2025 Texas sessionsRegular and both called sessions have ended. This index covers House and Senate bills, not resolutions. Statuses come from official reports.

← Back to bills and search results

2025 · Regular session · Senate bill

SB1318

SB1318 limits noncompete agreements for physicians, dentists, licensed professional or vocational nurses, and physician assistants.

Read bill highlights ↓

Official caption: Relating to restrictions on covenants not to compete for physicians and certain health care practitioners.

Signed by governorSource-checked explanation published

Official report lists Senate author(s): Schwertner. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.

Report an error ↗

Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.

Bill highlights

Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.

Read the full explanation ↓

What does it do?

SB1318 limits noncompete agreements for physicians, dentists, licensed professional or vocational nurses, and physician assistants. It does not ban every noncompete. For covered agreements, the law imposes a maximum buyout, a one-year duration limit, a five-mile geographic limit and a clear-written-terms requirement. The governor signed it June 20, 2025; it took effect September 1, 2025, but its changes apply only to covenants entered into or renewed on or after that date. Earlier covenants remain governed by the prior law. Final law, sections 1–5; Official history.

A covered covenant must offer a buyout by the clinician of no more than the clinician’s total annual salary and wages at termination; expire no later than one year after the contract or employment ends; extend no more than a five-mile radius from the location where the clinician primarily practiced before termination; and state its terms clearly and conspicuously in writing. The cap is not a requirement that every clinician pay a full year’s wages, nor a promise that an employer pays that amount. The dentist/nurse/physician-assistant provisions apply to covenants relating to those respective practices, not every role held by someone with a health-care license. Final law, sections 15.50(b) and 15.501.

For physicians, a practice-of-medicine covenant is void and unenforceable if the physician is involuntarily discharged without good cause. “Good cause” means a reasonable basis directly related to the physician’s conduct, including conduct on or off the job, job performance and contract or employment record. The act does not extend that particular discharge protection to dentists, nurses or physician assistants. It is separate from their shared buyout, time, distance and writing limits. Final law, section 15.50(d).

What changed along the way?

Physicians retain protections for access to a list of patients seen or treated in the year before termination, access to patient-authorized records and copies for permitted reasonable fees, and continued care during a patient’s acute illness. A different record format cannot be demanded absent mutual agreement. The law replaces the prior physician buyout standard of a reasonable price or arbitration-determined amount with the annual-salary-and-wages ceiling. It does not copy all these physician-specific patient-access provisions into the new dentist/nurse/physician-assistant section. Prior physician noncompete law; Medical-record fee provision; Final law.

For the physician requirements in subsection (b), “practice of medicine” excludes managing or directing medical services in an administrative capacity for a medical practice or other health-care provider. The existing subsection (c) exclusion from subsection (b) for a physician’s ownership interest in a licensed hospital or ambulatory surgical center also remains. These limits should not be described as a blanket exemption from every noncompete law. Final law, section 15.50(b-1); Retained ownership-interest provision.

The underlying requirement that a covenant be part of an otherwise enforceable agreement and reasonably limited in time, geography and restrained activity remains. A one-year/five-mile covenant is therefore not automatically enforceable merely because it meets the new numerical ceilings. The act also adds the practitioner section to the statute’s exclusive enforceability framework and revises its preemption wording; existing court procedures and remedies remain in section 15.51. This is not a determination that a state statute overrides applicable federal law. Final law, sections 15.50(a), 15.52; Existing enforcement procedures and remedies.

The introduced and Senate committee texts match. Schwertner’s adopted Senate amendment supplied the primary-practice-location reference for the radius and an administrative-role exclusion. Bonnen’s adopted House amendment added the clear-writing requirement and physician discharge-without-good-cause protection, expanded the administrative wording to other health-care providers, limited practitioner covenants to their respective practices, and corrected the radius reference to the practitioner’s own primary location. It replaced the earlier “as specified in the covenant” wording. Those House changes survive; the Senate concurred May 28. Introduced bill; Senate committee text; Senate amendment; Senate-passed text; House committee text; House amendment; Text versions; Both indexed amendments.

For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.

Official bill versions

Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.

Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?

Covered clinicians gain limits on how long and how far a noncompete can restrict practice, and on the price of buying out the covenant. Patients may benefit from physician continuity protections. Employers and practices lose some contractual flexibility and may need to revise new or renewed agreements. The act does not measure wage gains, hiring changes or patient access, and an individual dispute still depends on the agreement, role, renewal date and termination circumstances. Final law.

The March 24 introduced, May 14 Senate-passed and May 23 post-House fiscal notes anticipate no state or local-government fiscal implication, assuming any state costs can be absorbed within existing resources. The enrolled fiscal link repeats the May 23 note. These notes do not quantify private buyout changes, litigation costs or employer losses, and the act makes no appropriation. Introduced fiscal note; Senate-passed fiscal note; Post-House fiscal note; Enrolled fiscal link.

Official sources

Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.