

Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.

Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?

Residents who do not own land gain eligibility to serve, while district employees are excluded from new election or appointment to the board. The district gains updated administrative and financing tools, and contractors must work within the applicable public-works and bonding framework. Removing individual bond requirements may reduce compliance expense but also removes those specific financial safeguards. No particular savings, new hospital service or construction outcome is guaranteed. Final law.

The April 4 fiscal note anticipates no state fiscal impact and no significant local fiscal impact. It gives no dollar estimate for district savings, borrowing costs or contractor effects. The act makes no new appropriation. Fiscal note.

Official sources

Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.