← Back to bills and search results
2025 · Regular session · Senate bill
SB1268
SB1268 aligns reviews of specified water- and flood-planning rules with Texas’s five-year planning cycles instead of the general four-year rule-review timetable.
Official caption: Relating to the review and updating by the Texas Water Development Board of guidance principles and rules related to certain plans adopted or approved by the board.
Official report lists Senate author(s): Blanco. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.
Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.
Bill highlights
Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.
- SB1268 aligns reviews of specified water- and flood-planning rules with Texas’s five-year planning cycles instead of the general four-year rule-review timetable.
- The act covers four planning areas: the state water plan, regional water plans, the state flood plan and regional flood plans.
What does it do?
SB1268 aligns reviews of specified water- and flood-planning rules with Texas’s five-year planning cycles instead of the general four-year rule-review timetable. Signed May 19, 2025, it took effect September 1, 2025. It changes when the Texas Water Development Board reviews rules; it does not itself approve a water project, fund a flood barrier or rewrite every agency rule. Final law; Official history.
The act covers four planning areas: the state water plan, regional water plans, the state flood plan and regional flood plans. Rules in the specified provisions must be reviewed and updated as necessary and at least every five years, aligned with the relevant plan cycle. The five-year schedule does not require waiting when an earlier update is necessary. Final law, sections 1–4.
What changed along the way?
Before this act, the state water and flood guidance principles already had five-year review language, while Government Code section 2001.039(b) generally required agency-rule review by the fourth anniversary and every four years afterward. SB1268 expressly brings other state-plan rules into the five-year review language, adds five-year review duties for the regional-planning rules, and exempts these covered rules from the named four-year timing requirement. It does not abolish review or grant an exemption from every provision of the Administrative Procedure Act. Final law; Prior water-plan guidance; Prior flood-plan guidance; General rule-review statute.
The existing named-agency input for state water and flood planning remains. The act changes none of the regional plan provisions requiring public meetings and comments; its timing exception is specifically directed at section 2001.039(b). This is a timing exception, not a repeal of public-participation requirements. Final law, sections 1–4; Regional water-plan procedures; Regional flood-plan procedures.
All five substantive versions—introduced, Senate committee, Senate-passed, House committee and enrolled—match. Both committees reported without amendments, and the official amendment index lists none. The five-year alignment and limited four-year exemption were retained from the original proposal. Five versions; Amendment index.
For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.
Official bill versions
Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.
Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?
The board and regional planners can coordinate rule reviews with plan preparation rather than separate four- and five-year schedules. A scheduled review may occur less often than under the general rule, but necessary updates remain required. The law does not establish how much work will be saved or show that a particular water or flood risk has been addressed. Final law.
The March 16 fiscal note anticipates no significant state or local-government fiscal impact, assuming implementation can use existing resources. It gives no quantified savings and the act makes no appropriation. Fiscal note.
Official sources
- Bill history and latest recorded action
- Bill versions, analyses and fiscal notes
- Action history and votes
- Amendment index
Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.