2025 Texas sessionsRegular and both called sessions have ended. This index covers House and Senate bills, not resolutions. Statuses come from official reports.

← Back to bills

2025 · Regular session · Senate bill

SB1422

SB1422 names the FM 852 bridge crossing Lake Gilmer in Upshur County the Petty Officer Billy Machen Memorial Bridge.

Read bill highlights ↓

Official caption: Relating to the designation of a portion of Farm-to-Market Road 852 in Upshur County as the Petty Officer Billy Machen Memorial Bridge.

Signed by governorSource-checked explanation published

Official report lists Senate author(s): Hughes. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.

Report an error ↗

Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.

Bill highlights

Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.

Read the full explanation ↓

What does it do?

SB1422 names the FM 852 bridge crossing Lake Gilmer in Upshur County the Petty Officer Billy Machen Memorial Bridge. This is an additional designation, not a renaming of every part of FM 852. Signed May 27, 2025, it took effect September 1, 2025. Final law; Official history.

What changed along the way?

The Texas Department of Transportation must arrange markers bearing the designation and other appropriate information at each end of the bridge, subject to the existing funding condition. Under that rule, the department may not design, construct or erect the markers until a grant or donation covers those costs. The act also requests code renumbering to avoid duplicate section numbers. It does not authorize a new bridge or road expansion. Final law; Marker funding and maintenance rules.

The introduced, Senate committee, Senate-passed and House committee versions used “Petty Officer Billy Machen Bridge.” The sole indexed floor amendment, offered by Representative Hefner and adopted May 7, added “Memorial” in three places. Those additions appear in the enrolled law, and the Senate concurred in the House change. Adopted amendment; Amendment index; Introduced; Senate committee; Senate-passed; House committee; Final law; Version index.

For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.

Official bill versions

Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.

Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?

The law provides a local commemorative designation. Donated or granted funds must cover initial marker design, construction and installation; the general law assigns marker repair, replacement and grounds maintenance to the department and allows donations for maintenance. This review does not establish that money has been donated or that signs are already installed. Final law; General marker rules.

The May 8 fiscal note for the House-passed bill anticipates no significant state fiscal impact, assumes costs can be absorbed within existing resources, and anticipates no local-government fiscal impact. The introduced note reaches the same conclusion. Neither gives an installation price or makes an appropriation. House-passed fiscal note; Introduced fiscal note.

Official sources

Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.