← Back to bills and search results
2025 · Regular session · Senate bill
SB1858
SB1858 expressly includes independent school districts in the definition used by the state’s bulletproof-vest and body-armor grant program.
Official caption: Relating to eligibility for the bulletproof vest and body armor grant program.
Official report lists Senate author(s): Hagenbuch. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.
Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.
Bill highlights
Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.
Read the full explanation ↓What does it do?
SB1858 expressly includes independent school districts in the definition used by the state’s bulletproof-vest and body-armor grant program. The definition covers state and political-subdivision agencies authorized by law to employ peace officers. It is not an automatic equipment grant for every school employee. Signed June 20, 2025; effective September 1, 2025. Final law; Official history.
What changed along the way?
The change: Government Code Section 772.0075 now defines “law enforcement agency” to include an agency of the state or a political subdivision authorized to employ peace officers, expressly including an independent school district. The existing program provides financial assistance to equip peace officers with bulletproof vests, ballistic plates and plate carriers. The bill changes the definition; it does not create the program from scratch or authorize a new category of armed employees. Final law; Existing grant-program law.
Existing conditions remain: an applicant agency must first adopt a policy on allocation, deployment and use of the vests or plates. Purchased vests or plates must meet a National Institute of Justice rifle-protection standard. Recipients must provide purchase evidence, item prices and quantities as soon as practicable, and the administering criminal justice division reports annually to the Legislative Budget Board. Eligibility does not guarantee an award or a particular amount. Program requirements, subsections (b)–(g); Final law.
Passage: the five published versions have identical operative provisions, both committees reported the bill without amendments, and the official amendment index lists none. Introduced; Senate committee; Senate-passed; House committee; Final law; Version index; Amendment index.
For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.
Official bill versions
Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.
Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?
Independent school districts authorized to employ peace officers gain explicit inclusion in the program’s agency definition, and their officers may benefit from funded protective equipment. Applicants still face policy, purchase and reporting requirements. The act supplies no new guaranteed allocation and does not establish that a particular district received equipment or that any equipment eliminates injury risk. Final law; Existing program.
The April 28 fiscal note anticipates no significant state or local-government fiscal implication, including no significant impact identified by the Governor’s Office. It does not estimate an award per district or officer. The act makes no appropriation; the existing program may use revenue available for its purposes. Official fiscal note; Final law; Existing funding authority.
Official sources
- Bill history and latest recorded action
- Bill versions, analyses and fiscal notes
- Action history and votes
- Amendment index
Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.