2025 · Regular session · Senate bill
SB36
SB36 establishes a Homeland Security Division in the Texas Department of Public Safety to coordinate law-enforcement work supporting homeland security, border security and protection of critical infrastructure.
Official caption: Relating to the homeland security activities of certain entities, including the establishment and operations of the Homeland Security Division in the Department of Public Safety.
Official report lists Senate author(s): Parker. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.
Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.
Bill highlights
Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.
- SB36 establishes a Homeland Security Division in the Texas Department of Public Safety to coordinate law-enforcement work supporting homeland security, border security and protection of critical infrastructure.
- The DPS director appoints the chief with the Public Safety Commission's consent.
- The division must lead strategic and operational border-security planning, coordinate participating federal/state agencies, local governments and private organizations, help DPS regions with tactical planning, and operate border-intelligence centers.
- Other duties include regularly developing a statewide homeland-security plan; coordinating exercises with emergency-management and other partners; planning for major law-enforcement emergencies; assessing criminal threats and response capabilities; coordinating the named annual federal preparedness assessments; and sharing threat information with public and private organizations.
- For physical protection of critical infrastructure against criminal actors and organizations, the law prioritizes energy, communications, transportation, and water/wastewater systems within the federally identified infrastructure sectors.
- On request, the division supplies subject-matter advice to state agencies and local governments.
What does it do?
A dedicated homeland-security division within DPS
SB36 establishes a Homeland Security Division in the Texas Department of Public Safety to coordinate law-enforcement work supporting homeland security, border security and protection of critical infrastructure. Signed June 20, 2025, it took effect September 1, 2025. It is a division within DPS, not a separate federal immigration agency or a replacement for the Texas Division of Emergency Management. official history; final law.
The DPS director appoints the chief with the Public Safety Commission’s consent. The chief reports to the director and, as the director determines, a deputy director. The chief may hire deputy chiefs and other staff and delegate duties unless law or rule forbids it. Existing law already allowed DPS to create other necessary divisions; SB36 expressly adds this division to the statutory structure and assigns its duties. final law, Sections 411.552–411.553; prior Section 411.002.
Border intelligence, planning and infrastructure protection
The division must lead strategic and operational border-security planning, coordinate participating federal/state agencies, local governments and private organizations, help DPS regions with tactical planning, and operate border-intelligence centers. It sets intelligence collection and management policies and manages Operation Drawbridge, the border camera and surveillance-equipment program. These provisions assign coordination and intelligence duties; they do not themselves establish a new criminal offense or a general exemption from other legal limits on surveillance. final law, Sections 411.554–411.555.
Other duties include regularly developing a statewide homeland-security plan; coordinating exercises with emergency-management and other partners; planning for major law-enforcement emergencies; assessing criminal threats and response capabilities; coordinating the named annual federal preparedness assessments; and sharing threat information with public and private organizations. The division must help agencies and local governments comply with the specified federal restrictions on commerce with certain entities, including listed Chinese military companies and other sanctioned entities. This is an assistance duty tied to federal restrictions, not a declaration that all commerce with every Chinese business is prohibited. final law, Section 411.556.
For physical protection of critical infrastructure against criminal actors and organizations, the law prioritizes energy, communications, transportation, and water/wastewater systems within the federally identified infrastructure sectors. The division must categorize infrastructure and its dependencies, conduct coordination exercises and support the state operations center during disasters. It must operate a program training public/private volunteers to recognize and report infrastructure threats, with reasonable eligibility requirements allowed. It may establish work groups and must operate or establish the specified technology-study groups, propose annual DPS research priorities, coordinate with higher education and research law-enforcement technologies. final law, Sections 411.557–411.560.
On request, the division supplies subject-matter advice to state agencies and local governments. Before each legislative session it must confer with state agencies about their homeland-security budget requests and coordinate to reduce unnecessary duplication. For this budget provision, homeland-security activity covers prevention, discovery, response or recovery involving terrorist attacks, hostile military/paramilitary action or extraordinary law-enforcement emergencies. The Homeland Security Council and permanent advisory committees must collaborate with the new division when advising the governor; they are not abolished. final law, Sections 411.561, 421.024 and 421.045; prior Section 421.024; prior Section 421.045.
