2025 · Regular session · Senate bill
SB2196
SB2196 extends the permitted duration of a magistrate’s emergency protection order by 30 days at both ends of each applicable range.
Official caption: Relating to the period during which an order for emergency protection remains in effect.
Official report lists Senate author(s): Johnson. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.
Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.
Bill highlights
Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.
Read the full explanation ↓What does it do?
SB2196 extends the permitted duration of a magistrate’s emergency protection order by 30 days at both ends of each applicable range. The ordinary range becomes 61–91 days; the specified deadly-weapon family-violence category becomes 91–121 days. It applies only to orders issued on or after September 1, 2025. Signed May 20, 2025. Final law; Official history.
What changed along the way?
Orders under Code of Criminal Procedure 17.292(a) or (b)(1) previously lasted 31–61 days after issuance; they now last 61–91 days. Subsection (a) allows emergency orders at the magistrate appearance after arrest for family violence or the other listed offenses, and (b)(1) requires an order for a family-violence arrest involving serious bodily injury. The bill changes these orders’ duration, not the underlying grounds for issuing them. Final law, section 1; Existing categories and prior duration.
For orders required by subsection (b)(2)—a family-violence arrest involving the use or exhibition of a deadly weapon during an assault—the former 61–91-day range becomes 91–121 days after issuance. This is not a rule making every protective order last 121 days. Orders issued before September 1, 2025 remain under the law in force when issued; the bill does not automatically add time to those earlier orders. Final law, sections 1–3; Deadly-weapon category.
The order still takes effect on issuance, with a copy served on the defendant in person or electronically and a separate service record. The retained modification rule requires notice to every affected party, a hearing, and findings that the original order is unworkable, the change will not increase the victim’s risk, and it will not endanger a protected person. SB2196 does not create unrestricted power to alter an order. Final law, retained language in 17.292(j).
Changes during passage: The introduced, Senate committee, Senate-passed, House committee and final versions contain the same operative provisions. Both committees reported without amendments, and the official amendment index lists none. Introduced; Senate committee; Senate-passed; House committee; Final law; Amendment index; Version index.
For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.
Official bill versions
Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.
Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?
People protected by newly issued orders can have restrictions remain in place longer, and defendants must comply for the longer applicable period. Courts and law enforcement must use the new ranges. The act does not measure violence prevented or guarantee a person’s safety, and it does not change the duration of every other kind of protective order. Final law.
The April 14 fiscal note anticipates no significant state or local fiscal implication and assumes costs can be absorbed within existing resources. That budget estimate does not erase the practical consequences of longer restrictions for the people involved. The act makes no appropriation. Fiscal note.
Official sources
- Bill history and latest recorded action
- Bill versions, analyses and fiscal notes
- Action history and votes
- Amendment index
Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.