← Back to bills and search results
2025 · Regular session · Senate bill
SB1404
SB1404 updates electronic notice in family cases and requires legal-fee judgments to be separate from judgments confirming unpaid support.
Official caption: Relating to requirements for certain orders and judgments rendered in a suit affecting the parent-child relationship.
Official report lists Senate author(s): West. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.
Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.
Bill highlights
Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.
Read the full explanation ↓What does it do?
SB1404 updates electronic notice in family cases and requires legal-fee judgments to be separate from judgments confirming unpaid support. A person whose information is protected by a court nondisclosure order generally must provide an email address for the final order, but not when the court finds that doing so would likely endanger that person’s safety. Signed June 20, 2025, the law took effect September 1, 2025, and applies to parent-child suits already pending in a trial court on that date as well as later-filed suits. Final law; Official history.
What changed along the way?
The email address is for later motions, petitions and other pleadings through the state’s electronic filing system, and other legal documents or required notices. Court clerks may use that system to send orders, notices and other documents relating to the covered final order to an email address provided by a party. The safety exception means the court may not require the protected party to provide an address under the new provision if it finds likely danger; the law does not simply remove all nondisclosure protection. Final law, section 1; Existing final-order and nondisclosure rules.
The existing last-known-address notice rule is extended from child-support enforcement to modification actions too. It remains discretionary for the court, requires a showing of diligent efforts to locate the party, and excludes actions seeking contempt. It concerns written notice delivered to the latest residence, email or employment address filed by that party with the court and state case registry; it is not blanket permission to use any old email address. Final law, section 1.
When awarding attorney fees or expenses under section 106.002, the court must make that judgment separate from a judgment confirming support arrears. The same separation applies to attorney fees and court costs awarded under section 157.167(a) after a failure to pay child support. This changes the judgments’ separation, not an automatic forgiveness of fees, costs or unpaid support. It does not repeal the existing enforcement rules for those awards. Final law, sections 2–3; General fee awards; Support-enforcement fee awards; Arrears judgments.
The Senate substitute added the safety exception. The introduced version required an email address from the protected party without that new exception. The substitute’s protection survived unchanged in the Senate-passed, House committee and enrolled substantive text. No floor amendments are listed. Introduced; Senate substitute; Senate-passed; House committee; Final law; Version index; Amendment index.
For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.
Official bill versions
Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.
Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?
Courts and families gain an electronic route for later documents and clearer separation of legal fees from support balances. Protected parties retain the new safety exception, while recipients still need to pay attention to case notices. The act does not establish a particular family’s savings, guarantee actual receipt of email, or change the amount of support owed. Final law.
The March 20 substitute fiscal note anticipates no significant fiscal impact on the state or local governments and assumes implementation costs can be absorbed within existing resources. The March 18 introduced note says the same. These estimates do not mean no work is required or quantify individual legal bills; the act makes no appropriation. Substitute fiscal note; Introduced fiscal note.
Official sources
- Bill history and latest recorded action
- Bill versions, analyses and fiscal notes
- Action history and votes
- Amendment index
Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.