2025 · Regular session · Senate bill
SB21
SB21 creates the Texas Strategic Bitcoin Reserve as a special fund outside the state treasury, managed by the comptroller.
Official caption: Relating to the establishment and administration of the Texas Strategic Bitcoin Reserve for the purpose of investing in cryptocurrency and the investment authority of the comptroller of public accounts over the reserve and certain other state funds.
Official report lists Senate author(s): Schwertner. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.
Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.
Bill highlights
Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.
- SB21 creates the Texas Strategic Bitcoin Reserve as a special fund outside the state treasury, managed by the comptroller.
- Cryptocurrency purchased with reserve money must have an average market capitalization of at least $500 billion over the most recent 24 months.
- The reserve includes appropriated/dedicated money, qualifying purchased or received cryptocurrency, specified assets arising from blockchain splits or broad distributions to existing holders, and investment earnings, interest or rewards.
- The comptroller may contract for management and custody, including secure storage that keeps private keys offline.
- A five-member advisory committee comprises the comptroller, one member of the comptroller’s investment advisory board and three cryptocurrency-investment experts.
- By December 31 of each even-numbered year, the comptroller must publish and submit to the legislature a report covering holdings and estimated value at the end of the preceding state fiscal biennium, changes disaggregated by cryptocurrency type, and management actions.
What does it do?
A state cryptocurrency reserve—not a $500 billion appropriation
SB21 creates the Texas Strategic Bitcoin Reserve as a special fund outside the state treasury, managed by the comptroller. It allows legislative appropriations and revenues dedicated by other laws to support cryptocurrency investments and reserve administration; it does not itself appropriate a dollar amount. Signed June 20, 2025, it took effect that day after receiving the required legislative votes. Official history; final law, Sections 1–2 and 5.
Cryptocurrency purchased with reserve money must have an average market capitalization of at least $500 billion over the most recent 24 months. That measures the cryptocurrency’s overall market size—not the state’s purchase amount, a minimum reserve balance or a guarantee of safety. The rule is not a blanket authorization to buy any cryptocurrency. final law, Section 403.704.
The reserve includes appropriated/dedicated money, qualifying purchased or received cryptocurrency, specified assets arising from blockchain splits or broad distributions to existing holders, and investment earnings, interest or rewards. The comptroller must use reasonable care, skill and caution under a prudent-investor standard that considers the whole reserve. Cash may be invested with the state treasury pool. Reasonable management costs may be paid with cryptocurrency or net sale proceeds. final law, Sections 403.701–.703.
Custody, oversight and cash management
The comptroller may contract for management and custody, including secure storage that keeps private keys offline. A qualified liquidity provider must be licensed or regulated, have audited financial statements, at least five years of digital-asset trading experience, a Texas office and registered principal, and the required certification. Derivatives—financial contracts whose value depends on an underlying asset or benchmark—may be used if the comptroller determines they serve the reserve’s best interest. Hiring a CPA for an independent audit is authorized, not required by this provision. final law, Section 403.705.
A five-member advisory committee comprises the comptroller, one member of the comptroller’s investment advisory board and three cryptocurrency-investment experts. The four appointed members serve at the comptroller’s will. Members receive no compensation or expense reimbursement for committee service. The committee advises on valuation and prudent investment policies; it does not replace the comptroller as manager. final law, Section 403.707.
By December 31 of each even-numbered year, the comptroller must publish and submit to the legislature a report covering holdings and estimated value at the end of the preceding state fiscal biennium, changes disaggregated by cryptocurrency type, and management actions. The law directs necessary implementing rules and committee appointments as soon as possible. final law, Section 403.708 and act Section 4.
Ordinary transfers back to the treasury require legislative authorization. For necessary statutory cash-management purposes, however, the comptroller may liquidate reserve assets and temporarily transfer the money. The money and any interest earned while in the treasury must be returned as soon as practicable. This is not a requirement to retain every bitcoin indefinitely. final law, Sections 403.703(f) and .706.
Beyond the reserve, SB21 broadens an exception in the Public Funds Investment Act: the relevant investment subchapter does not apply to state funds invested by the comptroller, replacing the narrower reference to investments authorized by Government Code 404.024. It does not repeal every other investment restriction for all state or local bodies. final law, Section 3.
What changed along the way?
What changed before enactment
The introduced bill allowed voluntary cryptocurrency gifts and donations. The Senate committee substitute removed that mechanism and related donation language; the engrossed Senate version retained that approach. The House committee substitute restored a donation mechanism limited to Texas-domiciled donors, with donor-recognition options, and added qualified-liquidity-provider requirements and express authority for derivatives, staking and lending reserve assets. Five posted versions; final law.
