← Back to bills and search results
2025 · Regular session · Senate bill
SB1376
SB1376 allows a code enforcement officer in training to work without supervision if the employer does not also employ a registered code enforcement officer.
Official caption: Relating to the supervision requirements of a code enforcement officer in training.
Official report lists Senate author(s): Hughes. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.
Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.
Bill highlights
Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.
Read the full explanation ↓What does it do?
SB1376 allows a code enforcement officer in training to work without supervision if the employer does not also employ a registered code enforcement officer. Otherwise, the statutory supervision rule remains. The governor signed it June 20, 2025, and it took effect that day because the legislative votes met the immediate-effect threshold. Final law; Official history.
What changed along the way?
Code enforcement includes inspecting premises for hazards such as unsafe buildings, fire or health hazards and nuisance violations. Before SB1376, section 1952.103(c) provided for trainees to work under a registered officer’s supervision without this express employer-based exception. The new exception turns on whether the employer also employs a registered officer—not simply whether a supervisor is absent for the day. It is permission to work unsupervised in that circumstance, not a requirement that the employer abandon supervision. Code-enforcement definition; Prior trainee rule; Final law.
The act does not waive trainee registration, examination, fees or other applicable qualifications. The existing trainee provision covers applicants with less than one year of full-time code-enforcement experience who satisfy its examination and other requirements, and the trainee certificate expires on its first anniversary. SB1376 amends the supervision subsection, not those eligibility and expiration provisions. Trainee eligibility and certificate term; Final law.
HB4765 also amended this section in the same session. The official statutory text as of December 31, 2025 combines the wording and retains SB1376’s no-registered-employee exception. It would be incorrect to read HB4765’s supervision wording alone as silently removing this exception. Related HB4765 final law; Combined statutory text; Final law.
All five versions of SB1376 have the same operative two sections, and the official index lists no amendments. The employer-based exception was present at introduction and survived unchanged. Introduced; Senate committee; Senate-passed; House committee; Final law; Version index; Amendment index.
For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.
Official bill versions
Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.
Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?
Employers without a registered officer gain staffing flexibility, and qualifying trainees may carry out code-enforcement work without that supervision. Residents may consequently encounter trainees working independently in the covered circumstances. The law does not quantify staffing savings or determine whether inspection quality will improve or decline. Final law.
The March 17 fiscal note anticipates no significant state or local fiscal impact and assumes state costs can be absorbed using existing resources. It does not estimate individual employers’ savings or trainees’ costs. The act makes no appropriation. Fiscal note; Final law.
Official sources
- Bill history and latest recorded action
- Bill versions, analyses and fiscal notes
- Action history and votes
- Amendment index
Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.