Public reports and private information
The division must maintain a public website and publish its assessments and reports when they are neither confidential nor excepted from disclosure. But information supplied by a private organization receives a specific protection if the organization considers it highly sensitive, proprietary or otherwise confidential and gives written notice. The division, work group or task force must secure it in the same manner as the provider, and ordinarily cannot disclose it further without consent. final law, Sections 411.562–411.563.
The protection is not an absolute veto over a legal disclosure requirement. If state/federal law or a court order requires disclosure, the recipient must, to the extent practicable, notify the provider no later than the fifth business day before disclosure and preserve the information’s original condition, including labels or markings. The act thus combines a public-reporting duty with a broad written-notice protection for private submissions; it does not make all division records public or all records secret. final law, Section 411.563.
Moving existing centers and positions
As soon as practicable after the effective date, DPS must move management and operations of the Border Security Operations Center and Joint Operations and Intelligence Centers to the division. Where another state agency is involved, a written transfer agreement must set an effective date. Related money, contracts, leases, property, software/documentation, records, obligations and unspent/unobligated appropriations transfer; existing rules and procedures continue until DPS changes them, and agencies must provide necessary access. final law, Section 5.
Related full-time-equivalent positions also transfer to DPS, but the people holding those jobs are not automatically guaranteed employment there. DPS must post the positions and consider—but need not hire—applicants who worked at the transferring agency immediately before transfer. This briefing explains those statutory transition duties, not a finding that each transfer or hiring action has occurred. final law, Section 5(h).
What changed along the way?
Committee changes focused the mission and protected private submissions
The Senate substitute shifted broad security/resilience wording toward law-enforcement initiatives and threats from criminal actors and organizations. It expressly coordinated exercises with the Texas Division of Emergency Management, removed examples concerning mass migration and acute infrastructure demand, removed a proposed budget-information rulemaking provision, and dropped a proposed rewrite of the governor’s homeland-security duties. The engrossed bill retained that substantive substitute. five posted versions; final law.
The House substitute added the private-organization sensitive-information provision, including written notice, protection and mandatory-disclosure safeguards. That addition survived into the final act. five posted versions; final law, Section 411.563.
A proposed power over grant priorities was deleted
The sole listed floor amendment, Representative Hefner’s House amendment, struck the proposed grant-and-reimbursement section and renumbered the following sections. The deleted proposal would have required the division, with the governor, to set priorities and guidelines for certain state/local grant or reimbursement programs notwithstanding other program law. The final act does not grant that proposed override, although its advisory and budget-coordination duties remain. amendment index; five posted versions; final law.
The House adopted the amendment May 23, 2025, and the Senate concurred in House amendments May 28. The final law reflects the committee additions and floor deletion; there was no conference rewrite. official history.
For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.
Official bill versions
Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.
Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?
Coordination benefits come with staffing costs and disclosure tradeoffs
A dedicated division could clarify responsibility for intelligence, exercises and infrastructure protection, and reduce overlapping agency work. Benefits depend on effective coordination, usable intelligence and implementation; the act does not establish a measured reduction in crime, border crossings or infrastructure incidents. The private-information protection may encourage organizations to share sensitive details, while limiting what the public can inspect; written notice and legally compelled disclosure conditions matter. final law.
The May 25 final-stage fiscal note estimates $7,150,649 in general-revenue costs for fiscal years 2026–2027: $3,739,903 in 2026 and $3,410,746 in 2027, with 23 additional full-time-equivalent positions. It assumes four positions for administration, ten for critical-infrastructure protection and nine for preparedness. Salary and benefits total $3,022,564 each year; other costs are $717,339 in 2026 and $388,182 in 2027. Those figures are estimates, not proof of actual hiring or spending.
DPS said the duties could not be absorbed within existing resources. The fiscal note anticipates no significant local-government cost and projects the $3,410,746 annual state cost continuing through 2030. All five posted fiscal-note entries retain the same two-year estimate, despite the policy changes. The act itself makes no appropriation, although it provides a legal basis for funding and transfers existing center-related funds as specified. No quantified savings from eliminating duplication are established by these records. five posted versions; final law.
Review scope: all six sections of the final act, official history, all five versions, the sole floor amendment and its adoption, all five fiscal-note entries, and the prior DPS/council/advisory-committee provisions. The briefing does not treat proposed grant-control authority as enacted law.
Official sources
- Bill history and latest recorded action
- Bill versions, analyses and fiscal notes
- Action history and votes
- Amendment index
Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.