The sole indexed floor amendment, Linda Garcia’s House amendment 1, changed the $500 billion average-market-capitalization lookback from 12 months to 24 months. It was adopted May 20 and survives in the final act. Official amendment index.
The final conference agreement retained the 24-month test, liquidity-provider requirements and derivatives authority, but removed the House’s donation mechanism and its express staking and lending provisions. Those deleted proposals must not be advertised as powers newly granted by final SB21. The May 27 Senate journal conference report matches the enrolled operative text. The House adopted it May 29 and Senate May 30. Official history; final law.
For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.
Official bill versions
Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.
Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?
Potential gains and public-money risks
The legislature describes cryptocurrency as having strategic potential and as a possible hedge against inflation and economic volatility. Those are legislative findings, not a promised return or proof that losses cannot occur. Texas could gain if reserve investments perform well; losses and management costs could instead reduce public assets. Qualified custody and trading providers may receive contracts, while the state takes on investment, custody and oversight responsibilities. The law supplies safeguards and reporting but does not guarantee a profitable outcome. final law, Sections 403.702–.708.
The May 27 conference/final fiscal note finds the state fiscal effect indeterminate because future appropriations and the amount and value of cryptocurrency purchases are unknown. It assumes administrative costs can be paid from reserve proceeds and anticipates no local-government fiscal effect. SB21 itself makes no appropriation; that does not establish whether a separate budget law later supplied money or whether purchases subsequently occurred.
The fiscal note also warns that an outside-the-treasury fund may limit future legislative appropriation control and flags funds-consolidation review. Spending authority is not an audited account balance. This briefing reviews SB21’s enacted design, not actual subsequent holdings, returns, contracts or transactions. All seven fiscal postings were read; earlier House notes discussing donations or staking describe versions that changed before enactment.
Review scope: entire final act and matching conference text, official history, five posted versions, the one indexed amendment and its disposition, seven fiscal postings, and the prior cash-management and investment-exception statutes.
Recorded House vote
05/29/2025 · Record 4050
House adoption of the conference committee report on SB 21. This is the stated House motion, not necessarily a separate vote on an amendment.
110 yea · 25 nay · 2 present, not voting
Individual recorded positions and absences
Yea (110)
Ashby, Bell, C., Bell, K., Bernal, Bhojani, Bowers, Buckley, Bucy, Bumgarner, Button, Cain, Campos, Canales, Capriglione, Cole, Collier, Cook, Cortez, Craddick, Cunningham, Curry, Darby, Davis, A., Davis, Y., Dean, DeAyala, Dorazio, Dyson, Fairly, Frank, Garcia, J., Garcia, L., Gates, Gerdes, Geren, Gervin-Hawkins, Guerra, Guillen, Harless, Harris Davila, Hefner, Hickland, Holt, Hopper, Howard, Hull, Hunter, Isaac, King, Kitzman, LaHood, Lalani, Landgraf, Leach, Leo Wilson, Little, Lopez, J., Lopez, R., Louderback, Lowe, Lozano, Lujan, Luther, Martinez, Martinez Fischer, McLaughlin, McQueeney, Metcalf, Meyer, Moody, Morales, E., Morgan, Muñoz, Noble, Olcott, Oliverson, Ordaz, Orr, Patterson, Paul, Perez, M., Perez, V., Phelan, Raymond, Reynolds, Romero, Rose, Schofield, Shaheen, Shofner, Simmons, Slawson, Smithee, Swanson, Talarico, Tepper, Thompson, Tinderholt, Toth, Troxclair, Turner, VanDeaver, Vasut, Villalobos, Vo, Ward Johnson, Wharton, Wilson, Wu, Zwiener
Nay (25)
Anchía, Bryant, Flores, Gámez, Garcia Hernandez, González, J., González, M., Goodwin, Harrison, Hernandez, Hinojosa, Johnson, Jones, J., Lambert, Money, Morales, C., Pierson, Plesa, Richardson, Rodríguez Ramos, Rosenthal, Schatzline, Schoolcraft, Spiller, Walle
Present, not voting (2)
Mr. Speaker(C), Bonnen
Absent, excused (6)
Allen, Dutton, Harris, Kerwin, Meza, Virdell
Absent (7)
Alders, Barry, Hayes, Jones, V., Longoria, Manuel, Morales Shaw
Names and categories appear as printed in the official journal. Read the exact House record ↗
Official sources
- Bill history and latest recorded action
- Bill versions, analyses and fiscal notes
- Action history and votes
- Amendment index
Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.