2025 · Regular session · Senate bill
SB2004
SB2004 adds the INDYCAR Grand Prix of Arlington to Texas’s Major Events Reimbursement Program and temporarily allows it to qualify without competing against an out-of-state location.
Official caption: Relating to the eligibility of the INDYCAR Grand Prix of Arlington for funding under the major events reimbursement program.
Official report lists Senate author(s): King. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.
Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.
Bill highlights
Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.
Read the full explanation ↓What does it do?
SB2004 adds the INDYCAR Grand Prix of Arlington to Texas’s Major Events Reimbursement Program and temporarily allows it to qualify without competing against an out-of-state location. It also lists Penske Entertainment as a site-selection organization. This is eligibility for public event-cost reimbursement—not a guaranteed award or proof that the race pays for itself. Signed May 27, 2025; effective September 1, 2025. Final law; Official history.
What changed along the way?
Event-specific exception: new Government Code 478.0051(d) says, “Notwithstanding Subsection (b),” the Arlington event may receive funding when a site-selection organization selects a Texas site as the sole site without considering out-of-state sites through a highly competitive process. The provision expires September 1, 2030. That sunset applies to this special subsection—not to the separate addition of the event and Penske Entertainment to the statutory lists. The exception is for this named race, not every INDYCAR event. Final law, Sections 1–2; Earlier eligibility rules.
How reimbursement works: the existing program requires a local-government request and site-selection documentation, estimates event-related increases in specified state/local tax receipts, and uses a trust fund supported by retained/remitted local revenues and a state contribution capped by the estimated state tax increase. Local money can substitute for specified local tax deposits. Disbursements depend on approved event-support obligations and program rules; the money can be disbursed without a separate appropriation under the existing statute. SB2004 creates no new tax rate or fixed-dollar award. Request prerequisites; Tax-increase calculation; Local tax deposits; Alternative local contribution; State contribution and cap; Disbursement authority; Contract obligations and approval; Final law.
The separate provisions governing allowable event costs, limits on certain long-lived improvements, possible reductions when actual attendance is significantly below estimates, and public economic-impact reporting are not rewritten by this act. The law does not guarantee every cost is reimbursable. Because the special eligibility subsection expressly overrides Subsection (b), it should not be summarized as merely inserting the race’s name while leaving that subsection’s ordinary competitive-selection test unchanged. Allowable costs; Improvement limitations; Attendance adjustment; Impact-study and disclosure rules; Final law.
Amendment history: the introduced bill added the event and Penske Entertainment to the lists. The Senate committee substitute added the special noncompetitive-selection provision without a sunset. King’s sole indexed floor amendment, adopted April 29, added the September 1, 2030 expiration. The Senate-passed, House committee and enrolled operative texts match. Thus the expiration is enacted, not merely proposed. Introduced; Senate substitute; King amendment; Senate-passed; House committee; Final law; Version index; Amendment index.
For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.
Official bill versions
Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.
Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?
Event organizers and participating local governments gain a potential source of reimbursement; nearby businesses could benefit from event activity. Those are possibilities, not measured net economic gains. Public tax receipts/local contributions support reimbursements, and other event or infrastructure costs may remain with the parties responsible for them. No particular application, approved award, payment, actual attendance or economic return is verified here. Final law; Disbursement conditions; No state guarantee of event obligations.
The April 4 and April 15 fiscal notes anticipate no significant state or local-government fiscal implication, assuming associated costs can be absorbed with existing resources. They do not price an Arlington award or demonstrate that reimbursement uses no public money. SB2004 specifies eligibility; the existing revenue and disbursement framework determines any payment. Introduced fiscal note; Substitute fiscal note; Final law.
Official sources
- Bill history and latest recorded action
- Bill versions, analyses and fiscal notes
- Action history and votes
- Amendment index
Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.