2025 Texas sessionsRegular and both called sessions have ended. This index covers House and Senate bills, not resolutions. Statuses come from official reports.

← Back to bills

2025 · Regular session · Senate bill

SB1804

SB1804 helps victims remove tattoos imposed through force, fraud or coercion connected to trafficking or prostitution-related offenses.

Read bill highlights ↓

Official caption: Relating to restitution and compensation paid to victims of certain offenses for tattoo removal related to the offense.

Signed by governorSource-checked explanation published

Official report lists Senate author(s): Alvarado. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.

Report an error ↗

Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.

Bill highlights

Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.

Read the full explanation ↓

What does it do?

SB1804 helps victims remove tattoos imposed through force, fraud or coercion connected to trafficking or prostitution-related offenses. It expands court-ordered restitution and creates a separate crime-victim compensation benefit of up to $3,000 for qualifying trafficking victims’ tattoo removal. Signed June 20, 2025; effective September 1, 2025, with an offense-date limitation. Final law; Official history.

What changed along the way?

Restitution paid by a convicted defendant: courts must order defendants convicted under Penal Code Chapter 20A, concerning trafficking, or Chapter 43, Subchapter A, concerning prostitution-related offenses, to pay the cost of necessary rehabilitation, including medical, psychiatric and psychological care, plus removal of a tattoo the victim received through force, fraud or coercion related to the offense. The bill removes the former under-18 victim restriction and broadens the covered offenses beyond the previously named trafficking and compelling-prostitution provisions. The rehabilitation expansion matters even where no tattoo is involved. Final law, sections 1–2; Prior restitution law.

A separate state compensation route: trafficking victims may receive up to $3,000 for removal of a tattoo received through force, fraud or coercion related to the offense. The bill adds this expense to the compensation law’s definition of financial loss. The $3,000 ceiling belongs to this state benefit, not to the restitution obligation above. It is not an automatic $3,000 payment, and the tattoo-removal benefit does not extend to every prostitution-related victim merely because the restitution provision is broader. General compensation-application requirements remain; the attorney general determines whether grounds for compensation exist. Final law, sections 3–4; Compensation approval framework.

Which offenses qualify under the new law: the changes apply only to offenses committed on or after September 1, 2025. If any element of the offense occurred before that date, the old law controls. A later application, conviction or tattoo-removal appointment does not by itself bring an older offense under these changes. Final law, sections 5–6.

Passage and amendments: the introduced, Senate committee, Senate-passed, House committee and enrolled versions have the same operative provisions. The official amendment index lists no amendments, and both committees reported the bill without amendments. There was no broader proposal removed during passage to treat as enacted law. Introduced; Senate committee; Senate-passed; House committee; Final law; Version index; Amendment index.

For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.

Official bill versions

Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.

Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?

Qualifying survivors gain a specifically recognized way to recover tattoo-removal costs, and adult victims gain the expanded mandatory rehabilitation-restitution protection. A court order does not guarantee prompt collection: the unchanged law requires the court to consider the defendant’s finances when specifying payment arrangements and allows civil-judgment-style enforcement. State compensation remains a separate eligibility decision. The act does not require victims to remove tattoos. Final law; Restitution payment and enforcement provisions.

The April 7 fiscal note anticipates no significant state or local-government fiscal impact and assumes implementation costs can be absorbed with existing resources. It does not estimate how many victims will qualify, the average removal cost or how much restitution defendants will actually pay. The bill makes no appropriation. Official fiscal note.

Official sources

Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.