2025 · Regular session · Senate bill
SB2929
SB2929 removes the statutory warning-and-repeat-behavior requirement when a referee, judge or other official ejects a spectator from a covered school athletic event.
Official caption: Relating to the removal of a spectator of certain school extracurricular athletic activities or competitions.
Official report lists Senate author(s): Creighton. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.
Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.
Bill highlights
Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.
Read the full explanation ↓What does it do?
SB2929 removes the statutory warning-and-repeat-behavior requirement when a referee, judge or other official ejects a spectator from a covered school athletic event. It applies to extracurricular athletic activities or competitions sponsored or sanctioned by a school district or the University Interscholastic League. Signed May 27, 2025, the act took effect that day and applies beginning with the 2025–2026 school year. Final law; Official history.
What changed along the way?
The existing school-property statute describes removal by school administrators and specified officers when a person refuses to leave peaceably and either poses a substantial risk of harm or behaves inappropriately after a verbal warning and persists. The new subsection says that verbal warning and persistence are not required for a covered athletic official to eject a spectator from the event. It removes those two procedural steps; it does not say all school visitors everywhere may be removed for any reason. 2017 law, section 5; Final law, new section 37.105(a-1).
The change concerns ejection from the athletic activity or competition. It does not itself impose a future attendance ban, create a criminal offense or repeal the rest of the school-property statute. A separate district-property exclusion should not be confused with an official’s immediate event ejection. This briefing does not determine the appeal procedure or other legal limits for an individual incident. Final law; Surrounding property-exclusion provisions.
The introduced bill, Senate report, engrossed bill, House report and enrolled law have the same operative text. The official amendment index lists no amendments, so there is no adopted floor change to distinguish from the final wording. Introduced bill; All versions; Amendment index.
For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.
Official bill versions
Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.
Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?
Officials can act without first giving the statutory verbal warning and waiting for the spectator to repeat the inappropriate behavior. Spectators lose that particular warning opportunity at covered events. This may allow faster responses to disruption, but the act does not establish how often officials will use the authority or prove a reduction in abuse or injuries. Final law.
The introduced and engrossed fiscal notes anticipate no significant fiscal implication for the state or local governments. They provide no quantified savings or separate estimate of effects on individual spectators. Introduced fiscal note; Engrossed fiscal note.
Official sources
- Bill history and latest recorded action
- Bill versions, analyses and fiscal notes
- Action history and votes
- Amendment index
Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.