2025 · Regular session · Senate bill
SB2145
SB2145 gives two types of local bodies a specific way to meet with most members participating remotely, while requiring someone to be physically present.
Official caption: Relating to the authority of the advisory body of a public improvement district and the board of directors of a reinvestment zone to hold a meeting by a telecommunication device.
Official report lists Senate author(s): Perry. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.
Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.
Bill highlights
Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.
Read the full explanation ↓What does it do?
SB2145 gives two types of local bodies a specific way to meet with most members participating remotely, while requiring someone to be physically present. It covers public-improvement-district advisory bodies and Chapter 311 reinvestment-zone boards—not every public board. Signed May 30, 2025; effective September 1, 2025. Final law; Official history.
What changed along the way?
For a public-improvement-district advisory body appointed under Local Government Code 372.008, at least one member must be physically present. Any number of other members may join by telephone, video or a similar device and count toward a quorum, votes and other participation, regardless of the meeting’s topic. These advisory bodies develop and recommend improvement plans. Final law, section 1; Advisory body’s existing role.
For a reinvestment-zone board under Tax Code Chapter 311, the person physically present must be the chair or vice chair. Other members may participate remotely with the same quorum and voting recognition, regardless of topic. The meeting remains subject to ordinary notice requirements; the notice must identify where the chair or vice chair will be, and the meeting must be open and audible to the public at that location. Final law, section 2.
Both bodies must provide two-way audio between participating members and must stop the meeting if a member’s audio connection fails, until it is restored. Continuing merely because enough other members remain connected is not the rule in these new sections. Final law, sections 1–2.
The two provisions are not word-for-word identical: the new advisory-body section does not repeat the reinvestment-board section’s express notice and public-location clauses. That difference should not be read as a general declaration that advisory meetings are exempt from every other applicable requirement. The act creates a specific remote-participation route; it does not authorize wholly online meetings with nobody physically present or require a public internet livestream. Final law; Open Meetings Act definitions; General open-meeting rule.
Prior framework and passage: General telephone and video meeting laws already allowed remote meetings under conditions and exceptions; SB2145 is not the first Texas law allowing remote participation. Its five operative versions match, both committees reported without amendments, and the amendment index lists none. Prior telephone-meeting framework; Prior video-meeting framework; Introduced; Senate committee; Senate-passed; House committee; Final law; Version index; Amendment index.
For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.
Official bill versions
Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.
Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?
Members may have less need to travel, and the bodies may find it easier to assemble a quorum. The tradeoff is dependence on working audio connections, with mandatory pauses when a member’s link fails. Reinvestment-zone boards must still provide the specified physical public listening location. The act does not quantify travel savings or guarantee easier public participation. Final law.
The April 9 fiscal note anticipates no state fiscal impact and no significant local-government fiscal impact. It does not say every local body will have zero technology costs, and the act makes no appropriation. Official fiscal note; Final law.
Official sources
- Bill history and latest recorded action
- Bill versions, analyses and fiscal notes
- Action history and votes
- Amendment index
Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.