← Back to bills and search results
2025 · Regular session · Senate bill
SB1433
SB1433 authorizes the attorney general to assert legislative privilege for the state, a state agency or a state official in covered constitutional challenges to Texas statutes.
Official caption: Relating to the assertion of legislative privilege by the attorney general in certain legal challenges to the constitutionality of state statutes.
Official report lists Senate author(s): Bettencourt. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.
Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.
Bill highlights
Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.
Read the full explanation ↓What does it do?
SB1433 authorizes the attorney general to assert legislative privilege for the state, a state agency or a state official in covered constitutional challenges to Texas statutes. Legislative privilege is a claim of protection for legislative work in litigation. The act addresses who may assert it and how to show authority to do so; it does not declare that every privilege claim succeeds. Signed June 20, 2025, it took effect September 1, 2025. Final law; Official history.
What changed along the way?
The new authority applies during discovery—the exchange of evidence—as well as hearings or trial in an action covered by Government Code 402.010. That section concerns a pleading challenging the constitutionality of a Texas statute, not every case involving a government party. The attorney general may not use the new authority when asserting the privilege would create a conflict in representing the state, agency or official. Final law; Existing constitutional-challenge framework.
The attorney general has 30 days after asserting the privilege to provide evidence of representing the state, agency or official who may properly assert it. Timely evidence establishes the attorney general’s authority to assert the privilege under the new provision; that is different from proving that particular evidence is privileged. The authority is not exclusive and does not impair another person’s ability to assert legislative privilege in any matter. Final law, subsections (e)–(g).
The introduced, Senate committee, Senate-passed, House committee and enrolled operative texts are unchanged. No floor amendments are listed. The bill adds these three subsections rather than rewriting the section’s existing notice provisions. Introduced; Senate committee; Senate-passed; House committee; Final law; Version index; Amendment index.
For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.
Official bill versions
Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.
Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?
The state’s lawyers gain an express statutory route to assert the privilege, subject to the conflict and representation requirements. Parties seeking legislative evidence may encounter that assertion, but the act does not establish a particular case’s outcome or automatically shield every document or witness. It does not create an exclusive power for the attorney general or eliminate other people’s ability to assert the privilege. Final law.
The March 11 fiscal note anticipates no significant fiscal impact on the state or local governments and assumes implementation costs can be absorbed within existing resources. It does not estimate changes in private litigation costs or the success rate of privilege claims. The act makes no appropriation. Fiscal note.
Official sources
- Bill history and latest recorded action
- Bill versions, analyses and fiscal notes
- Action history and votes
- Amendment index
Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.