2025 · Regular session · Senate bill
SB2419
SB2419 allows a qualifying limited district to exercise the former special district’s legal powers and duties after a specified kind of municipal disannexation, despite restrictions in its earlier agreements with the city.
Official caption: Relating to the authority of a special district to exercise certain powers and duties following municipal disannexation of certain areas.
Official report lists Senate author(s): Paxton. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.
Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.
Bill highlights
Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.
Read the full explanation ↓What does it do?
SB2419 allows a qualifying limited district to exercise the former special district’s legal powers and duties after a specified kind of municipal disannexation, despite restrictions in its earlier agreements with the city. The authority applies only within the part of the disannexed area inside that district. It does not itself remove land from a city. The bill became law without the governor’s signature and took effect May 24, 2025. Final law; Official history.
What changed along the way?
What changes: A limited district created by converting a special district under a strategic partnership agreement may exercise all powers and duties granted by law to its predecessor in the qualifying area, notwithstanding that partnership agreement or another agreement the district and disannexing city executed before disannexation. Under the existing partnership framework, a limited district continues after full-purpose annexation, with functions and other terms set by agreement; its powers otherwise remain subject to statutory and agreement limits. The new provision overrides the specified prior agreements for this purpose, not every law or every contract with anyone. Final law, new Local Government Code 43.1463(f-1); Strategic-partnership framework, particularly subsections (a), (g), (i) and (j).
Which areas qualify: The change is tied to disannexation under section 43.1463, not all land leaving any city. That existing section covers areas with residents when annexed, whose annexation was initiated by a municipality of at least 500,000 people and finalized for full purposes between March 3, 2015, and December 1, 2017. It excludes a municipality containing all or part of a federal military installation active on May 1, 2023, or whose extraterritorial jurisdiction contains or adjoins such an installation. The district must be located in and serving an area disannexed under that section. Final law; Existing disannexation law, subsections (a)–(d).
What does not change: The existing section still governs the disannexation election, city retention of infrastructure previously transferred from a special district, district-dissolution protection, emergency-services-district service and the area’s applicable share of municipal debt. SB2419 does not return all former district property, cancel that debt or promise lower taxes. Whether a particular district has a specific power depends on the law governing its predecessor; this briefing does not determine eligibility or powers for an individual district. Final law; Existing disannexation law, subsections (c)–(h).
Passage: The introduced, Senate committee, Senate-passed, House committee and final operative texts matched. The official amendment index lists no amendments. Introduced; Senate committee; Senate-passed; House committee; Amendment index; Final law.
For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.
Official bill versions
Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.
Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?
Qualifying districts gain room to resume their former legal functions without being confined by the specified pre-disannexation agreements; cities and residents may see a different allocation of local responsibilities. The fiscal note anticipates no state fiscal implication and no significant local fiscal implication. It does not quantify a particular district’s service costs, rates, tax effects or implementation choices. No actual district action or service improvement is verified here. Only posted fiscal note; Final law.
Official sources
- Bill history and latest recorded action
- Bill versions, analyses and fiscal notes
- Action history and votes
- Amendment index
Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.