← Back to bills and search results
2025 · Regular session · Senate bill
SB1243
SB1243 gives participating public entities an express way to dissolve a joint public utility agency and transfer its obligations, assets, permits and licenses to the remaining public entities.
Official caption: Relating to the dissolution of a public utility agency.
Official report lists Senate author(s): Birdwell. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.
Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.
Bill highlights
Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.
- SB1243 gives participating public entities an express way to dissolve a joint public utility agency and transfer its obligations, assets, permits and licenses to the remaining public entities.
- This concerns the joint water and sewer agencies governed by Local Government Code chapter 572, not every organization called a utility.
What does it do?
SB1243 gives participating public entities an express way to dissolve a joint public utility agency and transfer its obligations, assets, permits and licenses to the remaining public entities. The participants may act through concurrent ordinances. If only one participant remains, it may dissolve the agency by its own ordinance using the same transfer provision. The law authorizes this process; it does not itself dissolve a named agency. Signed June 20, 2025, it took effect September 1, 2025. Final law; Official history.
This concerns the joint water and sewer agencies governed by Local Government Code chapter 572, not every organization called a utility. The chapter defines the participating public entities to include counties, municipalities, qualifying districts or authorities, and water supply or sewer service corporations. A concurrent ordinance means an ordinance or resolution adopted under this framework by two or more public entities. Chapter definitions; Agency and ordinance definitions; Agency formation; Water and sewage powers.
What changed along the way?
The existing section already allowed participants to add or remove a participating public entity by concurrent ordinances. SB1243 retains that authority and adds the dissolution-and-transfer option, including the one-remaining-participant provision. The introduced, Senate committee, Senate-passed, House committee and enrolled substantive texts match; both committees reported without amendments, and the official index lists no amendments. Prior section; Five text versions; Amendment index; Final law.
Dissolution is distinct from one participant withdrawing. Another 2025 act, SB1169, added a withdrawal process with 180-day advance notice, agency approval where participant revenues secure agency obligations, and an allocation of outstanding debt. The official compiled section displays that provision alongside SB1243’s dissolution provision, both labeled subsection (b) with their separate enactment sources. SB1243 should not be read here as a promise that withdrawal restrictions or debts disappear. SB1169, section 5; Compiled section with both enactments.
For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.
Official bill versions
Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.
Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?
Participating entities gain a clearer statutory route to end the joint agency while moving its assets and responsibilities to the remaining entities. The requirement to transfer all obligations, along with assets, permits and licenses, is not debt forgiveness. The chapter’s defined obligations include bonds or notes backed by fees, charges, assessments or other available agency revenue. Actual effects on service, staffing, rates or administrative costs depend on the particular arrangement; the act does not promise lower water bills or measured savings. Final law; Obligation definition; Existing financing provisions.
The March 28 fiscal note anticipates no state fiscal implication and no significant local-government fiscal implication. It gives no quantified savings estimate. The bill does not appropriate money for a dissolution or transfer. Fiscal note; Final law.
Official sources
- Bill history and latest recorded action
- Bill versions, analyses and fiscal notes
- Action history and votes
- Amendment index
Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.