2025 Texas sessionsRegular and both called sessions have ended. This index covers House and Senate bills, not resolutions. Statuses come from official reports.

← Back to bills and search results

2025 · Regular session · Senate bill

SB1229

SB1229 names a defined stretch of U.S.

Read bill highlights ↓

Official caption: Relating to the designation of a portion of U.S. Highway 69 in Smith County as the Veterans Memorial Highway.

Signed by governorSource-checked explanation published

Official report lists Senate author(s): Hughes. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.

Report an error ↗

Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.

Bill highlights

Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.

Read the full explanation ↓

What does it do?

SB1229 names a defined stretch of U.S. Highway 69 in Smith County the Veterans Memorial Highway. It runs from the intersection with South State Loop 323 to the intersection with the northern municipal limits of Bullard. The name is in addition to any other designation, not a renumbering of U.S. 69 or a designation of the entire highway. Signed May 21, 2025, the act took effect September 1, 2025. Final law; Official history.

TxDOT must design and construct memorial markers and place them at both ends and appropriate intermediate sites, subject to the existing funding condition: a grant or donation must cover design, construction and erection before the department may do that work. The general law also assigns TxDOT marker repair/replacement and grounds maintenance. The act does not prove that funds have been received or signs installed. Final law, section 1; Existing marker-funding and maintenance rule.

What changed along the way?

The bill adds the memorial designation and marker direction to the Transportation Code. It also instructs that the added provision be renumbered if needed to avoid duplicate section numbers. That drafting instruction does not change the road’s physical route or create a highway-widening project. Final law, sections 1–2.

All five versions—introduced, Senate committee, Senate-passed, House committee and enrolled—contain the same substantive provisions. Both committees reported without amendments, and the official amendment index lists no amendments. No proposed route change was substituted for the enacted endpoints. Text versions; Amendment index.

For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.

Official bill versions

Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.

Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?

The designation provides public recognition of veterans along this Smith County corridor. The practical work is commemorative signage, conditional on outside funding for initial design, construction and installation; it is not a new veterans-benefit payment or road-capacity program. No traffic, tourism or economic gain is quantified in the act. Final law; Existing marker-funding and maintenance rule.

The March 20 fiscal note anticipates no significant state fiscal impact, assuming costs can be absorbed with existing resources, and no local-government fiscal impact. This estimate does not remove the statutory grant/donation condition. The act makes no new appropriation. Fiscal note.

Official sources

Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.