2025 Texas sessionsRegular and both called sessions have ended. This index covers House and Senate bills, not resolutions. Statuses come from official reports.

← Back to bills and search results

2025 · Regular session · Senate bill

SB2032

SB2032 gives the state and its community-based foster-care contractors more time to prepare for an early contract ending, while allowing a replacement contract without the usual competitive procurement process.

Read bill highlights ↓

Official caption: Relating to certain requirements regarding a contract between a single source continuum contractor and the Department of Family and Protective Services.

Signed by governorSource-checked explanation published

Official report lists Senate author(s): Paxton. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.

Report an error ↗

Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.

Bill highlights

Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.

Read the full explanation ↓

What does it do?

SB2032 gives the state and its community-based foster-care contractors more time to prepare for an early contract ending, while allowing a replacement contract without the usual competitive procurement process. The required advance notice becomes 180 days for either side. Signed May 19, 2025; effective September 1, 2025, with a contract-specific transition rule. Final law; Official history.

What changed along the way?

A single source continuum contractor—the contractor providing foster-care services in a community-based-care area—must give the department and commission at least 180 days’ notice before ending its contract early, up from 60 days. The Department of Family and Protective Services must likewise give the contractor at least 180 days’ notice, up from 30 days. These are advance-notice periods, not deadlines requiring every contract to end after 180 days. Final law, section 1; Prior notice requirements.

Previously, the replacement-contract provision expressly applied when the contractor gave early-termination notice. It now also applies when DFPS gives notice of its intent to terminate. DFPS may contract with a different contractor for the sole purpose of assuming the contract being terminated. For that replacement, the act permits bypassing competitive bidding, advertising and proposal evaluation requirements, notwithstanding other law, including the four listed procurement statutes. It is not a blanket permission to skip competition for every DFPS purchase. The trigger is notice, so DFPS need not wait for termination to take effect before using this authority. Final law, section 2; Prior replacement and contingency-plan law.

The procurement exception concerns the specified bidding, advertising and evaluation steps. The act does not repeal the existing contingency-plan and contractor transfer-plan duties in Family Code 264.166(a)–(b), or announce an exemption from all child-safety and contract-accountability obligations. Existing DFPS contracting law separately addresses measurable outcomes, sanctions, accounting, auditing and performance monitoring. Final law; Continuity and transfer plans; Contract accountability provisions.

The new rules apply to a contract entered into, amended, modified, renewed or extended on or after September 1, 2025. Contracts falling under the earlier-law provision remain governed by that law; the act does not automatically rewrite every untouched existing contract on its effective date. Final law, sections 3–4.

No floor amendments are listed. Comparing all five versions shows no substantive policy change: the Senate committee text corrected “on after” to “on or after” in the transition sentence, and that corrected text remained through enrollment. The Senate passed it 31–0 and the House 146–0, with one present but not voting. Introduced; Senate committee; Senate-passed; House committee; Final law; Amendment index; Version index.

For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.

Official bill versions

Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.

Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?

Children, families and service providers may benefit from a longer period to plan a contractor handoff and a faster way to appoint a replacement. The tradeoff is a longer required exit notice for both sides and less competition and advance advertising for qualifying replacement contracts. Those changes do not prove that a particular transition will be smooth or that the selected replacement will cost less or perform better. No actual contractor departure, replacement award or child outcome is established here. Final law; Existing community-based-care goals.

The April 13 fiscal note anticipates no significant state fiscal impact, assuming DFPS can absorb costs within existing resources, and no local-government fiscal impact. That is a budget estimate, not a guarantee of zero transition costs or savings. The act makes no appropriation. Although the note describes contracting “following the termination,” the enacted text expressly permits action when either side gives termination notice. Fiscal note; Final law.

Official sources

Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.